Mr Greer said he would still make the call, but wanted to know if Mr Moon was privately recording the conversations and posting them onto his website.
Something you can easily verify yourself and not a valid justification for refusing to progress your own case.
Greer does not appreciate the conversations between Hardin and Greer being posted onto Kiwi Farms
The conversations are accessible regardless of whether they're on the Farms or not. Precisely how much did you learn in Paralegal school?
Mr Hardin has threatened to file sanctions against Greer for simply wanting their conversations to remain private.
No, he threatened sanctions for you continuing to misappropriate the SPO. In the interests of justice, court filings should be as accessible as reasonably possible. You wouldn't want people assuming that Ariana Grande
wasn't a big fat meanie based on court records they can't see, right?
Hardin said he would withdraw his motion, depending on how he likes Greer's response.
Correct. Promising to provide relevant material and then
not doing that sounds sanctionable to me.
defendant's want information regarding cases filed that have nothing to do with copyrights or intellectual property.
It's absolutely relevant. You just don't understand how.
This Court has already dismissed non-copyright claims, so it's unfair for plaintiff to have to provide irrelevant information
Your non-existent restraining order against Jersh is relevant, according to you.
DEFENDANTS HAVE BEEN THE ONLY WEBSITE TO NOT COMPLY WITH A DMCA TAKEDOWN REQUEST
Demonstrably false.
This case would have never been filed had Moon simply just removed Plaintiff's copyrights and just simply removed Greer from the kiwi farms website
The Farms isn't hosting infringing material. The mocking will continue until the clownery ceases.
Plaintiff did kindly go out of his way and did provide a "litigation history" document
Incomplete and did not contain relevant documents. You are in the unique position of knowing precisely how many frivolous lawsuits you've brought. It's also as "burdensome" for you to access PACER as it is for anyone else.
Granting the 10th Circuit precedent, which has a strong history of being against fishing expeditions
Threatening to tattle to the 10th about your gross misunderstanding of the law again.
The judge is sure to be receptive to this knee jerk horse shit, Russ. Keep going!
