Culture A therapist is blowing minds by explaining how men can have sex with men and still be straight

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

A therapist is blowing minds by explaining how men can have sex with men and still be straight​

Gay sex and relationships therapist Dr. Joe Kort is causing a stir on TikTok where he explains why straight men who have sex with men can still be considered straight. If a man has sex with a man doesn't it ultimately make him gay or bisexual?

According to Kort, there can be a big chasm between our sexual and romantic orientations.

"Straight men can be attracted to the sex act, but not to the man. Straight men having sex with men doesn't cancel somebody's heterosexuality any more than a straight woman having sex with a woman cancels her [heterosexuality]," he says in the video.


Kort says he isn't erasing bisexuality, but that it's an entirely different phenomenon from straight men who have sex with men. Bisexual men are attracted to both men and women romantically, but straight men who have sex with other men, are only into the sex, not the person.

"When straight men have sex with men, it's not a gay thing. It's a guy thing," he explains in a later video.

For the man who has sex with other men and considers himself straight, it's more about getting off than getting close.

The video has had a lot of negative comments, most saying that men who have sex with men are gay or bisexual, case-closed. "Can I eat steak and still be vegan?" one commenter asks.

Many also accused Kort of being mildly homophobic for giving straight men the option to have gay sex without having to confront the notion they may be gay or bisexual.

Kort's videos point out the seldom-discussed idea that sexual and romantic attraction are not the same thing. Then, by adding the twist that someone can be into sex with a certain gender without feeling any romantic pull, makes things even more confusing.


The type of men that Kort describes could be aroused by another man sexually, but wouldn't feel comfortable or have any interest in being emotionally intimate with them. In fact, the emotional intimacy with another man may make them uncomfortable. It's just sex for sex's sake and what's wrong with that?

This same type of man may enjoy fantasizing about gay sex or watching gay pornography while having little interest in actually performing the act in real life.

Kort further explained his thoughts in a subsequent video.

"When I'm talking about straight men who sleep with men, I'm talking about a difference between who you're attracted to and what fantasies you have in your head. You have a sexual orientation and an erotic orientation," he says.

"And the things that are embedded in your erotic orientation that turn you on, that bring you to the finish line, can include other genders. You can imagine yourself being another gender," he continues.

Kort does a great job at explaining the difference between romantic and sexual attraction and that, for some, it spans gender. It may also help some men who are only into guys sexually and are unsure why they have zero romantic interest in someone, feel a little less confused.
 
Last edited:
Doctor: Its not good news.
Guy: Dont tell me, I dont want to know
Doctor: Im afraid you have the big gay
Guy: Thank god, I thought it was HIV
Doctor: Should I tell the wife?
Guy: No fuck you Im straight
Doctor: Well youre not superstraight, thats for sure
 
"When straight men have sex with men, it's not a gay thing. It's a guy thing," he explains in a later video.

Sorry, it's a gay thing. We are defined by our actions, by what we do--or in this case, who we do. A man who voluntarily has sex with other men is gay by definition. This is objective truth, fact. That shit about erotic versus romantic attraction is just so much chaff meant to confuse and distract. This therapist and others like him want people to define themselves by their feelings, which are necessarily subjective and subject to change. The whole transgender movement, for example, relies on the idea there is no objective truth, where reality is whatever subjective, feelings-based perspective you desire to bestow on it.

"It isn't gay to dress up as a cow and get railed in the ass," said no one ever.
 
The men described in the article are men with a sodomy fetish. If they are still physically and emotionally attracted to women but are not emotionally attracted to men, then they are just a certain flavor of bisexual. I suspect that tranny chasers are the same flavor of bisexual man.
 
This is the logical end result of the modern liberal belief in sexual identies/orientations. Prior to the twentieth century, nobody identified as heterosexual or homosexual. Sex was something you did, it was an obligation between a man and a woman driven by biomechanical urges. That reality became too uncomfortable in the last hundred years, so we've switched to a mindset that sex is something that you are. The problem with this idea is that it falls apart with the edge cases. When you look at narcissistic AGP trannies like ContraPoints or Digibro, both of whom were straight for years before they decided to fuck men, it seems hard to believe that they're homosexual in the typical sense. It seems more likely to me that they're narcissistically using these men as a sort of masturbatory aid.
 
Dr Yogurt is gay and fat and I would not have sex with him.

1000002879.jpg
 
lesbians enjoying gay porn
Press "X" to doubt.

I've heard this take before and it always felt way too sus to be true. Romance stories — maybe. But porn? Nope.

The study's "lesbians" are probably fujoshits who label themselves as such in order to further alienate themselves from the men they fetishise. Just like in case with "straight" men into traps and other subcategories of gay porn, these lovely ladies are at least bi. Some may even be hets who just like their men pegging-levels of submissive, and think sex between two effeminite anime boys is the most sapphic thing ever. It's all about their insecurities and the desire to appear a certain way in the eyes of the groups they seek approval of.

Ain't no way you are into women only if you're that obsessed with dick, guys and gals.
 
I think Buddy might be trying to construct a post hoc argument for him blowing a nigger behind a dumpster somewhere.
 
Next stop on the Clown World Express: "why raping kids doesn't mean you're a paedophile" by Dr Moshe Shekelblatt.
 
So I feel the need to state the obvious because clearly nobody's ever said it to him.

No, straight men cannot have sex with other men and still be straight. A man having sex with a man is a homosexual act, also known colloquially as "gay." That is what "gay" means. If you are male and have sex with a male, you have engaged in homosexuality and are not straight.

Why the fuck has no one (apparently) ever said this to him? Why the fuck did this idiot interviewer not do so?
 
I suppose men who have sex with women but aren't "attracted to them romantically" now count as celibate monks.
 
Back
Top Bottom