💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Grotesque Bushes]

Is Aaron planning on running a gofundme to cover the full amount he has to pay to the state?

 

[keke]

"Maybe I did some coke, but it was only for fun and I could stop at any time. I was never an addict."

“Yeah the government just came and arrested me because I’m just too fucking cool” — which is genuinely what Nick has been peddling. Part of his story is it was just too much fun partying and doing drugs, and he’s sorry for being too awesome.

Well Nick. Guess Aaron was having too much fun screwing your wife. The tummy-tuck and breast augmentation you paid for really boosted her confidence, considering she takes her previously “destroyed” body to all these nude resorts, which for some reason included the room Aaron was doing his live show from. Really smart.

 

[dustnight]

Do you think illegally accessing someone's google account, YouTube account, bank accounts and sharing data, files and pictures with other people is not a crime?

Aaron was just convicted for sending a single picture to a friend.

What makes you think these clear and obvious violations of federal law would not result in ANY consequences?
You do not even have to speculate if they happened, they admitted it straight up in their effort to destroy Aaron.

What's a little wire fraud among friends?

 

[Oxyjen]

One day one of your videos will be played live in front of a jury of a Rekieta trial and it will be hilarious.

Thanks for the neat summary.

Meanwhile, at FBI Headquarters…

 

[AnOminous]

Do you think illegally accessing someone's google account, YouTube account, bank accounts and sharing data, files and pictures with other people is not a crime?

I could still see it falling between the cracks, i.e. the feds investigate and aren't interested enough to do anything about it, and the state lacks the sophistication to pursue it. It also isn't a sexy new statute like revenge porn that you can virtue signal about respecting whammens.

It wouldn't be the first time I've seen prosecutors go after some silly-ass bullshit and then completely ignore serious crimes.

 

[Oliver Onions]

I'm not a lawyer, I just looked up the points calculation.

I hope everyone else was imagining the Unreal Tournament announcer while tallying up those points.
FIRST BLOOD
DOMINATING
KILLING SPREE
M-M-M-M-MEGA CUCKED
You have lost the case

 

[Mr.Bucket]

I could still see it falling between the cracks, i.e. the feds investigate and aren't interested enough to do anything about it, and the state lacks the sophistication to pursue it. It also isn't a sexy new statute like revenge porn that you can virtue signal about respecting whammens.

It wouldn't be the first time I've seen prosecutors go after some silly-ass bullshit and then completely ignore serious crimes.

That's what I'm getting at. Right now Aaron has been the most legally punished out of them all.

Rekieta basically is skirting free on having almost an oz of coke and his child testing positive for it. So I wouldn't be surprised if he gets less than a slap on the wrist for this as well.
Even if it's just monetary fees we all know he won't be footing the bill for those.

 

[AnOminous]

Nice post, @Sneed Force One. I’ve used your timeline and added some other things I’ve archived along this saga, then made this video:

Thanks for suffering through this fat, greasy pedophile. It's disgusting just looking at him and even with double speed playback he talks like a slow-thinking mental retard. How does anyone stand to watch this lardass?

 

[Melty Butter]

I am in awe of your talent, @Third World Aristocrat. If there were justice (there's not) on the Internet, it would be required watching for 1) Anyone who has seen a Rekieta stream and 2) Anyone who has logged onto another person's devices.

Nick will likely get two years minimum, possibly up to 7 years if they charge him with that enhancement for witness intimidation. The multiple times and persistence then keeps him on the higher sentencing guideline.

Right, for hacking, but it would surely blow up his adjudicated guilty plea for the coke, correct? Technically, he's pleading to a 3rd degree felony with a maximum of 20 years/$250K. We know that would never happen, but prison for a year or so would be kino.

It wouldn't be the first time I've seen prosecutors go after some silly-ass bullshit and then completely ignore serious crimes.

All this talk of civil suits, mostly from Nick against Aaron (ironically)...

... got me thinking that Aaron should consider filing a civil suit for the hacking. It's fairly common for civil suits to compel criminal charges. Sadly, Aaron will never do that for several reasons:

- His "profession" - it would be deemed a pussy move in the comedy community and dirty his radio job prospects.
- Nick's wealth is protected due to the trust and, I assume, primary homes are protected too. There's no money.
- His mental health. Aaron has said that he wants to move on.

But @ItsAaronIgnoreMe, Monty easily raised $15K, and Schnieder would gladly take the case. Just sayin.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

... got me thinking that Aaron should consider filing a civil suit for the hacking. It's fairly common for civil suits to compel criminal charges. Sadly, Aaron will never do that for several reasons:

If Aaron is aware of an ongoing investigation and is positive it will result in charges being filed, he should hold still and wait for Nick (and those who were forwarded data) to be convicted (or testify against each other), before filing his civil case. It is significantly easier to make your case if you can point at a criminal case that established facts for you.

I also do not see the point wasting money on lawyers when you do not yet have the results of the investigation.

 

[Vibralldo]

Look at all the great legal advice you can get from Nick. It's legal to piss on people's graves. It's legal to deface property. If someone leaves their front door unlocked it's okay to burglarize their house.

What a fucking retard.

Nick's an anti-lawyer
Just do whatever the opposite of what he advises and you'll always win

Nick will likely get two years minimum, possibly up to 7 years if they charge him with that enhancement for witness intimidation.

Please god, let this happen

It'll be so fucking funny

 

[AnOminous]

But @ItsAaronIgnoreMe, Monty easily raised $15K, and Schnieder would gladly take the case. Just sayin.

The important decision would be whether to pursue it federally or at the state level (no opinion on that personally). The CFAA is federal and has civil remedies. Any judgment in such a case would probably not be dischargeable in bankruptcy because it's an intentional tort (and in fact an outright crime whether or not prosecuted as one).

Anyway, just something to talk to counsel about. They might advise seeing what happens with whatever the feds are doing.

I don't see why he doesn't at the very least file a bar complaint. It's free.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

Right, for hacking, but it would surely blow up his adjudicated guilty plea for the coke, correct? Technically, he's pleading to a 3rd degree felony with a maximum of 20 years/$250K. We know that would never happen, but prison for a year or so would be kino.

As far as I know there is no stipulation that probation is violated only if a crime is committed after sentencing.

Actually, being charged with any new crime while he is on probation is a violation of remain law abiding, even if he committed the crime before sentencing, as far as I can see.

 

[Vibralldo]

Great work @Third World Aristocrat

A group of retards publicly bragging about committing a federal crime and then literally trying to let as many people know as possible

Incredible

 

[Captain Manning]

“Yeah the government just came and arrested me because I’m just too fucking cool” — which is genuinely what Nick has been peddling. Part of his story is it was just too much fun partying and doing drugs, and he’s sorry for being too awesome.

In case you haven't noticed, his new audience is almost all lolberts. That argument resonates with them. People like Grifty and CGoody. They think drugs should be legal. He's going with that argument because he is a fellow traveler, but also because that is the only group that is willing to give him any modicum of sympathy now.

I like the libertarians that bitch about things like Civil Asset Forfeiture. Which isn't even really a "libertarian issue," but more of a "how the fuck is it still legal for the government to do this?" issue.

The ones that bitch about roads, and taxes, and the age of consent, and DRUGS are almost always unhinged fags. Like Nick.

(Null is generally pretty libertarian, but once said on MATI has said he can't identify as one because of all the idiocy surrounding the label, and I think that's a smart move).

 

[Potentially Criminal]

As far as I know there is no stipulation that probation is violated only if a crime is committed after sentencing.

Actually, being charged with any new crime while he is on probation is a violation of remain law abiding, even if he committed the crime before sentencing, as far as I can see.

It's a general principle that prior criminal activity getting charged doesn't trigger a Probation Violation. Not saying it doesn't happen, but it shouldn't.

I've never seen this happen, and it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant, especially if our goal is to change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking.

 

[Gobermental Supervisor]

it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant

I am sure we can make an exception for a particularly obnoxious non-lawyer from rural Minnesota.

 

[Melty Butter]

It's a general principle that prior criminal activity getting charged doesn't trigger a Probation Violation. Not saying it doesn't happen, but it shouldn't.

I've never seen this happen, and it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant, especially if our goal is to change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking.

I get that, and I know I'm reaching, but bear with me... The hacking intent was to intimidate a witness in Nick's possession case. (Nick would say otherwise, but that's easily disputed.) In an ideal world, it's hard to imagine that it couldn't topple his cushy plea for possession.

 

[Kipersonapiscesotter]

It's a general principle that prior criminal activity getting charged doesn't trigger a Probation Violation. Not saying it doesn't happen, but it shouldn't.

I've never seen this happen, and it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant, especially if our goal is to change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking.

That makes sense, but I couldn't find it written anywhere.

 

[Midnight Energy Drink]

I've never seen this happen, and it would be fundamentally unfair to the Defendant, especially if our goal is to change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking.

People here almost want to see law stretched as if they fear Rekieta may 'change and alter future conduct and ways of thinking'.