- Joined
- Dec 10, 2014
I would love to get one of these fuckers to explain in detail how 'trans nonbinary' isn't a fatuous contradiction in terms, with the stipulation that they aren't allowed to invoke any other meaningless gender cult shibboleths in their explanation. "Transgender" is enough of a muddled concept already (as what they should be calling themselves is 'transexual' according to their own rules, as it was them that decided that 'sex' pertains to anatomy and 'gender' is a nebulous social construct), but throwing 'nonbinary' into the mix is compounding it to hitherto unseen levels of nonsensical doublethink.I’ve seen that “transmasc nonbinary” thing before. I think they start out as just “transmasc,” but then they end up going “nonbinary” when they realise they don’t actually want to be a man.
A transman is someone who was born female but became 'male'. A transwoman is the opposite. They clearly exist within and tacitly acknowledge a binary framework by their very nature. Nonbinary people claim to be 'neither male nor female', thus 'transgender' and 'nonbinary' are fundamentally incompatible concepts according to their own definitions. They completely preclude each other. However 'nonbinary' is somehow considered to exist under the umbrella of 'trans identities', in spite of the fact that trans and non-binary cannot logically coexist. It's like grouping flat earthers and round earthers together under the same banner, despite the fact that they believe in diametrically irreconcilable things.
The whole tranny movement is a house of cards built on a foundation of flagrant contradictions. How they've managed to make so much headway in taking over all aspects of culture will forever be a mystery to me, when infants are capable of unpicking their claims.