David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC. Case: 2:24-CV-00140, Southern District of West Virginia. - Acerthorn sues the Farms

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Stebbins v. Moon 2:24-cv-00140 — District Court, S.D. West Virginia

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00140
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. West Virginia
  • Filed
    Mar 20, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:101 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    May 6, 2026

Parties (3)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Lolcow LLC, David Stebbins

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
47 May 6, 2026 ORDER OF 4CCA as to 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1556. The court grants leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (cmb)
46 May 6, 2026 NOTICE OF APPELLATE CASE OPENING BY 4CCA re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1556. Case Manager: C. Halupa. (cmb)
45 May 4, 2026 RECORD REQUEST in 4CCA Case Number 26-1556. (skm)
44 May 4, 2026 NOTICE OF APPELLATE CASE OPENING BY 4CCA re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA in 4CCA Case No. 26-1556. Case Manager: C. Halupa. (skm)
43 May 3, 2026 TRANSMITTAL OF NOTICE OF APPEAL TO 4CCA via APPEAL TRANSMITTAL SHEET re: 42 Notice of Appeal to 4CCA. (lca)

In re: David Stebbins 26-1398 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-1398
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Filed
    Apr 6, 2026
  • Last Filing
    May 4, 2026

Parties (1)

Parties
In re: DAVID A. STEBBINS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 17)

# Date Description Filing
17 May 4, 2026 RESPONSE/ANSWER by David A. Stebbins to Motion to dismiss appeal [15]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001972939] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 05/05/2026 12:58 AM]
16 Apr 29, 2026 RESPONSE/ANSWER by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to Motion to strike [14]. Nature of response: in opposition. [1001971074] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/30/2026 09:12 PM]
15 Apr 28, 2026 MOTION by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to dismiss appeal [15]. Date and method of service: 04/29/2026 ecf. [1001969770] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/29/2026 12:56 PM]
14 Apr 22, 2026 MOTION by David A. Stebbins to strike brief Motion to Strike Docket Entry #13, the Defendant's Reply to my Response to their Motion to Reconsider.. Date and method of service: 04/23/2026 ecf. [1001965881] [26-1398] David Stebbins [Entered: 04/23/2026 12:50 PM]
13 Apr 22, 2026 REPLY by Lolcow LLC and Joshua Moon to response [12].. [1001965846] [26-1398] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 04/23/2026 12:16 PM]

David Stebbins v. Joshua Moon 26-1556 — Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    26-1556
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • Filed
    May 4, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    May 6, 2026

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 16)

# Date Description Filing
16 May 6, 2026 NOTICE ISSUED to David A. Stebbins requesting response to Motion to reconsider [15]. Response due 05/18/2026.[1001974896].. [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/07/2026 11:47 AM]
15 May 6, 2026 MOTION by Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC to reconsider Order [12]. Date and method of service: 05/07/2026 ecf. [1001974873] [26-1556] Matthew Hardin [Entered: 05/07/2026 11:34 AM]
14 May 6, 2026 ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to remand case filed by Appellees Joshua Moon and Lolcow LLC [7]. Copies to all parties. [1001974770] [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/07/2026 10:11 AM]
13 May 6, 2026 ORDER filed deferring action on Motion to appoint/assign counsel filed by Appellant David A. Stebbins [8]; administratively terminating Motion for temporary administrative stay [8]. Copies to all parties. [1001974762] [26-1556]--[Edited 05/07/2026 by CH--to modify docket text] CH [Entered: 05/07/2026 10:05 AM]
12 May 6, 2026 ORDER filed granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis [10]. Copies to all parties. [1001974758] [26-1556] CH [Entered: 05/07/2026 10:01 AM]
Hmm, seems he hasn't filed with the Surpreme Court yet to force the Circuit court to force the District court to do something.
 
I actually wish he would, even I am getting sick of this nothingness.

Yes I know it's a completely retarded case that will get tossed out the moment it gets looked at but...can we just at least look at it? I want more of Acerthorn sperging out and when he does his whole appeal the appeal of the appeal shtick it won't cost Jersh anything and we get more of his insane drivel to laugh at.

I know Stabby has got lots on his plate at the moment with like 5 other lolsuits going at the same time and now he's busy fighting sanctions but still come on dude give the court another poke and see what happens.
 
Yes I know it's a completely retarded case that will get tossed out the moment it gets looked at but...can we just at least look at it?

This case is getting as much attention as it deserves. As much as retarded court filings are fun to gawk at, there's enough action in the Greer lawsuit that Hardin/Null should be thankful that this case isn't moving very fast. There's a limit to how much of a lawyer's time can be wasted dealing with lolsuits.

Stabby should be thankful as well, though for different reasons. I'm sure that he'll stupidly poke the bear again once his other cases require less immediate attention.
 
Access to e-filing denied.
In Forma Pauperis recommended to be denied. Magi suggests pay costs ($400) or dismissal.

Based Black Magistrate coming through. The determination is particularly venomous and outlines the court's contempt for Stebbins.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Oh yeah!

Based Magistrate ftw. now for the standard Stabby appeal routine.

@Null
After this gets thrown out I really recommend paying Hardin to get a vex lit slapped on Mr Stabby. he won't stop until you make him stop, his cases cost him nothing to file and he's judgment proof since he lives on SSI and owns nothing.
 
Access to e-filing denied.
In Forma Pauperis denied. Pay costs ($400) or dismissal.
That is unfortunately incorrect. The Magistrate merely recommended that directly to the District Judge, and it is up to him to adopt it first.
Screenshot 2025-01-27 224729.png
That said, I found this part interesting from the order:
Screenshot 2025-01-27 223313.png
Rare case where a Judge admits to being wrong (in their own way)
 
Last edited:
This was a great read.

The judge had a lot to say about Stabby's past litigation history.
steb1.png
steb4 - ouch.png

I laughed that the judge quoted this post.
steb3.png
No, he's just a fat smug condescending prick and he uses the court system to harass people into submission. He seems like a really sad, vacuous old man rotting in his decrepit apartment.

He seemed very pissed about Stabby's conduct with his clerk, and the judge commented on some things that made it seem like he doesn't see much merit in this copyright claim.
steb6 - ouch.png
steb7 - ouch.png
 
Yeesh, this judge ain’t having none of it. Seeing as how the judge’s recommendation is likely to be adopted, and Stabbin’s can’t afford the filing fees, I’m gonna say this case is dead in the water.

West Virginia stays winning.
 
Based Black Magistrate coming through. The determination is particularly venomous and outlines the court's contempt for Stebbins.
It's nice to see a no-nonsense judge for a goddamn change.
Yeesh, this judge ain’t having none of it.
The judge also resoundingly rejects the "REEEEE Kiwi Farms bad" non-argument the idiot Tenth Circuit panel wholeheartedly endorsed despite its complete irrelevance to copyright.
 
Ooof that was quite the smack down! going forward Stabby is going to find it much harder to get IFP status thanks to this Magistrate laying everything out like this.

Mann Stabby must have really cheesed of this magistrate.

I guess;

threatening his clerks
recording every phone call and posting it to Jew Tube
trying to get people fired for doing their job
trying to get the magistrate censured
trying to mandamus the court
being a asshole to everyone he talked to or dealt with
filing formal complaints at every turn
and
being a arrogant, condescending little bitch in his many many many filings


and after all of that he still lost!

Truly the US Justice System is broken.

Jokes aside luckly for Jersh there is no chance Stabby has the funds to continue this lolsuit and with his charming personality he's got no one to turn to for aid.
 
the gobbling must be glorious!

regarding the ifp application (first from ecf 23, second from ecf 24):
1738011991464.png
1738012598762.png

regarding stebbins' documented history of fifty different case filings (emphasis is the court's, not mine):
1738012036234.png

regarding stebbins' inevitable next move:
1738012556697.png

there's a brilliant bit in the recommendation that i won't post, but that i anticipate will end this case.
i cannot wait to read stebbins' response. too bad that we'll have to wait for it to arrive by mail! lol.
 
Jokes aside luckly for Jersh there is no chance Stabby has the funds to continue this lolsuit and with his charming personality he's got no one to turn to for aid.
I think we know that with 99% certainty that Stabby is going to pull out the crayons and file another appeal with the Circuit Court.
I suspect part of this document tearing Stabby apart is so the appeal can be trivially round filed.
 
It seems to me that when the judge is using italics for emphasis when describing your behavior, you're in the shit.
 
If Stabbins has to pay and does not, will this be dismissed with prejudice?
You could read the document, I know that's not fun though.

2025-01-27_14-37.png
"without prejudice"

Obviously the District Court Judge could modify that or make any other changes he wishes or ignore the recommendation completely.
 
Back
Top Bottom