Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[S.C.U.D.]

Finally, Russ will get a chance to explain. Once the judge knows his plights he will surely win.

 

[The I Scream Man]

I absolutely can’t wait to see how Russhole tries to spin this as Josh’s fault somehow

 

[Bogliacci]

I foresee another picture of Hitler in the next filing.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Imagine having the judge firmly in your corner, holding your hand and basically acting as your lawyer, and somehow managing to lose that advantage.

Russell Greer has constantly proven to be his own worst enemy.

 

[Harvey Danger]

It seems to me the judge is being very, very, very careful that when he throws this whole shitheap in the trash where it belongs that the appeals court has no justification to resurrect it.

This is to the detriment of Null's pocketbook, of course, but may make things easier if an appeal occurs.

Yeah, I understand the motivation. I also think there's some pique against the Appeals Court. He probably knows the surviving claim is absurd, and wants it to die as the only "told you so" he has in his power against the higher court.

I meant "building a facade" in the most literal sense: this judge is playing with the case like his own little sandbox, assembling an aesthetic construct of Fully Realized Justice that goes through the expected procedures and winds up in the courtroom. He wants a nice tidy judgement. It's maddening because every single addition to the docket proves it doesn't deserve to be dressed up like that, it deserves to be tossed with prejudice.

Look how clever he thinks he is, playing with his building blocks while the stupid litigants screech at the wise adult:

Although Defendants objected and continue to object to the SPO, they ironically are obtaining a benefit from it in the instant motion because it removes Mr. Greer’s excuse not to comply with disclosure requirements.

Yeah judge, we know. 2000 IQ play there, Your Smugness. But maybe you'll take judicial notice that even though you removed his excuse, Greer fucking did it anyway. And he's going to keep shitting up your docket like a retard while you try and force his square head into your round hole of justice.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

This isn’t Greer vs Null and it hasn’t been for over a year.

It’s Judge vs Appellate Court. Always has been.

 

[RodgerDodger]

I foresee another picture of Hitler in the next filing.

I foresee more plights. And attempts to argue harrassment. With a healthy dose of slander and defamation in legal filings.

This might be the end of it. (Rate me optimistic). Because Hardin has reasonable cause not to simply ask for costs on the motion, but to ask for all the costs related to at a minimum, the email exchanges And rebuffed attempts at discovery. Does anyone think Russ can afford the past months billable time from Hardin? Russ has continued this because it has not cost him anything. His goal has been to bleed Null. If that suddenly reverses?

There’s something else interesting here. But let’s wait until next week to talk about it.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Greer has an obvious out and in the theory of “fuck the Jannie’s they’re probably trannies” I’m going to post it no matter what /dev/null may think.

Greer can simply point out that the court is weak, powerless against the Putin-backed superhacker site known as Kiwifarms. It’s been extensively documented on BlueSky by Jackie Signh, cybercrime czar emeritus of the well-respected Biden admin.

And Biden outranks any wimpy simpy Judge.

 

[The Un-Clit]

Boy, what a day for movement in so many legal cases in the Kiwisphere!

This is one of the best. Although Hardin didn't get exactly what he wanted, he got what he NEEDED, and more from the judge who is now clearly tired of Russhole's shit:

Addressing the final Woodworker’s factor, the court finds that Mr. Greer’s recalcitrant
behavior is willful. Mr. Greer lacks excuse for nondisclosure of this information because, as the
commentary to Rule 26 states, initial disclosures are court-ordered interrogatories.

This is a significant kick in the dick from a man supposedly 'coddling' Russ. And then goes on to threaten to sanction Shitlips with penalties up to and including dismissal if he dosen't put up or shut up, AND more sanctions if he dosen't explain his shitty behavior with a VERY good reason by the 23rd.

All in all, I declare this an almost complete Hardin victory.

Russ, you wanted the chance to 'EXPLAIN' right? Looks like you're gonna get it!

 

[Debbie Macomber]

Get ready for
"The 10th circuit ruled this case has merit, therefore, I can do whatever I want forever and the case still has merit"

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

View attachment 6735420
Finally, Russ will get a chance to explain. Once the judge knows his plights he will surely win.

Your honor, it began when I got a boner for Taylor Swift...

I foresee another picture of Hitler in the next filing.

We can only hope

 

[LiquidChrisRespecter]

So he has 6 days to present whatever witnesses and evidence he has () and 13 days to explain why he shouldn't be on the hook financially for timewasting just at this particular stage of the case?

May this pattern continue until he's forced to compensate everybody for the literal years he's wasted.

Merry Christmas, dipshit.

 

[ScooterL]

That'll get right under Russell's skin. "Recalcitrant" and "willful" are going to appear in whatever cases Russell files against his next victims, next to "frivolous" and "bad faith".

 

[Bill Evans 45]

I don't know. Mr. Hardin did end up getting what he wanted out of this, i.e. showing Russ' non-compliance and an order forcing him to comply. As an added bonus the Judge is entertaining a dismissal and fee shifting for Mr. Hardin's motion to compel

If dull thuds are heard in the LV area, do not panic. It's just Russell's trauma lumps exploding. The high pitched whine that follows should be treated as an 'all clear' signal.

 

[UselessRubberKeyboard]

I foresee more plights. And attempts to argue harrassment. With a healthy dose of slander and defamation in legal filings.

This might be the end of it. (Rate me optimistic). Because Hardin has reasonable cause not to simply ask for costs on the motion, but to ask for all the costs related to at a minimum, the email exchanges And rebuffed attempts at discovery. Does anyone think Russ can afford the past months billable time from Hardin? Russ has continued this because it has not cost him anything. His goal has been to bleed Null. If that suddenly reverses?

There’s something else interesting here. But let’s wait until next week to talk about it.

“Respectfully your honor (you idiot), I can’t afford to pay anything. I’m homeless and don’t even have a pair of trousers (not that I need them in my imaginary brothel, hurr hurr). And besides, [insert ten pages (all numbered 6) of plightsperging here], and the appeals court said my case has merit, so do your duty and make Buddy Boy’s buddy boy delete everything about me forever and ever (amen).”

Just keep repeating yourself, Russ. They’ll have to give in in the end!

 

[.iota.]

the best part about this judgement is that greer can't ethan ralph his way out of it. there is no "plaintiff's honest mistake" or "plaintiff could not find any information on google" here. the rules state what is expected of him, the court told him what is expected of him, the court referred him to resources created by the judge explaining what is expected of him, and hardin repeatedly reminded him of what is expected of him. he simply refuses to comply.

i wonder if he'll demand that the magistrate judge recuse himself for his lack of justice, mercy, and understanding for even suggesting that a pro se litigant who is appearing ifp be required to pay fees for his willful recalcitrance.

 

[Magnificent Penis]

This is an amazing ruling for Null but I will wait until the 23rd with managed expectations because the court has already issued an empty threat about dismissing the case and Greer's reposting of his retarded schedule was apparently deemed good enough. If they repeat this, this time on their threat to make Greer pay for the fees accumulated due to his behavior, then Null's spergouts about being the nigger of the world and blablabla will hold way more merit because, really, what could Greer possibly say that excuses him from being DELIBERATELY rebellious and ignoring not just the basic rules of civil proceedings but also direct court orders? If they let him off the hook on this one, then it's set in stone that the court is advocating for him. Greer should pay Null for the fees Hardin incurred during this nonsense.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

the best part about this judgement is that greer can't ethan ralph his way out of it. there is no "plaintiff's honest mistake" or "plaintiff could not find any information on google" here.

I'm sure he'll still try.

 

[Bridgeburner]

So he has 6 days to present whatever witnesses and evidence he has () and 13 days to explain why he shouldn't be on the hook financially for timewasting just at this particular stage of the case?

Whatever the judge decides, those filings are going to be fun.

 

[YouTube Autist]

I'm curious whether Russell's response to this will be more of the same "I'm disabled, I'm oppressed, my dad is in the ICU, the defendants are mean Nazis, just look at this Mother Jones article" or if this out-of-the-ordinary challenge will provoke an out-of-the-ordinary response.