- Joined
- Sep 30, 2023
Welp, I am now in more debt than @hackingbutlegal, but they couldn't cuff me 1/
💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter
- Thread starter Caverlock
- Start date
-
🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
-
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
Create account
- Joined
- Apr 15, 2021
That's a good point. Imagine threatening to kill your own kid. What a piece of shit
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2023
She wasn't even born yet. Classy guy.
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
I still think it might be premature. A denial of a qualified immunity motion is immediately appealable, as it's the definitive example of a collateral order under the doctrine outlined in Mitchell v. Forsyth. The grant of a stay on further trial proceedings pending the appellate decision is almost guaranteed, so we might not see any actual action in the trial court for a while.
Personally, I think the decision is in error and on top of that it looks like a pile of dog shit and I'm wondering what went through the head of the judge who signed off on it, but whatever.
Let's wait until there isn't an appeal.
It's not really up to me, though, I just don't want to do it myself.
Hey he's a class act. He said he'd wait for her to be born before murdering her along with her mother. What a major dude!
This is pretty de rigeur as an immunity argument can be raised any time it rears its ugly head. For instance, it could be raised again at the summary judgment stage or even conceivably during trial or after trial in the form of renewing it in a motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict even if a jury finds against the defendant.
Last edited:
lolwatagain
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 19, 2017
Since most courts seem to apply qualified immunity unless there is another case with the exact same facts showing that the police's actions were clearly unreasonable, I get the feeling the case will end once it reaches that point. I'm not sure that Richardson is the kind of case that clearly establishes a right so as to overcome qualified immunity.
- Joined
- Feb 6, 2023
Dear God, please let him go pro se, it would be so, so funny.
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2019
He talks super proabortion but he acts so prolife! That’s our Ricky.
- Joined
- Jan 24, 2020
Considering the track record of litigation being tracked by this very website, I can only conclude that such decisions are in fact par for the course, and examples to the contrary are simply exceptional.
- Joined
- Sep 30, 2023
Whatever way the wind blows to get more Twitter likes. That's our Ricky.
Going back and reading this thread from the beginning a few days before this drops is just amazing, a real eye-opener. He hasn't changed a bit.
Time is indeed a flat circle and the chickens are coming home to roost.
The cops and city are going to bleed him dry, just to get him to shut the fuck up. Will it work? Let's watch!
- Joined
- Dec 28, 2014
Okay. Stadtmueller. He's 82 years old. He's a Reagan appointee who ascended to the status of the Chief Judge for the Eastern District of Wisconsin in 1995 (and retired and took emeritus status in 2002).
I find this opinion bizarre and somewhat disorganized but he doesn't seem to be some kind of unhinged giddy leftist. That said, I've seen better cases than this thrown out on QI grounds by even leftist judges. So I don't know what to say.
While I thought QI should have been (emphasis on "should have") a kill shot, I did consider that Fatty's lawyers had at least made sufficient factual claims that given the lenient pleading standards for dismissing for failure to state a claim, he might have said enough bullshit (that we know to be a pack of lies) at least to survive that.
And also, that if this goes forward, this is the funniest possible option. Because as we know, there are extrinsic reasons the police might respond to calls involving Fatty in particular involving his dire state of mental health and his history of actually making dramatic threats of violence, rape, and murder against women and children, including his own as-yet unborn child and estranged wife.
That's a very important context for why calls involving Fatty can't just be dismissed even if he has been the victim of swattings.
I certainly hope they get to the bottom of who did or paid for those swattings. Because that could get REALLY fun.
I still do not feel this ruling is in conformity with current QI jurisprudence and wonder if the defendants will file an immediate appeal, to which they are automatically entitled under the collateral order doctrine.
I find this opinion bizarre and somewhat disorganized but he doesn't seem to be some kind of unhinged giddy leftist. That said, I've seen better cases than this thrown out on QI grounds by even leftist judges. So I don't know what to say.
While I thought QI should have been (emphasis on "should have") a kill shot, I did consider that Fatty's lawyers had at least made sufficient factual claims that given the lenient pleading standards for dismissing for failure to state a claim, he might have said enough bullshit (that we know to be a pack of lies) at least to survive that.
And also, that if this goes forward, this is the funniest possible option. Because as we know, there are extrinsic reasons the police might respond to calls involving Fatty in particular involving his dire state of mental health and his history of actually making dramatic threats of violence, rape, and murder against women and children, including his own as-yet unborn child and estranged wife.
That's a very important context for why calls involving Fatty can't just be dismissed even if he has been the victim of swattings.
I certainly hope they get to the bottom of who did or paid for those swattings. Because that could get REALLY fun.
I still do not feel this ruling is in conformity with current QI jurisprudence and wonder if the defendants will file an immediate appeal, to which they are automatically entitled under the collateral order doctrine.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
He didn't anticipate an idiot like Patrick "Fatso" Tomlinson.
polyester
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2020
It's less funny if we won't be allowed to see the filings going forward. Considering that the motion to seal got granted. Or is that not as bad as it sounds?
- Joined
- Feb 20, 2017
You'd think we'd be able to see everything going in a court case with such a public figure like Patrick S. Tomlinson, or is the court saying that Patrick's career was so abysmal that he can't be considered one? That all the times Patrick has been viral/tried to go viral was for nothing. That his books aren't bought by anyone and that he's not famous enough to have a cult going after him?
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2022
JPS just 100% officially cucked us, the Public Who Pays His God Damn Salary(tm), out of all the juicy bits hidden in that document #28.
Evan Goyke, greenhorn City Attorney: stand your ground, child. Do not offer this pig-man a settlement. Patrick S Tomlinson has demanded his day in court, mostly just so he can get up and perform his theatrics before a jury. Who are you to deny us, I mean deny him, that?
Evan Goyke, greenhorn City Attorney: stand your ground, child. Do not offer this pig-man a settlement. Patrick S Tomlinson has demanded his day in court, mostly just so he can get up and perform his theatrics before a jury. Who are you to deny us, I mean deny him, that?
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2024
Civilians are getting into it with Pat again. A pepperoni ingredient is slapping him around like he's Tommy Tomlinson's tonsils.
General Fatton is back, too. Put your listening ears on, Putin.
General Fatton is back, too. Put your listening ears on, Putin.
- Joined
- Jan 3, 2017
Russia is pretty well known for gimping any equipment they sell to foreign countries. Can't have your allies not needing your protection anymore.
They also refer to the downgraded models they provide to other countries as "monkey models".
They also refer to the downgraded models they provide to other countries as "monkey models".
AutoClownMaker
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2020
For Milwaukee's DNS "rat harborage" is like cops "resisting arrest".
One of the only ways The Fatprick can ever get the victory he wants is to just keep engaging and hoping someone gets MATFFWBT enough to break the law. The 'pretending to be family' could be a crime but the DA is gonna need more than 'parody family' as the crime.
The badger named accounts got the now deleted dollycule to go after a badger account that had nothing to do with The Fatprick, But the winner of the Patrick themed accounts is the toilet.
A Trump level of not giving a damn. When Leslie puts a Trump hashtag on The Fatprick she's not wrong.
Not many people discuss how much the feds cost but in state civil - 50-100K or more is known because people share that.
The feds? 250K+ to take to trial end has been mentioned.
Appeal? Now having the cops be bound to the idea if swat calls are repetitive then there is a duty would be a societal good. But even hear The Fatprick failed. Saying 'Patrick could do good' like that was better for Halloween as that's some damn blood chilling event. To do that good? 1 million or more.
I was gonna point out his age. But you got there.
And his voice varies when he talks. It slips into that old man sounding voice more often these days. Would have liked to seen him when he was doing the FBI's dirty work.
That could bankrupt him if the court system can make the self-swat claim stick. The city AND the cops attorney fees AND his own? I wonder at what point Niki can do the divorce thing to avoid getting stuck with such a ruling given WI as a marital property state?
Bonus if the bankruptcy court then doesn't let him out of that debt.
Proper framing matters. Just claim it is being hidden due to The Fatprick being hunted by the federal judge per is MKE filing. They are obviously hiding the paperwork to protect that judge from the power of Internet autism sleuths.
Rather shocked no pest has taken up 'conspiracy Pat's friend' as a posting framework. Why do they deny us that joy?