💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 156 22.4%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.3%
  • Total voters
    696
Third World Aristocrat said:
Larry Forman (The DUI Guy) explains on Twitter why he rescinded his offer to assist Rekieta.

6536182-5300459c01173fd39a03118b15ef9ac3.png
Link | Nitter | Nitter Archive
Click to expand...
It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:
  • Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
  • Nick neglecting his 5 children
  • Nick doing drugs/tweaking in church
  • Nick's comments about the judge and her "pussy"
  • Nick accusing state advocates for his neglected children of perjury
  • Nick lying to officers about April "visiting"
  • Nick befriending Melton, a (not yet convicted) pedophile
  • Nick ridiculing the state for making him "go to rehab"
  • Nick mocking his drug charges by drinking "coke"
  • Nick accusing small town police officers of planting hard drugs in his house
  • Nick failing court mandated alcohol tests
  • Nick using biblical references to normalize having both a wife and live-in girlfriend
  • Nick yelling at officers during multiple traffic violations
It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.
 
Martin Cooter King Jr said:
It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:
  • Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
  • Nick neglecting his 5 children
  • Nick doing drugs/tweaking in church
  • Nick's comments about the judge and her "pussy"
  • Nick accusing state advocates for his neglected children of perjury
  • Nick lying to officers about April "visiting"
  • Nick befriending Melton, a (not yet convicted) pedophile
  • Nick ridiculing the state for making him "go to rehab"
  • Nick mocking his drug charges by drinking "coke"
  • Nick accusing small town police officers of planting hard drugs in his house
  • Nick failing court mandated alcohol tests
  • Nick using biblical references to normalize having both a wife and live-in girlfriend
  • Nick yelling at officers during multiple traffic violations
It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.
Click to expand...
Dude, he's a lawyer. They'd defend people for anything people did if they think they can win. Morals are never in the equation. That's how they got the rep for being scum in the first place. :story:
 
Martin Cooter King Jr said:
It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:
  • Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
Click to expand...
Yeah, I always suspected it was that that did him in with Larry. Given that Larry walked back his offer right after that revelation.

However, TBH, it could also be that Larry freaked out when Nick shower called Null and confirmed those CHIPs documents were authentic.

That was a real smooth move BTW, Nick. We'd still be debating whether @MNPublicRecords was bullshitting us if you hadn't have done that.

Good job. Dumbass.
 
Pippa's Greasy KB said:
For who? The state wouldnt give a shit, would they? Each person still gets paid regardless of how fast they go AND they get accolades to use for promotion when they take heads (like nick's) no?
Click to expand...
For the state it’s probably more a matter of the time investment that’s required for a trial - there are many many cases and only so many judges, prosecutors, and court staff to go around. If they can lighten the overall caseload via people pleading out, it’s a win for everyone.

Nick’s case really isn’t anything remarkable, either. I know it is to us, but as has been said in this thread many times before, it’s a pretty standard possession case - there’s not really much of a fact question to even put before a jury. Niggers get busted for drugs and get their kids taken all the time and nobody bats an eye. Nobody’s getting a promotion because they put Nick Rekieta on probation and made him do community service (the most likely outcome.)
 
N1bbaN3rd said:
You have to keep in mind that the people who are still in Nick's Locals (who aren't a-logging) are in denial. As far as they're concerned, the positive coke test is just a misunderstanding, because there's no way their e-daddy is that much of a fuck up and a degenerate (despite all the evidence staring them in the face). It's just another one of the countless examples of the Sunk Cost Fallacy in action.
Click to expand...
"Resolved" doesn't mean a particular outcome, Nick just knows that people will assume there's been a favourable outcome when he uses that word.

Locals has always been the home of Nick's most degenerate fans. Anyone who didn't bail early has known for a long time that Nick is a degenerate and sees nothing wrong with it.
 
Captain Manning said:
Nick shower called Null and confirmed those CHIPs documents were authentic.

That was a real smooth move BTW, Nick. We'd still be debating whether @MNPublicRecords was bullshitting us if you hadn't have done that.
Click to expand...
That remains one of the most astonishing fuckups I’ve seen a person make. Nick is the ultimate cautionary tale for every human being. Just so fucking stupid and lacking humility.
 
Dimension Sniper said:
For the state it’s probably more a matter of the time investment that’s required for a trial - there are many many cases and only so many judges, prosecutors, and court staff to go around. If they can lighten the overall caseload via people pleading out, it’s a win for everyone.

Nick’s case really isn’t anything remarkable, either. I know it is to us, but as has been said in this thread many times before, it’s a pretty standard possession case - there’s not really much of a fact question to even put before a jury. Niggers get busted for drugs and get their kids taken all the time and nobody bats an eye. Nobody’s getting a promotion because they put Nick Rekieta on probation and made him do community service (the most likely outcome.)
Click to expand...
Yeah ok but it's just time they spend waiting for nick to dig himself deeper. They can do something else in the meanwhile. Wouldn't be surprised if the prosecution relishes it at this point considering how much nick has attacked them. I imagine it would make a good water cooler talk for them.

"Youre not gonna believe what my guy just did!"
"What?"
"He filed a franks motion on a reupload of his stream! The exact same copy!"
 
Dimension Sniper said:
Niggers get busted for drugs and get their kids taken all the time and nobody bats an eye.
Click to expand...
Most also get sentenced to some amount of prison time, many never get their kids back. Nick getting the white glove treatment should make him grateful but his behaviour gives pause to think he might want to do some time.

CURVEBALL: He secretly enjoyed jail. He could live out being prison gay, cause it's not full gay.

Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
Being a substance abuser will not likely hurt him...especially if he does the treatment thing. See link above of one person's analysis of reinstatement. If they are somewhat charitable about an actual disbarred lawyer, they'll have it for people who aren't yet. And MN is the land of rehab.
Click to expand...
Could this be why Nick went to "court mandated rehab?"
 
Martin Cooter King Jr said:
It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.
Click to expand...
What was he lying about? Nick isn't just a shitty person, lawyers deal with that all the time. He's a shitty CLIENT. He's the kind of jerkoff who would ignore your advice and do dumb shit that could get you in trouble for just defending him, because he doesn't even understand what he's doing.

He could make you look like a moron just for defending him, and not in a way that would get you more clients.
Friend of Dorothy Parker said:
MN, on the other hand, is very flex-y about it, especially if the action did not actually revolve around harming or taking advantage of clients. And in MN, even if disbarred, lawyers have a potentially friendly return.
Click to expand...
This is why I really didn't focus on the "moral turpitude" aspect, partly since it's a phrase only legal autists even recognize, much less understand. It's actually one of my areas of specialty, along with ethics in general. Also fun fact: philosophical and legal books on ethics are the most frequently stolen from libraries.

You think I'm making this up:

Not just that, but the more advanced and esoteric the works are, the more likely they are to be stolen.
 
Balldo's Gate said:
A tweet from a guy who is very regretful about his time on drugs:
Click to expand...
He should have done more what? More cocaine? More bad things? More. . .something so incredibly bad we have a separate thread for speculating about it? I'm not understanding what he's getting at here.
 
Martin Cooter King Jr said:
It was only because Nick kept making videos on YouTube? Not:
  • Nick's 8 yo daughter testing positive for cocaine
  • Nick neglecting his 5 children
  • Nick doing drugs/tweaking in church
  • Nick's comments about the judge and her "pussy"
  • Nick accusing state advocates for his neglected children of perjury
  • Nick lying to officers about April "visiting"
  • Nick befriending Melton, a (not yet convicted) pedophile
  • Nick ridiculing the state for making him "go to rehab"
  • Nick mocking his drug charges by drinking "coke"
  • Nick accusing small town police officers of planting hard drugs in his house
  • Nick failing court mandated alcohol tests
  • Nick using biblical references to normalize having both a wife and live-in girlfriend
  • Nick yelling at officers during multiple traffic violations
It was only because Nick kept making YouTube videos? Lawyers really are good at lying.
He's not a very reliable client, he's also an addict.
Click to expand...
Larry is a careered criminal defense attorney. He's probably seen worst. But yeah Nick's actions are reprehensible but they also make him a shitty client to defend because every time he opened his mouth he hurt his case and if I was a attorney I too would have been like nah fuck this guy.
 
crazy how we don't hear about the monty case anymore, what happened with that?

Also Nick straight up doesn't have a streaming career now, so what will he do for money? even if his parents are fine letting him leech off them, he has to do something.
 
Balldo's Gate said:
More Rekieta comments on Melton's behavior towards Aaron's kids:

View attachment 6547045
(Archive)
Click to expand...
What kind of asinine unhinged faggot response was that? What attention, the kind that involves calling a literal 10-year-old a loose whore that should do OnlyFans at 15? The kind that says he'd like chasing defensive little boys in coal mines to presumably rape? How many of Aaron's kids were taken away? I don't know the kind of attention they get from him but it's probably better than yours.

Balldo's Gate said:
Rekieta implies that @Potentially Criminal and other LawTubers knew that he "was a crackhead" when he was still popular:
Click to expand...
Did they know he allowed his 8-year-old child to test positive for cocaine metabolites at >5000pg/mg with a cutoff at just 500, ie ten times higher?
I think the outcome would be different.
 
AltisticRight said:
What kind of asinine unhinged faggot response was that? What attention, the kind that involves calling a literal 10-year-old a loose whore that should do OnlyFans at 15? The kind that says he'd like chasing defensive little boys in coal mines to presumably rape?
Click to expand...
Yes.

Nick finds the paricular "attention" Melton wants to give Aaron's daughter hilarious.

Because he's a piece of shit, and a sorry excuse for a father.
 
I think it's likely that Nick enjoys the company of other reprobates because it makes him feel slightly better in comparison. Doesn't hurt that losers and creeps will circle the wagon in order to allow their continued evil.
 
Skelly's view on children:
>Kiwi Farms is a den of paedophiles who want bodycam footage so they can see mah keedz
>Da goobermint is using mah keeedz to persecute me
>Pays a disgusting fat creep in excess of $100 because he does 5 hours streams on Aaron all day
>Goes on Mexico economic refugee piggy's stream even though he shared the names of all of his children. The pig who didn't even bother to read the document beforehand to make redactions like I do with those community posts
>Shares excruciating detail about Aaron's children on fat creepy Vegas piggy's dumb show
>Now he states he doesn't care about those comments which is fine, but a stark contrast to his previous "nonces face the wall" comments

What happened? Which is it? I didn't even mention how he cosied up with Vaedophile despite previous statements.
Time to catapult him into the fucking sun. It's clear that he doesn't give a shit about any child involved in this fiasco which was 100% directly due to him. Between the Qover and Aaron's side are 8 children. 8 of them. One tested positive for cocaine at ten times the cutoff and the other is being paraded around by Fatrick Meltonne as a loose whore who should do OnlyFans when she turns 15.

How grim and grimey. I hope skelly chokes to death on the next Jamaican penis he downs.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom