US Copyright Office “Frees The McFlurry,” Allowing Repair Of Ice Cream Machines - Soft-serve machines get a not-quite-parfait exemption to DMCA circumvention rule.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Article -- Archive

US Copyright Office “frees the McFlurry,” allowing repair of ice cream machines​

Soft-serve machines get a not-quite-parfait exemption to DMCA circumvention rule.​

Jon Brodkin – Oct 25, 2024 3:37 PM

Consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge today hailed a decision by the US Copyright Office to "grant an exemption specifically allowing for repair of retail-level food preparation equipment—including soft serve ice cream machines similar to those available at McDonald's."

The group, which teamed with iFixit to request the exemption last year, said the government ruling will "free the McFlurry." Public Knowledge Senior Policy Counsel Meredith Rose called the decision a victory for "franchise owners, independent repair shops, and anyone who's had to bribe their kids with a chilly treat on lengthy road trips."

The change should "spark a flurry of third-party repair activity and enable businesses to better serve their customers," Rose said. "While we are disappointed that the Register recommended a narrower exemption than we had proposed, this does not soften our enthusiasm. We will continue to chip away at half-baked laws blocking the right to repair, sprinkling consumer victories as we go. Today's win may not be parfait, but it's still pretty sweet."

The final rule adopted by Librarian of Congress Carla Hayden was based on recommendations made by Shira Perlmutter, the register of copyrights and director of the US Copyright Office. The ruling came in the ninth triennial proceeding to determine exemptions under Section 1201 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. The process provides exemptions for the next three years to "the prohibition against circumvention of technological measures that effectively control access to copyrighted works."

Exemption covers retail-level equipment​


As Public Knowledge notes, "Section 1201 of the DMCA makes it illegal to bypass a digital lock that protects a copyrighted work, such as a device's software, even when there is no copyright infringement." Public Knowledge and iFixit jointly petitioned for a repair exemption covering diagnosis, maintenance, and repair of commercial and industrial equipment.

Manufacturers opposed the exemption, but it received support from the Department of Justice Antitrust Division, the Federal Trade Commission, and the National Telecommunications and Information Administration.

"The Register recommends adopting a new exemption covering diagnosis, maintenance, and repair of retail-level commercial food preparation equipment because proponents sufficiently showed, by a preponderance of the evidence, adverse effects on the proposed noninfringing uses of such equipment," the Register's findings said.

The exemption does not include commercial and industrial food preparation devices. Unlike the retail-level equipment, the software-enabled industrial machines "may be very different in multiple aspects and proponents have not established a record of adverse effects with respect to industrial equipment," the Register wrote.

Error codes unintuitive and often change​


While ice cream machines aren't the only devices affected, the Register's recommendations note that "proponents primarily relied on an example of a frequently broken soft-serve ice cream machine used in a restaurant to illustrate the adverse effects on repair activities."

Proponents said that fixing the Taylor Company ice cream machines used at McDonald's required users to interpret "unintuitive" error codes. Some error codes are listed in the user manual, but these manuals were said to be "often outdated and incomplete" because error codes could change with each firmware update.

Difficulties in repair related to "technological protection measures," or TPMs, were described as follows:

Moreover, other error codes can only be accessed by reading a service manual that is made available only to authorized technicians or through a "TPM-locked on-device service menu." This service menu can only be accessed by using a manufacturer-approved diagnostic tool or through an "extended, undocumented combination of key presses." However, "it is unclear whether the 16-press key sequence... still works, or has been changed in subsequent firmware updates." Proponents accordingly asserted that many users are unable to diagnose and repair the machine without circumventing the machine's TPM to access the service menu software, resulting in significant financial harm from lost revenue.

The Register said it's clear that "diagnosis of the soft-serve machine's error codes for purposes of repair can often only be done by accessing software on the machine that is protected by TPMs (which require a passcode or proprietary diagnostic tool to unlock)," and that "the threat of litigation from circumventing them inhibits users from engaging in repair-related activities."

McDonald’s, Kytch work on settlement​


The Register found that repair of other food preparation equipment is similarly inhibited. "As with soft-serve machines, users of software-enabled ovens and refrigerators used in retail or restaurant settings are being inhibited from performing certain repairs by TPMs that block access to error codes. Accordingly, the Register finds that users of retail-level commercial food preparation equipment may be adversely affected by the prohibition against circumvention," the recommendation said.

The Register noted a lawsuit against McDonald's filed by Kytch, which sold a product to McDonald's restaurant owners to help them keep the ice cream machines running. Kytch sued McDonald's in 2022, alleging that the fast food chain and Taylor "joined forces to drive Kytch out of the marketplace." Kytch and McDonald's now say they are working on a settlement.

The Association of Home Appliance Manufacturers argued at a hearing that repair activities do not require the circumvention of TPMs because almost all of those repairs are mechanical in nature. More opposition came from the Entertainment Software Association, Motion Picture Association, and Recording Industry Association of America, which were collectively referred to in the Register's recommendations as Joint Creators I.

"During the hearing, Joint Creators I testified that 'it seems like the proponents' complaint about the Taylor [soft-serve] machines is that they display cryptic error codes and break a lot. But neither of those is a circumvention issue,'" the Register wrote. "Joint Creators I further noted that to the extent that proponents seek an exemption for a specific third-party circumvention device, trafficking in that device would be prohibited by the anti-trafficking provisions of section 1201."
 
I'm torn on this. I work on equipment similar to ice cream machines every once in a while (Ice machines, soda dispensers) and trust me, there is in some ways a good reason for a machine to stop working until maintenance is done. You do not want to see the insides of your local jeet run gas stations ice machine. The real solution would be to keep requirements for maintenance but make sure it's available to all mechanical contractors.
This is very true, i found mold on one of the coffee machine dispensers at my local jeetstation
Land of the free.
home of the cream
 
Pretty sure the “ice cream machine is broken” takes are because the store staff or managers do not want to reclean the machines. They aren’t actually broken lmao.
 
I think the same machines are used by plenty other places and don't get messed up as often as at McDonalds. So it may in part be due to poor maintenance. You're basically counting on McDonalds staff to be fine cleaning the things and doing it correctly, also during that time they supposedly will say the machine is broken when it's really just them taking their time with it.

So it's been a combo of the repair company having a monopoly of sorts and employees likely fucking things up at times.
I dont think the employees are to blame, as the employees at an Arby's are going to be as much of a gorilla to the equipment as the employees at McDonalds. I think McDonalds probably forces the franchisees to pay for the exorbant maintenance of the machines (other franchises might subsidize at least a portion of it), and that has them make landlord-like decisions on if they will fix the machine that year.
 
Last edited:
So wait, the reason Ice Cream machines are so often busted is because of what is essentially DRM?
A major plot point in one of my favor games, Starsector, is that corporate DRM makes it nearly impossible for people to recreate and maintain advanced technology like modern starships and efficient antimatter production

Life is truly stranger than fiction in the stupidest ways
 
I'm kinda torn about this
yes, the ice cream machine bullshit was a giant pile of bullshit, but I'm a little squeamish about the feds going "well, there's a bunch of fat people annoyed at this, so... basically fuck your property rights"
The property right of being beholden to the gayest fucking companies imaginable to use and fix your own equipment? Enforcing right to repair is easily the best use of the fed’s time.
 
How dare you repair our ice cream machines without our consent. You think just because you bought them that means you can do whatever you want with them? Fools. Now suffer our legalistic wrath.
*sues you*
yeah I totally get how this is a lot of bullshit upon bullshit, and if there was a way to exclusively limit this power to bullshit DRM crap that would be cool, but
 
Pretty sure the “ice cream machine is broken” takes are because the store staff or managers do not want to reclean the machines. They aren’t actually broken lmao.
It's unironically because of a weird policy where they had to call someone to hit a button.

That's why they needed the US Copyright Office to do this, info is in the article of this thread or the above video.
 
RIP to this wonderful meme
1000008015.jpg
 
yeah I totally get how this is a lot of bullshit upon bullshit, and if there was a way to exclusively limit this power to bullshit DRM crap that would be cool, but
What's your worst case slippery slope nightmare, here? I'm genuinely curious. I can't see this as anything but excellent news, but I also have farmers in my family that have pressganged me into hating John Deere even though I've never touched a tractor.
 
What's your worst case slippery slope nightmare, here? I'm genuinely curious. I can't see this as anything but excellent news, but I also have farmers in my family that have pressganged me into hating John Deere even though I've never touched a tractor.

John Deere is another great example of DRM gone insane.
 
What's your worst case slippery slope nightmare, here? I'm genuinely curious. I can't see this as anything but excellent news, but I also have farmers in my family that have pressganged me into hating John Deere even though I've never touched a tractor.
tbh I hadn't noticed I hit post, and had wandered off from the idea

but yeah I'm just kinda ehh on it, like when I've encountered crooked cops looking the other way about shit because they're a friend of a buddy I'm with or something
I'm glad for the result, but I'm not really enthused about the whole thing
 
That and cleaning. It takes a while to clean and then filter out the sanitizing solutions.
I honestly think this was kinda a scape goat. Like do you really think the machines would be out for weeks because somehow they couldn't fucking wipe something down, like they do with everything else?
I think this was an excuse spread to try and prevent humiliation at how badly the situation was fucked.
 
I honestly think this was kinda a scape goat. Like do you really think the machines would be out for weeks because somehow they couldn't fucking wipe something down, like they do with everything else?
I think this was an excuse spread to try and prevent humiliation at how badly the situation was fucked.
Highly likely it is just an excuse. It should be noted though that cleaning the machine involved taking pieces of it apart and running sanitizer through it, so if the McWage-slave doesn't do their job right, you now have customers with bleach flavored vanilla ice cream. If any of those parts gets fucked up and broken your ass was gone. Nobody wanted to get stuck cleaning it due to how much the managers would micromanage and breathe down your neck when you had to clean it.

Now that I think about it, given everything I saw when I worked there I'm damn surprised that thing was even on at all.
 
Last edited:
why should the exemption only apply to retail level products? what logical reason is there to make that disctinction
 
Back
Top Bottom