📚 Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

[Dang dirty Pidgeons!]

Weird gender chimera with a disfiguring birth defect claims that he in some way proves that male perverts with a fetish are real women, just by his mere existence.

yeah, I am not sure where exactly I heard that the first time around, but I think that - the XXY thing - was once a pretty common "tranny" condition. It's not really intersex, because those are fully formed males, they just rubber-stamped trannies who had it, more readily. I'm 100% that some glossy tranny editorials from long ago, had that condition mentioned more than a few times. I'm surprised that I didn't see more of those on here. Good one.
And batshit crazy like all troons - extra X or not.

Also: press X on him having giga estrogen - where from?
I like how he started out with saying he has no balls and then immediately rolls it back to they're "really small". Normally, if you weren't MENTALLY ill, you'd think people with abnormal testes would worry about osteoporosis or something - like worry about being healthy with your inborn boob-twink condition - but no, he caught the tranny contagion and wants them gone altogether...

Edit:
Yeah, he's not even one of the rare boob-twink variety:

He also thinks he might have ovaries. While it's theoretically possible to end up with ovotestes in this scenario and you can get 46 XX/47 XXY mosaicism (although 46 XY/47 XXY is way more common IIRC), if his body never produced testosterone at all then he'd almost certainly not have been surprised that he was intersex, since a complete absence of testosterone and an excess of estrogen would have meant he never developed most male sexual characteristics in a manner similar to CAIS women. Instead, he looks like this:

Literally a normal moid with lowered fertility and certainly not "zero testosterone"
You know, like just run of the mill klinefelter syndrome.
He certainly once produced enough for going through puberty - maybe now it's near zero for whatever reason, but I would concur with the implication that he's just indulging in tranny make believe.

 

[Nico]

View attachment 6884764

Seems it's common for lesbian pooner's to not only have relationships, but for their girlfriend to want to have sex with a man or become polygamist.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ftm/s/rcVK3fF30N

I'll say this again, especially after a bit more deepdiving, it's fascinating how whenever you see either a lesbian or just a female dating a FtM if they cheat on their partners they will always go for cismen, either the cock is simply too strong to be beaten or perhaps there's an element of humiliation against their partner behind it, either way I find it extremely fascinating.

 

[AssignedEva]

I'm probably crediting these people with awareness that they almost certainly don't possess when I say there's no way they're this retarded. I've often speculated that trannies only think 'I pass because I don't get misgendered' because they all have main character syndrome and truly believe that people who aren't them are incapable of thinking things without saying them out loud. It's posts like this that further cement that belief.

Autism. I'm not kidding, this is a facet of autism, they struggle with perspective taking. There's a test they use to measure cognitive milestones which goes something like this:

Jacob puts a snack in a bowl and leaves the room. While he’s gone, his mother walks in and puts the snack in the refrigerator, then leaves. When Jacob returns, where does he look for the snack?

The answer is obviously the bowl, because he doesn't know Mum put it in the fridge. But young children, and developmentally delayed older children and autistic children, will often say "the refrigerator" because struggle to understand that Jacob doesn't know what they know. This is also why they tend to be bad at lying - "Did you open the box and eat the cookie that was in there?", "No I didn't open the box and I wouldn't have eaten it anyway, I don't like oatmeal raisin cookies", "How did you know it was an oatmeal raisin cookie if you didn't open the box?". They know that it's possible to deceive people, but struggle to parse what it is they need to lie about in order to be convincing.

Couple that with face blindness - about a third of autistic people struggle with face blindness. They can't recognise people from their faces very easily, and will go off things like hairstyle to differentiate between people. In that scenario, an autistic person might understand what looking like a woman is through various cues like long hair, makeup and dresses. They're also more likely to follow prescriptive rules in understanding the world (i.e. "if you go on HRT and have long hair and wear makeup and dresses, then you will look like a woman"). So for them they think they look like women, and people around them gender them correctly so surely that means they must pass. The idea that people are humouring them literally doesn't occur to them.

 

[Dang dirty Pidgeons!]

Oh, what the hell, just going to post this, it's a funnytranny.
I guess it's still an L, since he and the other one (under the spoiler) ARE hons:

Spoiler: 2 more

These are especially high on the self awareness, will they develop problem solving next?

Spoiler: looking for the staff's bathroom while predating kids on the side

Sorry, I had to. I apologize, if it's not enough of an L but those two made me laugh ... and cringe.

 

[Dang dirty Pidgeons!]

The answer is obviously the bowl, because he doesn't know Mum put it in the fridge. But young children, and developmentally delayed older children and autistic children, will often say "the refrigerator" because struggle to understand that Jacob doesn't know what they know.

See, that's what I don't like about these questionnaires, I would've probably said something like: "I can't say, is it normal for his mom to put food left in the open, into the fridge?" I can see someone (esp. children) skipping over the obvious assumption that he looks wherever the bowl was left, first, because that's what you do in natural conversation, you skip over details which you assume are obvious. I always had the hunch these questions are sometimes intentional 3D chess to get more false positives... so it depends a lot on the person interpreting the responses.
Still fascinating, none the less.

The oatmeal cookie scenario you came up with seems pretty damning, tho.

Whoops, double post. Failed the autism test there myself...

 

[Aunt Carol]

Emotions are a woman thing, men just look sorta constipated all the time.

Based and Parappa-pilled.

 

[popsoda]

Wait a minute.
You mean to tell me that men have been dressing up and parading as women?
So that bearded gal I was with last weekend wasn't a real woman?

 

[AssignedEva]

See, that's what I don't like about these questionnaires, I would've probably said something like: "I can't say, is it normal for his mom to put food left in the open, into the fridge?" I can see someone (esp. children) skipping over the obvious assumption that he looks wherever the bowl was left, first, because that's what you do in natural conversation, you skip over details which you assume are obvious. I always had the hunch these questions are sometimes intentional 3D chess to get more false positives... so it depends a lot on the person interpreting the responses.
Still fascinating, none the less.

The oatmeal cookie scenario you came up with seems pretty damning, tho.

Whoops, double post. Failed the autism test there myself...

They do factor that in - they'll dig into the child's reasoning; this was an abridged version. Another example is "Sally and Anne":


They'll ask the kids a couple of questions as in "Where was the marble when Sally left the room?" and "Where is the marble now?" to make sure the kids understand the chain of events and haven't gotten distracted/confused. Then if the child says Sally looks in the box, they'll typically try and understand why - so it'll discount answers like "Sally knows Anne has a marble run, so she's going to the box first to get it out" which obviously isn't a correct answer but doesn't indicate that the kid is struggling with false belief perspective taking, they're just being a little mentalist as young children often are. They're specifically trying to identify children who can't understand that Sally doesn't know Anne (that bitch) moved the marble.

In one experiment they ran this test on three groups: a control group of typically developing children with an average age of four and a half, a control group of children with Down's syndrome with an average age of 10 and then a group of children with autism with an average age of 11. The autistic children had been selected following an IQ test for IQ scores higher than the control groups. 85% of the control groups answered "Where will Sally look for the marble?" correctly, while 80% of the autistic group answered incorrectly and said she'd look in the box. Although autistic children do struggle with pretend play, it's almost certainly a theory of mind issue, to quote one person with autism -

One of my most recurrent problems throughout middle childhood was my constant failure to distinguish between my knowledge and that of others. Very often my parents would miss deadlines or appointments because I failed to tell them of these matters. For instance my parents missed the school's Open House in my fifth grade and my mom asked me afterward, "Why didn't you tell us about it?". "I thought you knew" I replied.

To be clear, autistic people do grow out of this and its use as a diagnostic tool is controversial, plus autism is obviously a spectrum. But it's pretty established that mentalising - understanding how other people are thinking and feeling and using that to understand and predict their behaviour - is something that autistic people struggle with, whether that's sarcasm, understatement or just social mores (like "humour this person"). In fairness it's suggested this goes both ways and we struggle to understand what autistic people are thinking and feeling (the "double empathy" problem) but if you recognise trans people are six times more likely to be autistic, it does explain a lot about these posts going "how did they know????"

 

[Law]

Also pills you on just HOW insanely misogynist even the roots of the idea are, it's all a castration fetish. Just so men don't get afraid of someone even having a clit vaguely approaching just the smallest penis in size - it's insane to think this flew under the radar and was allowed to snowball into what it is now.

Yup. The misogyny, cruelty and lunacy underpinning this movement can't be unseen once you see it. Lupron, the notorious puberty blocker drug, was prescribed to girls with early growth spurts because parents and doctors feared them being too tall.

Autism. I'm not kidding, this is a facet of autism, they struggle with perspective taking. There's a test they use to measure cognitive milestones which goes something like this:

Jackie goes to the bodega and buys a quesadilla. After a child asks if Jackie is a boy or a girl, Jackie goes home to cry for three hours. Where does the quesadilla end up? If you answered "the wall" you might be trans.
All jokes aside, that is really interesting information about autism. I wonder if the rage and meltdowns that some autists experience are a result of them thinking other people should know things that they actually don't.

 

[AssignedEva]

Jackie goes to the bodega and buys a quesadilla. After a child asks if Jackie is a boy or a girl, Jackie goes home to cry for three hours. Where does the quesadilla end up? If you answered "the wall" you might be trans.

I think that might be my favourite thing I've ever discovered through the farms, thank you for reminding me of it. For posterity:

No matter how bad things get, I know I'll never throw a quesadilla at a wall and then write a poem about it.

 

[Slideshow Bill]

CHALLENGE ACCEPTED

View attachment 6879471
link | archive

They can’t, although some give it a red hot go.

Spoiler: text and comments

PintsOfGuinness_

If I managed to make it 39 years without giving a fuck that I was assigned male at birth and all of a sudden I want to grow tits and dress like Avril Lavigne, explain to me how the fuck that's NOT just a mid life crisis?​

Discussion

I've never cared about fashion period and now I can't stop thinking about women's fashion.

What the fuck?

I mean I kind of know the answer, I grew up in a different time, this idea was never a serious option until recently, yadda yadda yadda, but still. What the fuck?

View attachment 6879494View attachment 6879495View attachment 6879497View attachment 6879498

He gets hit with a midlife crisis and now wants to skinwalk a woman he likely had a crush on as a teen. It's getting cliche at this point.

A jealous little pooner feels broken hearted that the woman she's been seeing has been biblically familiar with the differences between male and female bodies. She's a talkative little windbag, so I'll highlight lines I found funniest.

She also started birth control for her hookups, which stings because she doesn’t need it with me.

Why would she start birth control with you? It's not like that plastic rod is going to knock her up with a Cabbage Patch Kid.

So you do the math.

Attracted to males+attracted to females=bisexual

Would you say that being fucked in the ass it's dysphoric? Enjoying sex because we have a prostate should make u dysphoric right? After all cis women don't have a prostate, Doesn't the use of words such as top and bottom make u dysphoric? How is it that a man wanting something up in the ass makes him gay and makes u dysphoric but being fuck in the ass yourself and enjoying prostatic sex (exclusive men thing) does not make you a gay male too?

I never even considered that. Thank you, catty HSTSs, for adding to my transphobic ammo.

I'm sorry if this has already been posted, but I saw this tranny L last night on the American politics thread.

This troon works at a gym and he says now post election people are becoming more bold and a customer complained about him being in the women's changing room. He was informed by management.

View attachment 6896730

https://x.com/DefiantLs/status/1882059989868814493

1000024569.mp4

>Top Ten Videos That Will Make You Go "Women Shouldn't Have Boundaries And Shit"
He subconsciously know that he has no place in the women's locker room but gets upset when others agree. What do these people want? He doesn't want the men's spaces, he wants the women's spaces but knows that he shouldn't be there and will take his guilt and discomfort out on women and he doesn't want his own space because it's not validating.

Excuse me, xaar, but you smell like the bay of Bengal at low tide.

Come on, it was right there.

There were a lot of infants surgically mutilated as a result of doctors trying to make them fit
View attachment 6900123
That's from the 80s, as an awareness piece about what was being done. Babies who were deemed to have clitoromegaly or a micropenis with genital ambiguity were "trimmed down", which frequently lead to a complete destruction of the erogenous zones and incontinence, just to make them "fit". It was appalling.

But it's worth bearing in mind that this is where a lot of trans surgery comes from. John Money's experiment on David Reimer was not notable because he treated a botched circumcision by creating a neovagina... it was notable because it was a twin study. A lot of boys who had botched circumcisions that destroyed their penis had that done to them; John Money's theory was you could make them conform by being heterosexual women if you did surgery, brainwashed them young enough (and sexually abused them) and pumped them full of hormones. The root of transgender understanding is imo Prussians recognising that intersex people exist and then theorising that trans people have a mental intersex condition, which was basically Magnus Hirschfield's rationale which directly fed into Harry Benjamin's rationale (who'd worked closely with Hirschield) who founded what would later become WPATH.

The mutilation of babies is reprehensible but "Phall=O-Meter" got a laugh out of me.

 

[The Poopsmith]

View attachment 6902411
Link

Weird gender chimera with a disfiguring birth defect claims that he in some way proves that male perverts with a fetish are real women, just by his mere existence.

When will these retards understand that XX and XY are the fucking norm (like being born with 2 arms and 5 fingers on each hand) and any deviance from that is just an anomoly? Some people are born with missing or extra arms/legs, some people are born with genetic diseases and some unfortunate people are born with 2 fucking heads. We just understand intuitively that something went a bit wrong during their gestation (and there are a great many things that have the potential to go disastrously wrong during pregnancy for any number of reasons), but that doesn't somehow mean that freaks who get hard when they wear their mom's clothes (who don't even have any sort of chromosomal deformity) are magically now real women.

It's just such a retarded way of thinking, on so many levels. He even mentions that he has Gynecomastia, which is enlarged breasts in males caused by unusual amounts of oestrogen. You're just a fucking weirdo whose mom drank gasoline while she was pregnant. That's it.

Yup, this guy's got extra chromosomes alright! Plus XXY is only diagnosed in males, so he's already got his answer.

 

[Law]

I think that might be my favourite thing I've ever discovered through the farms
View attachment 6904479

It's the funniest thing ever. I should start using "quesadilla thrower" as an insult for ragey transwomen.

This just perfectly captures the trans mindset.
This loathsome man calls a child a bitch. He wears a silk dress and thinks the bodega cashiers give a rip. Talks in a squeaky voice at them (they don't get paid enough for this). Then he seethes at the child's mum, who did nothing wrong, and goes home to waste food. He's mad that his ex has better things to do than think of him, like he's the center of the universe or something, then ends it on a note of pure narcissistic vanity.

 

[The Taco Santo!]

Wait a minute.
You mean to tell me that men have been dressing up and parading as women?
So that bearded gal I was with last weekend wasn't a real woman?

The big throbbing cock didn't clue you in? You knew.

 

[Law]

The big throbbing cock didn't clue you in? You knew.

But the mouthfeel! The mouthfeel!!

 

[Dang dirty Pidgeons!]

Yup. The misogyny, cruelty and lunacy underpinning this movement can't be unseen once you see it. Lupron, the notorious puberty blocker drug, was prescribed to girls with early growth spurts because parents and doctors feared them being too tall.

I picked up on the opposite being argued: that they're afraid the girls remain too small, because the growth plates fuse in puberty. I already sperged on that whole thing. So, which is it? I know that the fusing is triggered by the sex hormones being released, I think... but these blockers halt EVERYTHING, afaik. So, is it about timing? It always sounded weird to me, because these do also block growth hormones, right? Anyhow, I hate how they make this kind of shit sound reasonable at first, when it's really always about school compliance - can't have someone starting puberty at the end of elementary school, since we can't protect kids from eating each other alive to begin with. Great...

 

[Sean Andalou]

Pooner has a "cis" gay boyfriend and ...

Reddit -- Archive

Spoiler: The whole thing.

I (25FtM) am in a new relationship with a cis gay man (27M) who has never been with a trans man before. It’s both of our first relationship in many years and I’m really, really into him, but I have a lot of worries about the physical side of things. He’s said that he isn’t opposed to the idea of having sex with me, just that he isn’t sure how he’ll feel about it yet.

We kissed for the first time last night and things got kind of heavy, but we kept clothes on. Afterwards we were talking about our sexual compatibility and he said that something like vaginal penetration would be easier for him than “getting his face all up in there,” or something to that effect.

His comment has been bothering me a lot since then, and I’m worried about the idea of him finding me repulsive or in general having to force himself to stomach it just because he likes me as a person. I don’t have a lot of bottom dysphoria in isolation (I actually like my setup a lot to be honest), but the idea of my partner finding that part of me gross or unattractive has been bringing up a lot of worry and shame.

Obviously it’s too early to know how he’ll feel about it because we haven’t gotten there yet, but it’s been weighing on me a lot already. I kind of feel like an axe is hanging over my head just waiting to fall. The idea of even trying to have sex with him now or of taking my pants off at all feels a bit overwhelming.

If anyone has any advice or experience with this kind of situation and wants to share I would really appreciate it! Thank you :-)

No answers yet. I'll check later to see if anything else amusing happens.

 

[Caesar]

Based and Parappa-pilled.
View attachment 6903822

Nip! Tuck! Its all in the mind!

 

[AssignedEva]

It's the funniest thing ever.

I was curious about what Jackie looked like, and found him doing a reading of another poem from last year:

I wonder how the child clocked him? Poem below:

This is incredible, it reads like a parody of this sort of poem - gravlax crostini? Banging the DJ at a wedding in a portapotty while the Hamster Dance plays? Fixating on the bride's vagina? Amazingly it ends addressing the very same ex. One more, the dramatic readings really add to it:

I'd unironically buy an anthology if Jackie published one. They're such fantastic unintentional satire of a very specific type of person.

 

[Caesar]

I was curious about what Jackie looked like, and found him doing a reading of another poem from last year:

oh come on, he has a total man face and voice

and what the fuck is this poem fantasy about fucking an investment banker