Was it this one or something similar?
Wasn't that book, but it looked like it's some sort of "woke" crap. Book has a mostly red cover, and part of the cover illustration was a guy wearing a MAGA cap (of course).
Sounds an awful lot like what SJWs are trying to do, especially with LGBTQ. And they have succeeded at infiltrating education and academia with that "ideology" of "woke" BS.
"Son, let me tell you about an artist who had a dream for a better world."
I saw that interview clip. What the journo was doing seemed to be trying to get in the last word real quick and move on so the headline would be "Trump thinks the letters in the picture were a real tattoo lol." From the exchange, I wasn't 100% certain whether Trump was saying that, or just the interpretation of the tattoos was clear, because he doesn't acknowledge the point about the photo; but he might not even have been thinking of that particular picture. In either case, the other guy was entirely uninterested in clarifying the point.
He was desperate to take control of that conversation. Too bad he's utterly shit at it (I think even Biden could have talked circles around this idiot) and Trump is a master of dominating conversations.
Exactly, turning the other cheek really means be the bigger man when someone insults you, especially for your religion, which was vital at the time when Christianity was heavily mocked and is still widely in practice today. It’s the fundamental difference between Islam and Christianity. Christians are supposed to rise above insults and minor offenses, Muslims will murder you for doodling a face.
Unfortunately, Take It Down passed Congress and will likely be signed into law. Only exemptions I can see are commercial work involving nudity as that implies consent.
Do you remember last time around when Trump brought up coyotes and the press all acted like he was talking about the animals not the term for people smugglers? I'm sure it's actually physically, mentally, or spiritually possible to hate journalists as much as they deserve.
They had to switch it to climate change because of the fuckups of the 70s to 90s. Can't have people questioning the narrative.
I see their priorities are in order.
The talking point used to be that he walked into a seedy tattoo parlor and just managed to pick the one combination of tattoos that an infamous Latin American gang use to identify themselves.
Trump was meeting obtuseness with obtuseness. What’s the likelihood that Kilmar Garcia:
I will remind you that in that world, if you get gang tattoos and aren't part of the gang, and the gangsters see it, they just kill you.
uh, who do they think was living in those small towns to begin with?
There is a loophole where they can do anything and never be held accountable. It was never going to stop at gamergate. Outsourcing all blame and risk was the logical conclusion.
Yes indeed, not the kind of attention a Maryland dad would want.