Opinion Men, please ask yourself why so many women would rather parent alone

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article|Archive
Women be crazy! You know it, I know it! And now they’re at their madness again.

According to a new report by the Human Fertilisation and Embryo Authority (which has such a pleasingly dystopic ring about it, no?), the number of single ladies having in vitro fertilisation (IVF) or donor insemination (DI) treatment – in other words, taking delivery of the sperm without the man attached – has tripled in the last decade.

What are they thinking, choosing to go it alone? What selfishness is rampant here, what twisted mind would rather have a baby alone than with a man – or not at all?

Feminism has gone mad, morality and possibly God is dead, and we are all going to hell in a handcart thanks to these hordes of bonkers bints queuing up to get injected with a stranger’s swimmers instead of a husband’s, or at least a partner’s, or at least a real live penis. These are, surely, the end times.

I paraphrase – but not by much – the immediate storm of outrage online and in various newspapers that has greeted the new statistic. And as ever, I have stood very quietly, listening, hoping – sometimes even pressing my ear to the ground in case I can hear the faintest, distant rumble of its approach – for the arrival of what is always missing when we begin to debate/react furiously to these issues. Namely, this question: “Oh my God – what are men doing so terribly wrong that this extraordinary situation has come about?!”

I never hear it. Just occasionally I hear the rumble, but the train of thought always seems to get diverted somewhere before it arrives at a conclusion.

So let’s try it now. Let’s try… “OMG! Being pregnant, having a baby and raising a child is such hard, all-consuming work! What could be making women feel that this extraordinary feat of labour (pardon the pun) is less burdensome executed alone than within the traditional model of parenting? I note that the number of women in same-sex couples having fertility treatment has doubled in the same period and so, men – let the self-interrogation and cultural excoriation begin!”

No? Okay, I’ll start. And I’ll start from the position, using 50 years of experience as a woman and 30 years of watching my friends navigate, and of navigating myself, the path to wanted pregnancy, that most heterosexual women would prefer to have a baby with a man they love, trust, can depend on, and who willingly and naturally shares half the domestic chores with them already, will be just as egalitarian when a baby arrives and upends the established order of things, and will be a patient, engaged, loving father thereafter, balking at none of the unpleasant new chores involved or the astonishing number of bodily fluids leaking from both his wife and the new arrival at inopportune moments.

The number of times this happens is… not great. Large numbers of candidates fall away at every stage. There are those who don’t want children ever. There are those who don’t want children yet. There are those who say they don’t want children yet but actually don’t want children ever but stick around until their partner’s peak fertile years are behind her. They often leave then, find a younger partner and have children with her. It’s a cliché, but it’s a cliché because it happens so very, very often.

What the reasoning is behind it, I do not know – and again, it’s not my business to work out. It’s something men as a class should be required to be working out and then NOT DOING ANY MORE.

There are those who want children but who are still effectively children themselves – doing chores unwillingly, incompetently (sometimes genuinely, sometimes tactically so they don’t get asked again), or not at all, always needing to be reminded (“nagged”) even if they then do them willingly. Which is to say, never the initiative, which is also to say never taking full adult responsibility for their lives.

Then there those who want children, but don’t want to stay faithful to their wife/partner – before, during and/or after the pregnancy, which is often only discovered by said wife/partner when it’s too late to make a perfectly unfettered decision about whether you want to stay under these conditions or not.

And then there is the risk that your partner will reveal himself to be violent. It is a well-documented phenomenon that pregnancy is when domestic violence either begins or, if it already present, spikes. The former may be a small risk, but it is one of the many that sits with us, always, that needs to be factored into any decision we make and especially of the life-altering kind that will also bring a new, vulnerable tiny being into the world.

I’m not saying women are perfect – of course they are not, of course we aren’t. I’m saying that we are made aware of all our imperfections, all our failings, all our sins by friends, family, acquaintances, passing strangers, sociocultural messaging and outright public condemnations by the great and good at every turn. No real or perceived female transgression is too small to be attended to, I assure you. Meanwhile, men get away – often quite literally actually! – with murder.

Until men start doing the hard, necessary work on themselves individually and as a group to make women not just feel but actually be safer, happier and better with than without them, I’m afraid more and more of them are going to go it alone – not just when it comes to having children, but more generally in life too. Men are crazy to have let it get this far.
 
We already know. It's because of this wonderful thing called "alimony"- all the money of a man, but without him complaining about you sleeping around on him.
 
What could be making women feel that this extraordinary feat of labour (pardon the pun) is less burdensome executed alone than within the traditional model of parenting?
"Murphy Brown" went on the air in 1988. I don't know if this was the first mainstream "women can do everything alone and Have It All while #girlbossing" portrayal, but the 36 years since have been a nonstop firehose of propaganda across all Media.

It is a well-documented phenomenon that pregnancy is when domestic violence either begins or, if it already present, spikes. The former may be a small risk, but it is one of the many that sits with us
Never mind that every other "domestic arrangement" has far higher rates of violence (lesbians at the top, but single motherhood a close second for both adult and child abuse). Let's attack the safest and most stable arrangement proven over millennia.
 
Because you're retarded.
You don't actually care for the well-being of your child. All you care about is yourself. How you'll look like to everyone else as a poor victim yet stunning and brave for going through with your own mistakes. Your kid will live off half a household income, wonder why you keep bringing home complete strangers, search for a missing security they'll never find where a father would have been, and come to think your dysfunctional lifestyle is a perfectly acceptable thing when all it does is create subpar, miserable people most of the time. I have yet to come across a single person who thinks a single-parent household is acceptable in any way that is well-functioning, not an idiot, or just spouting the politically correct thing to say.
 
We already know. It's because of this wonderful thing called "alimony"- all the money of a man, but without him complaining about you sleeping around on him.
I typed out a long, autistic screen about alimony and child support, but I'm going to just replace it with this: divorce screws everyone. Just think carefully before you get married. No one really wins in any alimony or child support settlement, least of all the kids.
 
Florence Nightingale was right about women
people think we're mysognists
rerpmz9dbq681.jpg
but i don't think i could say anything as blatant as this
 
Because women, in aggregate, are hypergamous, and they priced themselves out of the dating market by focusing on their careers while offering far, far less as partners (they don't care what men want in a partner, they want to tell men what they should want in a partner) while totally delusional about their worth.

Great relationships are still possible with cool women. You just have to find them, because they aren't the norm.
 
I dunno, is it because we're taught to believe a bonded-pair who divide domestic and external labor between themselves to create and sustain a viable household is an inefficient way to deliver goods and services to markets?
 
Women be crazy!

Amazing they get the correct answer in the first 3 words of the article.

"Murphy Brown" went on the air in 1988. I don't know if this was the first mainstream "women can do everything alone and Have It All while #girlbossing" portrayal, but the 36 years since have been a nonstop firehose of propaganda across all Media.

As far as I know Murphy Brown was indeed the first show to have a major protagonist who was a single working mother on a major TV network in the US.
 
Last edited:
I dunno, is it because we're taught to believe a bonded-pair who divide domestic and external labor between themselves to create and sustain a viable household is an inefficient way to deliver goods and services to markets?
cool it with the anti-semetism
 
EWU released a video this week of a chemical engineer turned sadistic gay gimp who killed and ate Kevin Bacon. He also was paranoid about the well water being poisoned.

He had multiple children. His normal wife noticed his mind deteriorating and left. Took the kids with her.

Can you imagine if she didn’t? And the kids grew up in a house with a sex & murder dungeon? If they were fed human testicles for dinner?

Anyway, whatever you say. Sometimes it is better to be a single mom.
 
Because they are subsidized by the government through our taxes. Add that many missed their opportunity and they know this is the best way to do so.
 
EWU released a video this week of a chemical engineer turned sadistic gay gimp who killed and ate Kevin Bacon. He also was paranoid about the well water being poisoned.

He had multiple children. His normal wife noticed his mind deteriorating and left. Took the kids with her.

Can you imagine if she didn’t? And the kids grew up in a house with a sex & murder dungeon? If they were fed human testicles for dinner?

Anyway, whatever you say. Sometimes it is better to be a single mom.

Kevin Bacon is still alive. This is disinformation.
 
Because you're retarded.
You don't actually care for the well-being of your child. All you care about is yourself. How you'll look like to everyone else as a poor victim yet stunning and brave for going through with your own mistakes. Your kid will live off half a household income, wonder why you keep bringing home complete strangers, search for a missing security they'll never find where a father would have been, and come to think your dysfunctional lifestyle is a perfectly acceptable thing when all it does is create subpar, miserable people most of the time. I have yet to come across a single person who thinks a single-parent household is acceptable in any way that is well-functioning, not an idiot, or just spouting the politically correct thing to say.

Correct.

The article is ignoring all of the other window frames in the room to look out a tiny porthole. The frame through which we consider the welfare of the child, the frame through which we see motivations deeper than "Men suck."

I for one am interested in the economic frame because it seems patently obvious to me that women are putting off relationships and procreation during their sexual prime to pursue careers and vanity degrees, then literally loosing their shit at ~30 when the 'egg timer' starts going off. At which point they face the harsh realization that men want a pair of perky young tits and a kind soul to raise their kids, don't give a fuck about MBAs and are repulsed by your controlling 'girl boss energy.' Men are not women, women are not men, men work long hours, women raise kids. Stop trying to have your cake and eat it too and then maybe you won't be a miserable cunt who nobody wants to make babies with.

Ps. I have witnessed this shit, I watched the (shitty, incompetent, miserable, narcissistic, single, dyke) urban girlboss run away to inseminate herself at like 38. I wish that poor child the best luck, they are going to fucking need it.
Pps. Never work under a woman directly, if you find yourself in such a predicament due to a restructuring put it in neutral and coast until you reach a convenient exit point.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom