😵‍💫 Skitzocow Chris Gillon / Autphag and Spergchan / Sophie Y’Israeli - Autistic North Koreaboo, Also a Man

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Who passes better as a woman?

  • Autphag:

    Votes: 36 9.9%

  • Robert Wayne Stiles

    Votes: 327 90.1%
  • Total voters
    363
Cuck Norris said:
Again, you could have just said "no u" to get your point across.
Click to expand...
Nah. That was the most succinct way I could summarise your orthodox approach to language. People like you are idiots for constraining your diction and grammatical syntax in this pseudointelligent way, while pseudotranny bastards like Cuntster/Amber get away with running circles around you using North Korean news agency style word salads. We've figured out the secrets of human semantic manipulation. Ahaaahaaahaaha imbecile.
 
Have you learned how to write in Hangul properly yet?
 
I might add to what Cuck Norris said that "attackative" from a few pages back is a neologism, and a silly one at that. The perfectly good existing word "belligerent" would have done; it has the same number of syllables, so you could have gone on being needlessly polysyllabic without taking the trouble to invent words that sound like an ad agency for an insurance firm tried to be clever. There's nothing wrong with coining terms as long as they fill a need, don't already duplicate the function of an existing word that most reasonably bright people would know, and don't sound childish -- "Mummy, I hate that attackative doggie next door!" You're not inflating anyone's opinion of you but your own.
 
Cuck Norris said:
no u
Click to expand...
You're a failed psychopath of the system-abiding type. I am a failed psychopath of the system-rebelling type. But will either of us ever know what it is like to ve Cunster, a successful psychopath of the system-manipulating type? No. You're wasting your time taking quarrels with me, bud.
 
NobleGreyHorse said:
I might add to what Cuck Norris said that "attackative" from a few pages back is a neologism, and a silly one at that. The perfectly good existing word "belligerent" would have done; it has the same number of syllables, so you could have gone on being needlessly polysyllabic without taking the trouble to invent words that sound like an ad agency for an insurance firm tried to be clever. There's nothing wrong with coining terms as long as they fill a need, don't already duplicate the function of an existing word that most reasonably bright people would know, and don't sound childish -- "Mummy, I hate that attackative doggie next door!" You're not inflating anyone's opinion of you but your own.
Click to expand...
Moar prescriptivist gibberish!
 
Autphag said:
You're a failed psychopath of the system-abiding type. I am a failed psychopath of the system-rebelling type. But will either of us ever know what it is like to ve Cunster, a successful psychopath of the system-manipulating type? No. You're wasting your time taking quarrels with me, bud.
Click to expand...
So when confronted with truth you regress to spouting more gibberish. Good to know. Also, no one cares about Cuntster but you. You can keep trollshielding but it's not going to take the focus off you.
 
Cuck Norris said:
So when confronted with truth you regress to spouting more gibberish. Good to know. Also, no one cares about Cuntster but you. You can keep trollshielding but it's not going to take the focus off you.
Click to expand...

They have a boner for Cunster.
 
Autphag said:
Oh I see. You're one of those stupid "prescribed grammar" faggot. We know the reason you can't refute the "brevity is wit" cliché is because you are the moron.
Click to expand...

"The writer either has a meaning and cannot express it, or he inadvertently says something else, or he is almost indifferent as to whether his words mean anything or not. This mixture of vagueness and sheer incompetence is the most marked characteristic of modern English prose, and especially of any kind of political writing. As soon as certain topics are raised, the concrete melts into the abstract and no one seems able to think of turns of speech that are not hackneyed: prose consists less and less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning, and more and more of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated hen-house."

Autphag's Word Salad tendencies in one paragraph.
 
Gook Choy said:
"The writer either has a meaning and cannot express it, or he inadvertently says something else, or he is almost indifferent as to whether his words mean anything or not. This mixture of vagueness and sheer incompetence is the most marked characteristic of modern English prose, and especially of any kind of political writing. As soon as certain topics are raised, the concrete melts into the abstract and no one seems able to think of turns of speech that are not hackneyed: prose consists less and less of words chosen for the sake of their meaning, and more and more of phrases tacked together like the sections of a prefabricated hen-house."

Autphag's Word Salad tendencies in one paragraph.
Click to expand...
In other words, Orwell was so hopeless at interpreting the works of his contemporaries that he had the tenacity to engage in a pseudointellectual tardrage where, disguised under a meaningful dismissal of their meaning, he tacitly admits to having a deficient enough discernment as to be completely bereft of critical literary comprehension.

His proto-postmodernist tard rages are (were?) like Cuntster trying to explain autism through his monoculturally negroid prism of perception; it falls under that same folly alleged in his charges of the pseudopolemic critique of others.

And considering none of you properly interpreted that he was attacking the writing styles more properly characterised by your stilted overscientificness (not that it changes my position -- a hack is still a hack), it's even more hilarious that you would use any quote of Orwell's (hopelessly out of context) to attempt to characterise my writing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom