💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Burt Macklin]

Or even an outright deferred adjudication. Frankly if he doesn't get one of those it's because he fucked himself out of one, so if he has to suck up a conviction, even with no time, he's still lost and will have to answer to the bar association on top of that.

Sorry if I’m late on this, but if he were to get a misdemeanor/felony conviction, does his law license get immediately get revoked? I know in Texas, you can’t hold a law license with a felony, period. Not sure how Minnesota handles it, but kind of ironic he's from Texas—makes you wonder what would’ve happened if he’d stayed.

face the fucking wall nick. i hope your kids get taken away from you because you are a legitimate danger to them.

I still don’t get how Nick once argued in court about releasing bodycam footage because of 'pedo creeps on KF', then turn a blind eye to Melton's behavior and throw him money. I get 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend', but most draw the line at jokes on fucking little girls, esp. when you have little girls.

EDIT
Went to the State of MN v. Rekieta OP for some info and see if anything was filed or changed. I'm no expert, but on the 10-01-2024 Notice of Hearing for 11-26-2024 (spoiler) did it always say "Settlement Conference"? As in an ending (or plea)? I could be retard, optimistic, or both.

Spoiler: 10-01-2024 Hearing Notice

[ CASE LINK SEARCH Case Details 34-CR-24-341 ]

 

[Hellion]

I hate wine moms. But South Africans can be pretty fucking based at times.

"Rattled like an old Volkswagen Beetle."

One wonders if it particularly stung Nick that it was someone who reminds him of his mom that got a zinger off on him that was funnier than any joke he's ever - deliberately - tried to make. Bet Juju is sniggering at that one behind your back, too.

especially when you personally know and have interacted with the little girl he's sexually harassing. the only logical conclusion is nick is a sick fuck also and doesn't see anything wrong with it.

And this will only isolate Nick's children further and put them more at risk. I hope to god CPS is watching them like a hawk (X) for many years ahead.

Not only is Nick dangerous to children in and of himself, he's a poor judge of character, AND only a negligent parent would allow their children anywhere Nick or Kayla, and by proxy that will mean the Rekieta children get the short stick sometimes and left out of situations with their peers and emotionally healthy, well-adjusted adults around. Which then can enable more abuse, from their parents and any other adult that may come into their life.

Trust fund money means fuck all with emotionally neglectful (at best) parents. After all, dangerously driving a child to extracurriculars does not a parent make.

 

[Third World Aristocrat]

I got the impression he thought he would at least get the hearing.

Yes, but I think he did that through his favorite technique... THE IMPLICATION

 

[Train Operator]

I still don’t get how Nick once argued in court about releasing bodycam footage because of 'pedo creeps on KF', then turn a blind eye to Melton's behavior and throw him money. I get 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend', but most draw the line at jokes on fucking little girls, esp. when you have little girls.

especially when you personally know and have interacted with the little girl he's sexually harassing. the only logical conclusion is nick is a sick fuck also and doesn't see anything wrong with it.

 

[not william stenchever]

You got that Nick? Captain Manning grand dragon wolf wizard of the KKK says you're NOT ALLOWED to stream. DENIED.

@Captain Manning 's other car is also a Grand Dragon

Ty Beard would advise Nick to not fuck around for fear of finding out.

 

[AnOminous]

I know a lot of lawyers have substance abuse problems. Will this really suspend him?

Very often, yes. It's considered reflective of the ability to represent clients. They usually won't just for going to rehab or whatever, but if you're utterly out of control, missing court dates (even if it is your side whore), blowing off basic legal obligations, too incompetent even to deal with traffic tickets, they do quite often give an ultimatum that you need to get your shit together if you want to keep practicing.

A DWI very often gets you at least a brief suspension and ordered to rehab. They're a lot more lenient about things like possession of small amounts lately, especially minor non-felony possession of drugs like marijuana. Cocaine is a particularly bad one, because even using it indicates a propensity to fall into financial troubles that could affect clients, as well as behavioral problems associated with the drugs. Possession in near dealer quantities would certainly raise a few red flags.

It has been demonstrated that people ITT know more about Scripture than Nick.

People ITT know more about goddamn near anything than this loser.

 

[SMOCAINE 4]

Sorry if I’m late on this, but if he were to get a misdemeanor/felony conviction, does his law license get immediately get revoked? I know in Texas, you can’t hold a law license with a felony, period. Not sure how Minnesota handles it, but kind of ironic he's from Texas—makes you wonder what would’ve happened if he’d stayed.

It’s not a definite, no. Drug and Alcohol abuse is a common problem in the profession and any disciplinary committee would likely be sympathetic.

Spoiler: Caveat

Although Nick would probably fail to appear for the hearing scheduled to grill him which might piss them off enough to publicly rape him.

Here’s some examples from 2022. Crimes related to the practice of law are much more likely to lead to disbarment. Maybe he would get a 120-day suspension of his vestigial law license.

https://msbawebtest.mnbar.org/resources/publications/bench-bar/columns/2023/03/02/public-discipline-summary-for-2022

Edit: his failure to appear at April’s hearing and failure to pay his tickets/judgments will show an inability to function or represent clients in a legal landscape, though.

 

[AnOminous]

Here’s some examples from 2022. Crimes related to the practice of law are much more likely to lead to disbarment. Maybe he would get a 120-day suspension of his vestigial law license.

https://msbawebtest.mnbar.org/resources/publications/bench-bar/columns/2023/03/02/public-discipline-summary-for-2022

Brief suspensions are the most common for this kind of conviction, i.e. if he just cops to some drug offense and nothing else. If he gets deferred adjudication, he probably gets off scot-free unless they find his general conduct disturbing enough. It's pretty rare, but they can go after someone for something that isn't a crime.

All bets are off if he does something insane like go to trial and get convicted of every single count including one of endangering his own children. After all, if you can't trust a man to take care of his own children, what's he worth for living up to a fiduciary duty to clients who are otherwise strangers?

Lengthy or indefinite suspensions with conditions to reinstate the license are more common with more serious offenses. This isn't such a case, but some supposedly indefinite mere suspensions effectively operate as disbarment if the person will never be able to meet the conditions.

 

[not william stenchever]

Possession in near dealer quantities would certainly raise a few red flags.

If I had a lawyer with dealer quantities of columbian marching powder I'd expect him to at least make a profit off that shit even if a significant portion of it was going up his nose. Professionals have standards.

 

[Captain Manning]

I got the impression he thought he would at least get the hearing.

I think everybody got that impression.

That's why even if he explicitly didn't say he's getting the hearing, he implied it enough to where I feel confident in saying he thought he would get the hearing.

For example, he called everybody else a fucking moron for flat-out telling him he's not getting that hearing. Rather the shut the fuck up and see what actually happens, he had to make more sandwich jokes at Sean's expense. Pride goeth before the fall.

Also Barnes got felted massively by this too. Viva backpedaling and saying they always knew they weren't gonna get it is a cope. If there were a gorillion obvious multi-faceted Constitutional violations raised in this case, he should have gotten that hearing.

BTW, Viva and Barnes haven't said shit lately, have they? Funny and weird. Even the grifters seem to be drifting away from this dumpster fire.

 

[Hellion]

I think everybody got that impression.

That's why even if he explicitly didn't say he's getting the hearing, he implied it enough to where I feel confident in saying he thought he would get the hearing.

It's also why it was so goddamn funny watching April's malfunctioning robot / aging barmaid face at her not getting her charges thrown out, when Nick obviously told her they would, and when they were both so confident - or so stupid - to stream her from Nick's fucking basement as a taunt, when you can auto remove a background on Zoom. A picture paints a thousand words*.

*unless it's a photo from the side-ho house, then a picture paints a thousand smells

 

[Gorbus]

Is it based to be grounded by your parents at age 42? Is that part of the trad lifestyle? Or is it the libertarian lifestyle? I can't imagine being THAT emasculated, it's gotta be humiliating right? And even more humiliating is that he's so bad at being an adult that his parents are actually right to do it, because he's proven time and time again that he's an incompetent joke of a person. Without even the balls or courage in his convictions to keep doing what he wants, even though what he wants would undoubtedly be retarded and self-destructive.

 

[Stiffy]

There is no redemption arc for Nicholas Robert Rekieta. A dilligent flock of flightless birds pecked his phony mask right off! Now he's been publicly humiliated, and is exposed to the world like the thin skinned faggot he really is. He mocks the Bible, he is still unrepentant, and he hurts innocent children (his own)
I also want to point out that if Nick does have BPD, and I believe that to be the case based on observed traits in the DSM-5. Every time Aaron, Null, random lawtuber etc say something derogatory about him he gets emotionally triggered and becomes a secondary psychopath. This is why he can't stay off social media and lashes out passive aggressively like an overemotional teenage girl. Also Mike "Redbar" was right all along, Nick is 100% bisexual. There is no way in hell he didn't do gay things with Aaron sleeping in the same bed (four people) high on MDMA/Ecstasy. I can totally see a scenario where the two whores even encouraged it in the moment. Aaron is too prideful to admit it, and even if he ever does come clean he'll just blame it on the mind altering drugs. But Nick was a cheerleader, already talks like a flaming fag, and willingly slept with another man in his bed. " If it looks like a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck."
Now I'm beginning to wonder if he was ever penetrated by Dax (JuJu the Cow)?

 

[not william stenchever]

Now I'm beginning to wonder if he was ever penetrated by Dax (JuJu the Cow)?

Dax is more into getting penetrated and probably thinks the Balldo is a ridiculous invention.

 

[Finger Pistols]

Due to the seemingly rapid change in attitude, I bet his parents/mom forced him to accept a plea deal.

100% agreed.

So...if he took the plea...are we finally getting the bodycam footage?
Anyways, this is rather bizarre behaviour from Nick. Specially his seemingly tacit admitance of cocaine usage, contrasting his earlier behaviour of behemently denying ever doing such a thing and even trying to not very subtly imply that the cops planted it.

 

[Pagan Min]

What do you guys think:

1. He took a plea deal so now he thinks he's invincible

2. He has another "foolproof" legal strat like the Frank's hearing

3. He's mentally broken and doesn't even pretend to care what he says anymore

My vote would be for a variation of #1. He's agreed to take a plea, but since he thinks he's playing 48-D Water Polo, he's going to try using his TechNickality speak when having to cop to it in court. Cue his SurprisedPikachuFace once he discovers the judge isn't going to fall for his gaslighting bullshit & nixes the plea deal because of Rackets' stupidity.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Sorry if I’m late on this, but if he were to get a misdemeanor/felony conviction, does his law license get immediately get revoked? I know in Texas, you can’t hold a law license with a felony, period. Not sure how Minnesota handles it, but kind of ironic he's from Texas—makes you wonder what would’ve happened if he’d stayed.


I still don’t get how Nick once argued in court about releasing bodycam footage because of 'pedo creeps on KF', then turn a blind eye to Melton's behavior and throw him money. I get 'the enemy of my enemy is my friend', but most draw the line at jokes on fucking little girls, esp. when you have little girls.

EDIT
Went to the State of MN v. Rekieta OP for some info and see if anything was filed or changed. I'm no expert, but on the 10-01-2024 Notice of Hearing for 11-26-2024 (spoiler) did it always say "Settlement Conference"? As in an ending (or plea)? I could be retard, optimistic, or both.

Spoiler: 10-01-2024 Hearing Notice

[ CASE LINK SEARCH Case Details 34-CR-24-341 ]View attachment 6547872
View attachment 6547846

Yes, it always sold this. The court is probably giving them a chance to come to please, even if they do not end up doing so. It saves time ans money if they can get him to cooperate.

People ITT know more about goddamn near anything than this loser.

Except degeneracy.

 

[Captain Manning]

@Captain Manning 's other car is also a Grand Dragon
View attachment 6547807

Ty Beard would advise Nick to not fuck around for fear of finding out.

Ty Beard explicitly knew that the Farms was not something to go out of one's way to agro.

There's literally a clip of him, dating to 2019, from Nick show (which was never a law show, but it was then, because "Nick logic") where he was amazed at the amount of information dug up on the major players in KickVic and thanked the Farms immensely for it.

And then he took that info, and proceeded to completely fuck up Vic's case through sheer incompetence, but I digress...

Anyways, my point is Nick was uniquely positioned, to know that this wasn't a fight he wanted. Most cows simply ignore their threads. Like Aaron is doing.

There is a very short list people that go from "friend of the Farms" to bitter enemies. Offhand, it's him and Dick Masterson. There might be one or two others I can't think of ATM.

And Dick has never won Lolcow of the Year. So Nick is at least arguably dumber.

So...if he took the plea...are we finally getting the bodycam footage?

In theory. It still needs to be formalized. We're still in "it's looking like he might" phase.

My understanding is that we're still waiting till the end of November, at the earliest, for that to happen. That's when we the plea hearing is set. I don't think that's changed.

It could end up being a Christmas present to the Farms.

 

[AnOminous]

It's also why it was so goddamn funny watching April's malfunctioning robot / aging barmaid face at her not getting her charges thrown out, when Nick obviously told her they would, and when they were both so confident - or so stupid - to stream her from Nick's fucking basement as a taunt, when you can auto remove a background on Zoom. A picture paints a thousand words*.

That's what's so endlessly hilarious about Nick's neverending downfall. All these absolutely retarded self-owns when there was literally absolutely nothing to be gained from doing something so outrageously idiotic. What the fuck was going through any of their heads (other than cocaine metabolites) to make them think that was a good idea?

There is no way in hell he didn't do gay things with Aaron sleeping in the same bed (four people) high on MDMA/Ecstasy.

I'd call shirtlessly licking his ear pretty fucking gay and he openly did that on stream.

 

[thebigdream]

It's telling that the most generous reading of Nick's behaviour is that he isn't a predator per se, but that he possesses absolutely no willpower to criticise, reject or avoid easily identifiable ones.

If you'll allow me to literary-sperg for a moment, he shares many similarities with Meursault from Albert Camus' The Stranger, except that Nick has never been based enough to shoot an Arab (maybe one day he'll snag a Somalian? Raccoons don't count, they're a higher caste). Anyway, Mersault's whole thing is that he's emotionally detached to the point of absurdity, acting on base instict or when others prompt him to. To pull out just a few key moments:

• The opening scene has him attending his mother's funeral and complaining about the heat (lol) and how tired he feels rather than mourning her
• When his girlfriend proposes that they marry, he doesn't care for the idea but goes along with it because she wants to
• When he shoots the Arab, it's unclear why except that he feels like it and that he's perturbed by the heat (there goes muh heat allergy again) and the sun's glare. He literally says "It was because of the sun" lmao
• Finally, when he goes to trial for the murder, he doesn't try to defend his actions but is upset that the prosecutor dares question his character (sound like anyone?).

However the scene that has most pertinence to Nick's involvement with Melton is Mersault's interaction with Raymond, who is this slimy, violent type living in his apartment complex. After befriending Raymond, Mersault is told of his suspicions that his girlfriend has been unfaithful to him. He asks Mersault to write a letter designed to lure her back so he can abuse her. Despite knowing this, Mersault agrees to write the letter out of indifference, because he doesn't see any strong reasons to refuse. Later, when the woman is assaulted, Mersault hears this but doesn't intervene even when the police arrive to break up the fight.

Nick is absolutely this type of character. Things that are otherwise abhorrent to other people carry no emotional weight except in what they mean to him. Melton is based because he hates Aaron and Nick also hates Aaron because of his gay ex-lover abandonment issues. Any...interest Melton has in children is immaterial to him. And this is the real danger he poses to his children, he cannot see the world with any sort of objectivity and does things only when they're convenient.

Also it's hilarious that The Stranger ends in Mersault losing his court case (and going to prison, stalker child). Camus really knew the type of person he was writing about.