Opinion IS “OBLIGATION SEX” BIBLICAL?

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

IS “OBLIGATION SEX” BIBLICAL?​

2B2513E0-927A-47EB-988A-85174F7A0400.jpeg
Women have tried to convince me that “obligation sex” is unbiblical. Posts and articles have been written arguing that it is definitely not biblical. Well, let’s ponder this for a bit.

What is the definition of obligation? “An act or course of action to which a person is morally or legally bound; a duty or commitment.” So, naysayers are telling me that wives don’t have a “duty or commitment” to be sexually available for their husbands?

What does God have to say about this? “Let the husband render unto the wife due benevolence: and likewise also the wife unto the husband. The wife hath not power of her own body, but the husband: and likewise also the husband hath not power of his own body, but the wife. Defraud ye not one the other, except it be with consent for a time, that ye may give yourselves to fasting and prayer; and come together again, that Satan tempt you not for your incontinency.” (1 Corinthians 7:3-5)

Since I only teach women and we are each only responsible for our own obedience to God and not that of our husbands, I will only teach you what God commands of you, women. He commands you to render due benevolence to your husband. What does this mean? This is from Gill’s Commentary: “And, likewise also the wife unto the husband; she is not to refuse the use of the bed when required, unless there is some just impediment, otherwise she comes under the name of a ‘rebellious wife’; concerning whom, and her punishment, the Jews give the following rules…” (You can read her punishment HERE.)

We are also told that our husbands have power over our body and commands us not to defraud them. Defraud means “To withhold wrongfully from another what is due to him.” Are we allowed to defraud our husbands sexually if we don’t feel like it or not in the mood as most claim? No. The only reasons for not having sexual intimacy are with consent between husband and wife for fasting and prayer. Then, we are warned that if we do defraud our husbands, we may be tempting them for their lack of self-control.

So, is obligation sex biblical? Yes, it absolutely is biblical! How do we have sexual intimacy if we’re not in the mood? Change your mood! Decide to love your husband and obey God. Stop allowing your moods and emotions to control you and begin living in obedience to God. How? By taking every thought captive to the obedience of Christ and replacing the lies you are believing with Truth. There are many blessings from doing this including having a loving and close relationship with your husband. Marriage is for sexual intimacy and is part of loving our husbands as God commands in Titus 2:4! It’s God’s perfect design for us. Please, don’t neglect your husband by defrauding him of sexual intimacy and tear your home down with your own hands. Stop being a rebellious wife.

P.S. By the way, “obligation” isn’t a dirty word as feminists have made it out to be. We’re obligated to love and obey God. We’re obligated to love and care for our children. We’re obligated to love, serve, and be sexually available to our husbands. These are all good things!

Let her be as the loving hind and pleasant roe; let her breasts satisfy thee at all times; and be thou ravished always with her love.
Proverbs 5:19
 
It's that kind of stuff that puts me off the whole Jesus thing. I don't know how you can love a woman when you think of her as a vessel for your own earthly pleasure.
 
Why wouldn't you want to sexually satisfy your spouse?
Because there's more to the union between two people than the base animal desire for sex. I like to think so anyway.
Besides, if something like this was said about a man
How do we have sexual intimacy if we’re not in the mood? Change your mood!
it would be characterized as abusive.
 
It's that kind of stuff that puts me off the whole Jesus thing. I don't know how you can love a woman when you think of her as a vessel for your own earthly pleasure.
In Catholicism we identify four key elements of legitimate marriage, which can therefore be extrapolated to sex.

Those are Free, Total, Faithful, and Fruitful. Relevant to this discussion is the first element, free. Sex between a husband and wife (the only way it should happen) must be freely given on both sides. Therefore the concept of the man demanding sex and the woman having no choice other than to give it is a false concept that does not align with legitimate Christian Faith.

Additionally there's a misconception that procreation is the only purpose for sex. This is not true. Sex is a quintessential part of the sacrament of marriage. In fact by some measures the marriage is not fully legitimized until it is consummated through sex, and it's also important for marital bonding and pleasure. The misconception arises because sex is supposed to be "open to procreation" which means contraception is wrong, as is the man intentionally finishing anywhere other than inside his wife's vagina.
 
Those are Free, Total, Faithful, and Fruitful. Relevant to this discussion is the first element, free. Sex between a husband and wife (the only way it should happen) must be freely given on both sides. Therefore the concept of the man demanding sex and the woman having no choice other than to give it is a false concept that does not align with legitimate Christian Faith.
I should fucking hope not. It warms my heart to know the individual behind this article is full of shit.

Man, American puritanism sounds more and more retarded every day.
 
I can unfortunately say from experience that the fastest way to kill your sex life and your relationship is to have sex when you’re not really feeling it.

It wasn’t even that I was pressured or badgered or anything. Maybe I just read too many “female desire is responsive” thunkpieces. But sex when I wasn’t into it was uncomfortable, I began to associate sex with that partner with discomfort, and the rest is history (and dry as the Sahara).

Don’t do it! Get in the mood or don’t have sex.
 
Because there's more to the union between two people than the base animal desire for sex. I like to think so anyway.
Besides, if something like this was said about a man

it would be characterized as abusive.
Nothing about wanting to satisfy your spouse implies it's the sole purpose of the union, what other aspects of the union between husband and wife do you consider optional?
 
It's that kind of stuff that puts me off the whole Jesus thing. I don't know how you can love a woman when you think of her as a vessel for your own earthly pleasure.
Im not familiar with the passage in the Bible where Jesus directs this or even discusses something remotely close to "obligation sex".
 
I don't know why people keep focusing exclusively on the female half of this command when if you read the Bible itself it is clear that this is a duty each person owes the other as part of their marriage. It also explains the reasoning that routinely denying your spouse leads to marital dysfunction and adultery, which I also don't think any reasonable person can argue with.

In short if you are a man or woman and you find yourself constantly denying your spouse then according to the Bible you are committing a sin and damaging your marriage. If such a basic and obvious conclusion is enough to "turn you away from Jesus", then I doubt you were ever close to finding Him in the first place.
 
I don't know why people keep focusing exclusively on the female half of this command when if you read the Bible itself it is clear that this is a duty each person owes the other as part of their marriage. It also explains the reasoning that routinely denying your spouse leads to marital dysfunction and adultery, which I also don't think any reasonable person can argue with.

In short if you are a man or woman and you find yourself constantly denying your spouse then according to the Bible you are committing a sin and damaging your marriage. If such a basic and obvious conclusion is enough to "turn you away from Jesus", then I doubt you were ever close to finding Him in the first place.
You can always respond directly, you know.
 
Because there's more to the union between two people than the base animal desire for sex. I like to think so anyway.
There's certainly more to it than that, but that doesn't mean the base animal desire isn't there or isn't important.

Perfect coordination of mood isn't going to just happen very often without a little work from at least one side, and just waiting for it to happen is going to lead to inaction and buildup of resentment.
 
There's certainly more to it than that, but that doesn't mean the base animal desire isn't there or isn't important.

Perfect coordination of mood isn't going to just happen very often without a little work from at least one side, and just waiting for it to happen is going to lead to inaction and buildup of resentment.
People who aren't autistic don't need this explained to them that 'common sense' is a thing that exists and is in fact real.

People in a marriage that is healthy typically aren't two autists needing a third party for sex arbitrage.
 
The misconception arises because sex is supposed to be "open to procreation" which means contraception is wrong, as is the man intentionally finishing anywhere other than inside his wife's vagina.
This is a major reason why otherwise faithful people turn away from this kind of Christianity. Husbands and wives need intimacy, sexual intimacy, even when adding another infant to the family would be devastating to their mental and physical health. Anyone who has children and isn’t cruel and delusional understands this.
 
This is a major reason why otherwise faithful people turn away from this kind of Christianity. Husbands and wives need intimacy, sexual intimacy, even when adding another infant to the family would be devastating to their mental and physical health. Anyone who has children and isn’t cruel and delusional understands this.
There are natural ways to avoid pregnancy like keeping track of the woman's menstrual cycle and avoiding sex when she's ovulating.
 
If you hate your husband so much that you have to read a blog post to convince yourself to have sex with him, I don't think the Bible is the problem here.
 
Back
Top Bottom