Of course it would and then some. The implication being that Melton has CCTV footage of Aaron guzzling Nick's goo out of April's snatch.
Not only have you then distributed something without consent, which is a sexual act, you have also then illicitly recorded it in the first place.
It is still retarded, as the chances of Nick having the right angle and the definition to capture clear goo eating is near non existent.
So, hypothetically, let's say Nick has footage, the best case would be it shows snatch licking and then later April said Nick's goo was inside and Aaron enjoyed it.
Nick is sick in the head. Firstly, they were fucking each others wives and sleeping 4 to a bed. Some bodily fluids got swapped somewhere. We all get it.
Secondly, so fucking what? How does Nick proving it help him in any way? Probation shorter? Viewers come back? The Judge announced the test result on his kid is totally doesn't count? His wife isn't a whore? He totally didn't do that coke stream? Wtf...
It’s the kind of logic normal people won’t understand. Nick is so brain buck broken that he creates these retarded scenarios that only he thinks is a win condition.
Also a symptom of how degenerate he is, the man talks about eating semen like normal people talk about brunch.
It's two fold. The probation officer might start to brush all snitching off as gay Internet drama where legitimate concerns could have been missed, or they might get extra pissy and look at Skelly with a magnifying glass. A probation officer in Spicer of all places (or the country) can't have that much work to do right?
Either way this targeted harassment angle of probation revocation is kind of fucking retarded. It's funny to watch him squirm but he's not going anywhere with this gay shit.
I mean… You wouldn’t say: “Mr Probation officer, Rekieta is making shit jokes online and saying mean things about Kurt!”
You’d say: “Mr. Probation officer, I’m calling because I’m concerned about your client! He’s bragging about taking amphetamines, seems high in his streams while appearing to harass people. He’s also up at all nights tweeting and engaging in antisocial behavior.”
And once he fires up the stream to see what this is all about, he’ll see a man who’s clearly unhinged taking pharmaceutical amphetamine.
No, he’s not robbing a bank, but Nick has been made the governments bitch for the next five years. He’s supposed to be on his best behavior and be a functioning citizen.
Once the PO has Nick in his sight and can see what anyone can see: That this isn’t the behavior of a normal, sober man, he can start testing him more, demand that Nick gets an actual job, and of course send him to jail for 27 days. The sentence doesn’t say: “If Nick doesn’t snort coke for a month he won’t go to the big house”, it merely says that they MAY stay the jail stay.
It’s not something they have to do, and if they get the feeling that Nick is obeying the letter but not the spirit of the law, it’s def in the cards.