| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | Aug 6, 2024 | Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf) | |
| 113 | May 15, 2024 | ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024) | |
| 112 | Apr 28, 2024 | NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024) | |
| 111 | Apr 25, 2024 | Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) | |
| 110 | Apr 25, 2024 | NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024) |
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10010936535 | Oct 15, 2023 | Case termination for opinion | |
| 10010794067 | Jan 5, 2023 | [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM] | |
| 10010791785 | Jan 2, 2023 | [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM] | |
| 10010776728 | Dec 1, 2022 | [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM] | |
| 10010776140 | Nov 30, 2022 | [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM] |
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| — | Oct 16, 2024 | ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah) | |
| 132 | Oct 15, 2024 | Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) | |
| 131 | Jul 10, 2024 | AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) | |
| 130 | Jun 10, 2024 | ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) | |
| 129 | Jun 10, 2024 | Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024) |
| # | Date | Description | Filing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 473 | Apr 27, 2026 | RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) | 1 |
| 472 | Apr 14, 2026 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) | 1 |
| 471 | Apr 14, 2026 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) | 1 |
| 470 | Apr 13, 2026 | Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) | |
| 469 | Apr 13, 2026 | MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) | 1 |
I'm hoping we get one of those immediate kneejerk filings he's clearly been sitting on in case his stalling tactics don't work.
They are required to issue threats before acting on them (depending on the severity of the sanction). The purpose is to clearly inform the threatened side that they are walking on a thin line, and to give power to the later-issued sanction. This is ordinarily required for normal litigants (see, for example, Fuentes v. Chavez, 314 F. App'x 143 (10th Cir. 2009) "Rule 41(b) specifically authorizes a district court to dismiss an action for failing to comply with any aspect of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure [...] Employing Rule 41(b) to dismiss a case without prejudice for failure to comply with Rule 8 of course allows the plaintiff another go at trimming the verbiage; accordingly, a district court may, without abusing its discretion, enter such an order without attention to any particular procedures. Dismissing a case with prejudice, however, is a significantly harsher remedy-the death penalty of pleading punishments-and we have held that, for a district court to exercise soundly its discretion in imposing such a result, it must first consider certain criteria. Specifically, "[t]hese criteria include '(1) the degree of actual prejudice to the defendant; (2) the amount of interference with the judicial process; (3) the culpability of the litigant; (4) whether the court warned the party in advance that dismissal of the action would be a likely sanction for noncompliance; and (5) the efficacy of lesser sanctions.'") and to a much higher degree for pro se litigants (Id. "[while talking about dismissal as a sanction] While we are more reluctant to dismiss a pro se plaintiffs complaint with prejudice, as it is more difficult to determine whether he has truly grasped how to cure the defects in his complaint, the court did not simply tell Mr. Fuentes to "comply with the pleading requirements" but told him plainly to add more facts. He did not do so, and his similarly confusing brief before this court suggests another opportunity to amend would be futile as well. There is a limit to how many bites even a pro se plaintiff can have at the apple, and it was not an abuse of discretion for the district court to find that Mr. Fuentes had met that limit.")
I mean, he already has, and the Judge specifically dismissed those arguments. Here's to hoping.
It's ridiculous he thinks Hardin will leak confidential info to the forum. Nigga I'm no expert, but that sounds like something you could get jail time for. I'm glad the Judge is actually getting serious with rusty- feels like this was the plan all along tbhI mean, he already has, and the Judge specifically dismissed those arguments. Here's to hoping.
Me too. It's like having to go to a wedding when you don't really want to and finding an unexpected free bar. Great in the moment, but guarantees nothing for future duty weddings.
Something to look forward to. I mean, Russ is 'a good person', why can't the court see that and just launch Josh into the sun?
No, he thinks Mr. Hardin will tell it to Null (as he should) and then Null will leak it to the forum (and given that I am the only person posting updates of this case, and Null has specifically refused to do it on at least two occasions (as he should) then it's implied that he thinks that either I am Null's alt, or Null is leaking stuff through me (he is not)
Don’t you know that Null runs Kiwifarms and PACER and CourtListener?
I'm pretty sure even the court could figure out if you were a sock. The judge isn't a boomer. That and even if you WERE, that is under the expectation that Josh is retarded and wants to get turbofucked. It literally doesn't make sense no matter how you look at it
So you're Hardin AND Null? I guess that's one way to get around the prohibition against representing an LLC pro se. Actually, isn't there a random text about Joshua Moon not being a real person?
every further filing by russ generates revenue thru pacer fees from people running to read it and only makes null stronger
I thought Putin ran PACER and that's why Jackie can't find the Torswat case
There is. “There is no Joshua Moon. If you think very, very hard, you will actually know who this is. I know you think I'm a tosser, but trust me. You will KNOW.“
Null/Hardin/Useful_Mistake are three separate beings that are at the same time the same being, much in the way of Yaweh.
I don't know whether I should feel honored that you are comparing me to a God, or offended because you are comparing me to a Jewish War God.
Greer will soon develop a version of the Blood Angel's Black Rage where everyone he sees will look like Null after he loses this case.
It's the one thing Greer and I agree on.
