This is actually exactly the point, someone who chooses to come to a place will not have the same priorities as someone who is just from there and never made a choice about it, the former is weighing some kind of material advantage, the latter has a blood-and-soil attachment. If shit ever really hits the fan, why would you or your children stay and fight and die if you have the option to just fuck off to Israel? With that in mind, how can you possibly claim to care as much as someone that has no other options, was born on this land, and will die on it? And how can you be a patriot if your allegiance is split between two homes, what happens when one home needs 100% of your support instead of 50%, or when the interests of the two come into conflict? Dual loyalty is a myth
Yes, but how do you think you get people to sign up for that system? How do you think you get people to start advocating for a system like that? You have to groom them. You use arguments like the ones you made. You have to first present a perceived logical fallacy of the current world order. Which in modern day is very simple. You start by going to young people and asking them things like "Why is an athlete getting paid millions why scientists curing cancer only getting maybe 100-150k? Heck, aren't janitors even worth more than someone playing Niggerball?". Then slowly inch them into "janitors and athletes should be paid the same", and because they're dumb kids, they don't think that through. That's how you start getting people indoctrinated into Communism. You ask midwit tier questions without offering an explanation for why and how things are. It's a lie by omission. That's why Mao Zedong instructed each and every one of his disciples to become college professors because it was easy to groom and mold young minds with lies by omissions. You can easily trick those who don't understand the way the world works with perceived fallacies.
I'm not saying they don't cheat their employees. How would you propose you fix this? Likely with legislation, but whatever legislation you introduce will only further Communistic goals. I am saying this because your line of thinking is dangerous and how you slide into becoming Commiefornia. The best way to tackle of these issues is to teach young people how to navigate the world that currently exists. Your bosses don't appreciate their workers? Then workers don't have to appreciate their bosses. That's why you have stuff like Quiet Quitting happening. That's why millennials don't stay loyal to companies for 5-10 years anymore. They adapted to navigating this world. If you're going to say "That's not how the world should be though", then you're no different than any Marxist and your logical end step will always have you on the side of Marxism.
What a retard. All he has to do is agree now and take it back later if he's going to be a shyster about it. Z really is a creature of ego and pride before anything else.
Great, so you'd have no problems renouncing your israeli citizenship then?
I am saying we have a wealth of knowledge available, and we should use it.
what sort of super breed autism are you?
No surprise from (((Zelensky)))
I will be on Israel’s side because they’ll win.
Home gym is the way to go. Could never stand going to gyms especially now that the only ones nearby are faggy shit like planet fatness.
shut up and give me your lunch money nerd
I can’t believe we are going to have ten pages of @Catch The Rainbow defending this (I kid, Ukrainians are more like Gypsy’s than Jews. A Jew will try to not piss off their Golden Goose).
I never understand men who hate sports. like at the very least, know the rules to one or two so you don't look like a dunce at the super bowl party.
I am not smearing anyone. I had nothing to do with the creation of institutional distrust of Jews in 19th century Germany.
Well what the hell else am I supposed to call it? There's like at least 4 different ball sports I'd have to keep track of, way too much
This is Jew to me. I'll let myself out.
man it's not that hard!
The goal of public debate is convincing the audience. Sometimes, the debaters are also part of the audience, and can be swayed by arguments; sometimes.