💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    698
So, if he was an unrepentant prick, yup.
1744879139591.webp
Not just unrepentant but pissed that he got caught.
 
As noted by others, the pre-sentencing investigators may have received reports from Nick's mandated "drug outpatient" sessions (rehab), where the program leaders may have noted that Nick was being a smarmy "I'm too good for this" faggot and proceeded to relay that to the PSI.

As always, Nick is his own worst enemy. A pathological need to box his way out of a corner, even when it's not in his own interest.

I suspect Nick always believed he was going to win his case dismissal and had no intention of pleading guilt until forced to do so by no other option. The man sees nothing wrong in his actions and is dismissive of efforts to rehabilitate or humble him.

I hope we'll see the judge call him the fuck out while he has to sit in his defendant cuck chair and take it. He'll seethe hard in his return stream after his 30 days in the shower block with Big Bubba.
 
When your CHILD is expected to monitor you for drug or alcohol abuse in addition to his own struggles, you’ve lost the game of life.
There have been certain details emerge in this case that just blew me away. One was the transcript where either the guardian ad litem or social worker (I can’t recall which) testified that the oldest child was prepared to monitor his parents’ behavior and help them through challenging times while also liaising between them and the authorities as needed. I am still floored that nobody in that courtroom pointed out how grossly inappropriate and inherently abusive such a dynamic is.

If the Rekeita kids ever do find this thread, I hope they can understand that none of this was their responsibility to manage. That they should have been allowed to remain children. That they should never have been confronted with information about their parents’ sexual activity. That their parents should never have tried to insert April into their family sanctuary. That their father never should have described his children being made wards of the state as “a rough summer.”

But mostly I hope they know it’s not their fault their parents are unrepentant fuckups, and that they are not required to maintain contact with either of them when they come of age. Nobody has carte blanche to hinder your safety and well-being, even if they’re your parents.

The first memoirs from the children of mommy bloggers are already being published. I hope the Rekieta kids never have to sell their stories to finance their lifelong therapy. But if they do, they’ll find a very sympathetic global audience ready to hear what they have to say.
 
I’m not saying they should sit their asses at home. But for each of these small children to have multiple music, dance, etc. lessons is fucked up. Especially because they never hear the end of what a hassle the driving is. Kids will feel guilty and simultaneously resent being made to feel that way.
Especially when the never-ending activities are paired with at-home neglect. Even the most dimwitted child will eventually put two-and-two together and realise they're unwanted, and that the activities are a means to get them away from the house and occupy them - essentially daycare. Although with all this said, I'm glad Nick has done the bare minimum here and exposed them to some of the outside world. The worst possible situation would be total at-home neglect where they don't get a feel for the world beyond their retarded parents. That's cult territory.
 
Last edited:
is it possible weens have bugged the prosecution with Nick’s antics and that’s why they’ve recommended a harsher sentence than we expected?
The Presentence Investigation looks into Nick's life, how he behaves, for aggravating or mitigating factors.
His kids and their reliance on him is a massive mitigating factor, which is why all three letters to the court are playing it up.
It will very likely keep Nick out of prison, because judges want to avoid punishing children for their parent's mistakes if anyway possible.

The aggravating factors would be Nick entire social media activity, which a good investigator will have found easily. Which includes harassment towards a witness in the case, possible admission of further crimes committed, plans to visit Las Vegas to consume drugs, attempts to lay the positive drug tests of his daughter on someone else, attempts to downplay his guilty plea and insinuating that he is only doing it for the family, but that there is a "real story". (If the investigator found this thread and used its archived contents it would be all the more hilarious)

And then we have his comments about "Judge Pussy Liquor", who has since recused herself from the Montagraph case, because those were likely seen by the Judge Wentzel in the process of this lawsuit when he had to review the coke stream to evaluate if the police had lied.

The evaluation is likely very negative and paints a very bad outlook on the chance of Nick remaining clean without the state putting an incentive in place via probation.

And the judge has an interest in slapping Nick around a little bit because he disrespected his colleague and the court system in general.


I fully believe that he will not see prison, as funny as it would be, instead sticking with a high probation duration and extra community service.
Since Nick likes to drive around kids so much, they could use him as a free taxi service to drive senior citizens to doctor's appointments.
 
If my 17 year old son asked me to make him food at 11pm, I'd probably tell him that dinner was about 4 hours ago and that he needs to either eat with us at the table at that time, or sort himself out.

How often could this possibly be happening to merit a mention in the letter anyway??
 
The aggravating factors would be Nick entire social media activity, which a good investigator will have found easily. Which includes harassment towards a witness in the case, possible admission of further crimes committed,
I’m sure the prosecution would be well aware that Ethan Ralph was given a nationwide warrant and charged for intimidating a witness.

Even a cursory glance at his nonsense over the last 12 months tells you how smug he has been. There’s been no remorse. He thought the rehab, that wasn’t rehab, was beneath him. He also thought the statement by the police or social worker (I forget which) that people of his socioeconomic class don’t find themselves in this situation funny, rather than maybe reflecting that it not a good thing.

In hindsight I guess this all makes sense.
 
Comparing nick's dad's letter and kayla's letter...it feels like it goes against each other. The dad's letter implies that nick has enough money to throw around but kayla's letter states that nick has to do all these trivial jobs. Jobs that can be delegated to other hired persons that nick can afford to pay. If the judge has rehabilitation in mind, he/she would probably weight kayla's letter negatively and tell nick to focus on rehab and give the reccommended sentencing. Which would be great tbh.
 
If my 17 year old son asked me to make him food at 11pm, I'd probably tell him that dinner was about 4 hours ago and that he needs to either eat with us at the table at that time, or sort himself out.

How often could this possibly be happening to merit a mention in the letter anyway??
How do you think Nick got the black eye? Why do you think he's constantly late to streams? If he doesn't cook the 11pm tendies he cops a beating from the eldest. Truly he's a saint for putting up with this constant injustice.
 
Even a cursory glance at his nonsense over the last 12 months tells you how smug he has been.
Remember when @Potentially Criminal advised Nick to take a quick plea and STFU about the case entirely?
Nick was always better than anyone else, only he knew the real story, that the warrant would be easily crushed and that Aaron was the actual perpetrator all along.

Worked out great for him to ignore the good advice her received from an actual lawyer.
 
One was the transcript where either the guardian ad litem or social worker (I can’t recall which) testified that the oldest child was prepared to monitor his parents’ behavior and help them through challenging times while also liaising between them and the authorities as needed.

Is this the same oldest child that supposedly needed Nick to cook him dinner at 11PM?

It is interesting to note that Nick and Kayla are so low functioning as parents (even when trying to look good in an appeal to a judge) that they are just about able to be replaced by AI. Teslas can drive you around. There are plenty of AI assistants that can “schedule” and “plan” your week. A subscription to blue apron can make food appear at your door. Heck, even Nick’s ongoing crusade against government oppression can be handled by spambots on most Internet forums. (See 4chan hack)
 
First, I don’t know why everyone is taking Kayla’s letter at face value. Think about it — but don’t overthink it.

A lot of kids don’t even have bedtimes anymore because they have practice or games right after school (and a lot of road time if it’s an away game), only to have to come home and jam on homework until they fall asleep. The booster club used to give us bagged sandwiches and chips for those away game nights, but yeah by 11PM you’d be hungry again.

What Kayla failed to mention in her letter is that by 11PM, Nick has only been awake for a few hours and is still in the middle of his Melton MAP chat shift. He’s probably eating his “breakfast” around 11PM and may as well make enough for him and the oldest.

Most kids can rustle up their own meal unaided and I think we have to give the kid the benefit of the doubt. Remember how we (I) found those old FB comments where Kayla and Bob discussed how they’d left this child, then younger than 10, in charge of his three younger siblings for several hours while Kayla and Nick went hiking? The boy can feed himself.

TL;DR His mom is a drug addict liar like his father and they’ve always been willing to use their kids as ammo to get what they want. This letter is no different.
 
It will very likely keep Nick out of prison, because judges want to avoid punishing children for their parent's mistakes if anyway possible.

Presumably, that's why the pre-sentencing report recommended that Nick serve 30 days. It's enough of a 'taste' of prison to have a deterrent effect for the future, while being minimally disruptive of his family.

It's not as though Nick is the sole parent. And Kayla has sufficient support, both financial and emotional in the form of a local family who can help out over that 30 days so there isn't going to be any real hardship. It's not like Rekieta is going out and grinding a 9 to 5 to put food on the table, is it?

By and large, I'm a long term supporter of the view that the state has no business telling people what they can and can't do with their own bodies. Also, historically, I think the USA has been savage in deploying ridiculously long prison sentences for relatively minor offences of drug possession.

But if I set those things aside and ignore the fact that I've spent way too much time pointing and laughing at Nick's antics and try to be objective for a moment, in all seriousness I don't think 30 days in prison is a bad outcome for Nick. It's the smallest of custodial sentences. Nevertheless, it points Nick at a likely future if he continues to go down the road he's going down, making the consequences of his actions real in ways that probation and/or community service sentences can't manage.

Seriously.I believe the judge will be doing Nick a solid if he sends him down the stairs when he shows up in the dock next week.
 
Most kids can rustle up their own meal unaided and I think we have to give the kid the benefit of the doubt.
Unfortunately the only evidence we have is that the Rekieta family tree can only sprout and attract compete and utter tards, as evidenced by Nick, Kayla, his parents, and the rest.

I find it pointless to speculate on the kids, people are projecting a lot onto the (now 17 year old) eldest kid and have been for a while. I don’t get it, but either way it’s more worthwhile to just criticise it at face value e.g. the parent-ification that Nick bragged about, the general state of their parenting and how that objectively would impact them, rather than the kid as a person.

As an aside, Kayla included the 11pm meals to make Nick seem like a super attentive and chill father their kids can ask anything of. In reality it’s almost a guarantee this has only happened a few times and she’s playing it up to the court.
 
So if I was Rekieta,

I would want to get rid of the jail time absolutely. Community service? Fine, Probation? Fine.
But Rekieta is a fucking druggie, silver-spooned, narcissist.
So he'll try his best to get the probation down as low as possible, and he'd HATE to do community service. That's for commoners and poors.
I wonder if he'd legit take jail time but a lesser probation and no community service instead. Then he could brag about how hard he was cause he sat in a county cell for a week or two.
 
Back
Top Bottom