Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
"This is the only copyright case plaintiff has ever filed"

Why should I believe that when I don't even have a list of cases you've been involved in? For all I know you have 100 more copyright cases.
 
There's a simple fucking thing Greer could do, that is painfully obvious, because anyone who has ever even seen part of a courthouse knows it, and yet he categorically refuses to do it.

It's hilarious. I'm not going to mention it because he's probably stupid enough to not realize it, as opposed to actively choosing not to do it.
There's a lot of people who have actually never really been to their local court house and wouldnt know...and most who have just go straight to wherever you get whatever permit/pay traffic ticket and leave, so I'm not surprised if even people following this thread dont know what you're talking about because they've never observed a live trial or walked around outside their courthouse to see it.

1740066495422.png
You have to go to the court yard to find it typically.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
He was sent it on Jan. 29, 2025 by Mr. Hardin

Guarantee he didn't remember that conversation. Plus, there's a new supplement on it for today.

Bold of you to assume that means he ever read it

He responded to it at the time, threatening Hardin with sanctions of his own. "Don't sanction me and I won't sanction you" is approximately how it went.
 
Mr Greer said he would still make the call, but wanted to know if Mr Moon was privately recording the conversations and posting them onto his website.
Something you can easily verify yourself and not a valid justification for refusing to progress your own case.

Greer does not appreciate the conversations between Hardin and Greer being posted onto Kiwi Farms
The conversations are accessible regardless of whether they're on the Farms or not. Precisely how much did you learn in Paralegal school?

Mr Hardin has threatened to file sanctions against Greer for simply wanting their conversations to remain private.
No, he threatened sanctions for you continuing to misappropriate the SPO. In the interests of justice, court filings should be as accessible as reasonably possible. You wouldn't want people assuming that Ariana Grande wasn't a big fat meanie based on court records they can't see, right?

Hardin said he would withdraw his motion, depending on how he likes Greer's response.
Correct. Promising to provide relevant material and then not doing that sounds sanctionable to me.

defendant's want information regarding cases filed that have nothing to do with copyrights or intellectual property.
It's absolutely relevant. You just don't understand how.

This Court has already dismissed non-copyright claims, so it's unfair for plaintiff to have to provide irrelevant information
Your non-existent restraining order against Jersh is relevant, according to you.

DEFENDANTS HAVE BEEN THE ONLY WEBSITE TO NOT COMPLY WITH A DMCA TAKEDOWN REQUEST
Demonstrably false.

This case would have never been filed had Moon simply just removed Plaintiff's copyrights and just simply removed Greer from the kiwi farms website
The Farms isn't hosting infringing material. The mocking will continue until the clownery ceases.

Plaintiff did kindly go out of his way and did provide a "litigation history" document
Incomplete and did not contain relevant documents. You are in the unique position of knowing precisely how many frivolous lawsuits you've brought. It's also as "burdensome" for you to access PACER as it is for anyone else.

Granting the 10th Circuit precedent, which has a strong history of being against fishing expeditions
Threatening to tattle to the 10th about your gross misunderstanding of the law again.

The judge is sure to be receptive to this knee jerk horse shit, Russ. Keep going! :story:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Surely if Messrs. Hardin or Moon were to be posting non-public stuff about the case to the Internet then Greer could provide examples of it and attach it to his filings, right? Right?
 
1740068474158.png

🌈🌈🌈🌈🌈
I don't suppose Hardin could bring this up, along with quotes from Russ himself saying that he doesn't check his e-mail because of how busy he is? Would the judge even give a shit?
 
Defendant's REPEATED requests for documentation regarding Plaintiff's history of vexatious litigation is an abuse of the court's time and resources and is frankly irrelevant to Plaintiff's current undertaking of vexatious litigation, as stated in case Just believe me Vs Clearly defined Rules & Regulations. Defendant's pet attack dog continually harasses Plaintiff for documents and responses without realizing that Plaintiff IS TOO BUSY TO DEAL WITH THIS. Plaintiff simply cannot sit down for a set amount of time, do research regarding relevant case law, construct a reasonable argument with that knowledge and then file it prior to a deadline. Defendant has no idea how many models there are on Instagram and LinkedIn, and Plaintiff has a duty to contact every one of them multiple times. Defendant's incessant filings regarding this case is interfering with Plaintiff's ability to live a meaningful life by forcing him to acknowledge and submit these knee-jerk reaction filings explaining why he is not participating in his litigation in a meaningful or productive way, Defendant is forcing the Plaintiff to break the rules by telling him to obey them.
 
Back
Top Bottom