Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
This case is a constant yo-yo cycle of IT'S SO OVER and WE ARE SO BACK
IMG_20241224_195047.jpg
 
As funny as it would be, I don't see it continuing much longer. Russell is clearly out of gas.
He's not so great when the rubber meets the road.
 
If this case gets dismissed without prejudice, Hardin really deserved one of those personalized frosted glass desk doohickeys with an engraved picture of a ship and the words "The Hardship" on it, something like this: crystal-viking-ship-by-mats-jonasson_799x799.jpg
 
Greer can now report this thread to Roskomnadzor, get it blocked in RUS, and then flee there for political asylum and become a hero.

Unironically probably his best bet right now.
What's the over-under on days before they would drop Russell like a drool bomb into Ukraine rather than put up with his ass any longer?

The combination of Null's unquenchable rage and Hardin's steamroller grind style of litigation is working well.
Don't forget Greer's unfathomable ability to fuck himself in his own ass and snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.
 
The judge can leave Russel hanging for a while, no hurry until at least Hardin's response to Russ wanting to bring the full punitive force of law down on Null over that massive $250 debt that we don't know has been paid or not.
Pretty sure Hardin stated he doesnt need to pay until the current case ends as hardin can potentially win fees that outclass that $250 award.
 
I hope he gets a bulldog clip for Chrismas so he can finally keep his gums moist
 
As funny as it would be, I don't see it continuing much longer. Russell is clearly out of gas.
No doubt the judge will bring a 5 gallon jerry can to Russhole as soon as humanly possible, and this case will continue to drag on for at least another year.
 
Did we ever score a recording of the 11/18 hearing? It looks like the official transcript won't unlock until Feb.
 
One irony regarding Russel's December 23rd briefing I have yet to see mentioned: this briefing was the one filing where Russel should have been able to write a (comparatively) competent response, and he somehow still screws it up. Throughout this entire ordeal, whenever Russel is asked to provide legal argumentation about contributory copyright infringement or civil procedure, he instead writes a sob story about how hard his life is and how it's tough to be a pro se litigant.

However, the December 23rd briefing (where he was ordered to explain why he should not be sanctioned) was a rare exception where describing mitigating factors was the assignment. The judge was not asking for Russel to explain why he was legally justified in not disclosing witnesses and evidence, as the court already ruled he was not. That issue was settled. The assignment was to persuade the judge that he should not be punished. This was the one time in the case where Russel's usual arguments that "I am homeless and lacked resources" or "I am a pro se litigant and don't know how this works" would have been relevant (regardless of whether you find them persuasive).

What does Russel do? He inexplicably picks the filing where these arguments would be relevant as the filing where he does not include them. Instead, he spends the entire text developing incoherent legal arguments.
 
I've theorized before that Russell's adoptive parents didn't bail him out of homelessness because they just don't have the money. His dad's probably out of work if he's in the hospital with Parkinson's, so they can't afford to pay Russell's rent if they're on Social security, and even if they have a real retirement plan like a 401k, they EXTRA can't dip into that because that and it's revenue is the only money they have to live on for the rest of their lives!

Then Russ sends his dad an email telling him he needs to lawyer up.

I'm thinking that may be the main reason his dad told him to do whatever it takes to get them out of this. He isn't going to drain his savings and leave himself and his wife (maybe soon to be widow) bankrupt because Russell wants them to fight the subpoenas he sent their way!
 
I've theorized before that Russell's adoptive parents didn't bail him out of homelessness because they just don't have the money. His dad's probably out of work if he's in the hospital with Parkinson's, so they can't afford to pay Russell's rent if they're on Social security, and even if they have a real retirement plan like a 401k, they EXTRA can't dip into that because that and it's revenue is the only money they have to live on for the rest of their lives!

Then Russ sends his dad an email telling him he needs to lawyer up.

I'm thinking that may be the main reason his dad told him to do whatever it takes to get them out of this. He isn't going to drain his savings and leave himself and his wife (maybe soon to be widow) bankrupt because Russell wants them to fight the subpoenas he sent their way!
My assumption would be his family told him in no uncertain terms to drop the legal nonsense, once and for all.

And just imagine the outcome if Russel had not withdrawn then as witnesses? People with long term firt person knowledge of Russ's decades long crusade of vexatious lawsuits? How exactly would dear old Dad and his brother have testified under oath about all of those?
 
Back
Top Bottom