Liz Fong-Jones / 方禮真 / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey / Honeycomb.io Field CTO - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Over 900 pages and no one has suggested putting Fonger's ugly mug on a tiki mug? C'mon, his face was made for something like this:
uglytikimug.jpg
There are even uglier versions which the internet will graciously show you if you ask.
 
Even though we face the difficulties of today and tomorrow, I still have a dream. I have a dream that my little trannies will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the extent of their mutilating surgeries or crude mockery of nature but by the content of their dishonorable, untruthful, undisciplined, selfish, and false character.

Why not both?
 
Dishonorable: you raped someone and are trying to hide it.
Untruthful: you lie about this site, Josh, and the users.
Undisciplined: you pay people to hard work for you
Selfish: Wasn't that what your mother said when you were making the ancestors cry by becoming a eunuch. You are trying to destroy the Internet to force into what you want.
False: You are a man pretending to be a woman

I'm sure others can come up with more examples of your malevolent (emphasis on male) ways.
Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
 
I love troons like this realizing that society has grown entirely sick of troons and troonery, while still being completely oblivious that it is the behavior of troons that has resulted in this backlash.
Acknowledging their own culpability would bring the entire facade crashing down.

It's not obliviousness, it's denial of that culpability, and it's very much their defense mechanism.

Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
LFG has gone on record, multiple times, with having a "consent accident." Given that one of Fong Dongless' big "things" is attempting to intimidate people, especially people who LFG thinks can be easily pressured, the natural takeaway is that this consent accident was exactly what we think it is. The fact that Jones has gone fucking nuclear to try to get that particular factoid stricken from the internet says volumes.
 
Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.

Does LFJ really believe KF baits trannies into suicide? A post-truth society cuts both ways.
 
I'm always amazed when someone admits this. They're literally admitting they're subhuman, they're beneath vermin, they're on the level of an insect.

If you were this repulsive and pathetic, why would you admit it?

Anyone who has no internal narrative is a subhuman piece of shit who should be gassed to improve the human race. What an utterly vile creature Erriot is.
Timely reminder that this untermenschen has no internal monologue, no actual thoughts besides breathing, raping and dilation.

Elliot, from the little I've seen, you're one of the most disgusting faggots out there. You have the exceptional ability to waste your precious time on this earth going on a wild goose chase to take down a fucking gossip site that you dislike, wasting your own wealth and the final sighted years of your life. I hope you find the darkness too much to bear and 41% yourself, although I'm fairly sure the brick jaw would break through the rope.

TTD
 
Something tells me in the wake of the pendulum swing Elliott's going to have a very hard time pulling off his little "girl talk" trick again to get what he wants.
 
Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
You may not have the greatest social awareness or ability to pick up on deceitful verbal and linguistic cues.
If you take everything at face value, or succumb to overly black and white thinking, then you may find people take advantage of your gullible or otherwise good nature.
You're the perfect audience for Liz, plenty of people with your disposition in the tech world.
 
Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
What is a "consent accident"

if we are to #believe all victims and the victims thinks they were raped, then by Elliot's standards he raped that person. Now the full details seem to have been lost/suppressed before they were archived. I'm also sure Elliot used his influence to silence his victims like he has attempted to do with Josh and KiwiFarms.
 
Do people actually believe they r*ped someone? I looked into it and it seems like they got accused of purposefully having dog hair on them when they had sex with someone who was afraid of dogs. I understand hating them, but its dishonest to say they raped someone based on what is in the thread.
I absolutely think he RAPED someone. Maybe you could get me on a technicality that it was a mere sexual assault and he didn't go all Brando with the butter on some woman, but by his own words he was accused of assault and his main frustration was that she stopped contact with him but wasn't keeping quiet about it. Which despite his claims of her publicly smearing him, as far as I know whatever her side of the story is hasn't been revealed to the public at large, so all we have to go on is his innocuous dog hair explanation but simultaneously it is an act that he calls a mistake that he will regret for the rest of his life. The person we suspect it might have been has even dropped from the internet as a whole, so I suppose he must have been successful in girl talking her into keeping quiet somehow.
As much as we mock the "concent accident" term, I really don't know how else to interpret than "I am a rapist", especially when he views it as the inevitable in risky fetishes.
 
Becky claimed that she's having financial difficulties and started e-begging on Bluesky:
"Help I'm a poow wittwe wetawd, I can't make a money :("
*2 posts later*
"Ugh see I can't even afford to take my 3 heckin doggos to the vet"
Tf is wrong with these people. I do alright for myself and I'm sure as hell not going to get a dog because I know it's fucking expensive, I couldn't imagine actively choosing to own 3 while being a fucking bum with no source of income whatsoever. It's the same energy as "I can't afford to live in le capitalist dystopia" *has Netflix, Spotify, Hulu, gets Starbucks twice a day, goes through a disposable vape a day* etc. except it's worse because they have living beings relying on them.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom