Debate @Thé au lait on the possibility of Gorl Tawk posters ever achieving self-awareness

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Your hiring policy is shit and these women aren't going to decide they want to fuck you. I'm also not a lolicon. I don't know how the website dedicated to digging up dirt on people can obsess this hard over a topic, apply it to a user and then come up with a wrong diagnosis. Also there's more evidence you like that shit than I do, every second user who has a problem with you is like "Did you know ED said Null likes shota?" You should know better than anyone throwing those accusations around is idiotic.
ALL THESE WORLDS BOARDS ARE YOURS – EXCEPT EUROPA BP.
ATTEMPT NO LANDING POSTING THERE.
 
You literally have your title set by the mods to "'It's just a drawing' award" for screaming about how anime porn of little girls is "just a drawing, guise!"
It's even worse, he has a 40 pages Mass Debates thread about it named after him:
 
I'd take a walk and let the issue drop none of this is worthwhile to get MATI about.
 
It's even worse, he has a 40 pages Mass Debates thread about it named after him:
I still remember this thread happening, I have no idea how the fuck someone pulls this and then acts offended when someone says what they are
Yeah, you're probably right. I still don't like @Thé au lait for regurgitating stupid accusations displaced Sharty posters made. If some random poster does it, it's one thing. If a mod is doing it then they are a moron.
Only pedophiles defend pedophiles, I am not regurgitating jack shit. I am taking a look at the shit you say and putting two and two together from that.
 
Yeah, you're probably right. I still don't like @Thé au lait for regurgitating stupid accusations displaced Sharty posters made. If some random poster does it, it's one thing. If a mod is doing it then they are a moron.
You're a blithering ass and your stupidity has no bounds.
I still remember this thread happening, I have no idea how the fuck someone pulls this and then acts offended when someone says what they are
Pedophiles are known to be retarded, especially the "it's just a drawing" types.
 
Yeah, you're probably right. I still don't like @Thé au lait for regurgitating stupid accusations displaced Sharty posters made. If some random poster does it, it's one thing. If a mod is doing it then they are a moron.
Tamers bigger defender btw.webp
Kill yourself, pedo nigger.
 
>Be based BP janny @Thé au lait
>remove pedophile brony from board for being self
>Somehow pedo thinks this not acceptable

Am I missing something?
 
Only pedophiles defend pedophiles, I am not regurgitating jack shit. I am taking a look at the shit you say and putting two and two together from that.
Moron, if dumb baseless accusations of pedophilia were taken at face level every single time then this website would not exist. Null has been hit with those regularly. You having any control over what people can post on this site is a greater "danger" to anyone or anything than lines drawn onto a page.
 
Imagine posting in a board that specifically says you will be banned if you shit it up then publicly crying like a baby for getting banned after you shit up the board.
 
Imagine posting in a board that specifically says you will be banned if you shit it up then publicly crying like a baby for getting banned after you shit up the board.
I wasn't banned (yet.) I made this thread because the retardation of the newest mod should be put on display. The retardation of random posters calling me a lolicon is a bonus.
 
Moron, if dumb baseless accusations of pedophilia were taken at face level every single time then this website would not exist. Null has been hit with those regularly. You having any control over what people can post on this site is a greater "danger" to anyone or anything than lines drawn onto a page.
Holy shit, your situation is not comparable with Null's at all. I'm saying it genuinely this time: Kill yourself.
 
>debate [user i don’t like] on [issue im infuriated about] thread no 346573
 
Back
Top Bottom