Social Justice Warriors - Now With Less Feminism Sperging

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Capsaicin Addict said:
I often curse my own integrity, because dammit I know I am smarter and nastier than these jackasses. I could rob them blind and they would thank me for it.
Click to expand...
>tfw you could make millions scamming
>but you have a conscience
>why can't you away conscience
 
Jonah Hill poster said:
Well, the one thing I gathered from this is that someone attempted to explain the cartoon through quote tweet form on X/Twitter:

View attachment 6447666View attachment 6447667

He didn’t make the cartoon, but his quote tweet did managed to get twice the amount of likes in the ten thousands. Plus, he’s Korean-American.
Click to expand...

Koreans seem to be making based public takes lately, compared to their Chinese and Japanese bros. Is there a resurgence of Roof Koreans? Here's another brutal tweet (about the delayed release of Assassin's Creed Shadows:

 
IMG_0719.jpeg
It even has the upside down triangle that Null put into place, though through a different color
 
Why do SJWs like to pretend that it's as if feminism and the Civil Rights Movement never happened with men vs. women and whites vs. "people of color"? For example, SJWs like claiming men and whites are still "privileged" with "patriarchy" and "systemic racism" still ongoing, while in reality Clown World treats men and whites like crap?
 
I'm seeing a lot of progressives arguing with conservatives that they never supported Velma because it was a garbage show that didn't have Scooby in it. Can anyone please explain to me how the people who preach about DEI, misandry, anti-white racism, obnoxious feminist messaging, or cringe inducing LGBT propaganda don't support shows like this that had it all? How is it that SJWs demand those things, but when said show does it they don't watch it? It really makes me wonder if they took issue with the fact that the show portrays toxic ideas they very much hold dear with brutal honesty, in an extremely uncool way. Though this show did not do this deliberately - it did this because Mindy Kaling is a hack who thinks subtlety is a new seasonal flavor of Chai at Starbucks. Even weirder was seeing progressives coping on social media about the show being a conservative psyop.
Screenshot 2024-10-08 185419.png
 
Jacques1194 said:
I'm seeing a lot of progressives arguing with conservatives that they never supported Velma because it was a garbage show that didn't have Scooby in it. Can anyone please explain to me how the people who preach about DEI, misandry, anti-white racism, obnoxious feminist messaging, or cringe inducing LGBT propaganda don't support shows like this that had it all? How is it that SJWs demand those things, but when said show does it they don't watch it? It really makes me wonder if they took issue with the fact that the show portrays toxic ideas they very much hold dear with brutal honesty, in an extremely uncool way. Though this show did not do this deliberately - it did this because Mindy Kaling is a hack who thinks subtlety is a new seasonal flavor of Chai at Starbucks. Even weirder was seeing progressives coping on social media about the show being a conservative psyop.
View attachment 6504845
Click to expand...
The simple answer is that they are cowards who don't stand by what they believe when it flops on its ass and is laughed at. They know they got clowned on for Velma, so they deny ever liking it to deny you a win on them.
 
Jacques1194 said:
I'm seeing a lot of progressives arguing with conservatives that they never supported Velma because it was a garbage show that didn't have Scooby in it.
Click to expand...
Imagine the sheer level of retardation you have to be operating at to think you can make a Scooby-Doo without goddamn Scooby in it. Pure stupidity.

Also yet another example of ginger erasure. Imagine turning this ginger nerd into a shitskin street-shitter and thinking that would fly.
 
another SJW tactic:

Calling all who oppose censorship of male sexuality "gooners" -- goal is clearly shaming them into accepting the endless puritanical demonizing of straight male sexuality.

I imagine that quite a number of SJWs meanwhile are "gooners" for freakish or even immoral fetishes.
 
AnOminous said:
Imagine the sheer level of retardation you have to be operating at to think you can make a Scooby-Doo without goddamn Scooby in it. Pure stupidity.

Also yet another example of ginger erasure. Imagine turning this ginger nerd into a shitskin street-shitter and thinking that would fly.
Click to expand...
There's a rumor going around that "Velma" was supposed to be an original series, but the parent company holds the Scooby-Doo IP so they said they had to shift things to make it wear a Scooby-skin.
 
There's now discourse over Indigenous rage and ancestral spirits and hurricanes now. Trust the Science Redditors are now at war with browns who just hate them for being white.
This Cree bitch, who likely had.a female relative "tamed" by the white man, wants Redditors to stop mocking her people's spirituality.
Screenshot_20241012-145703_(1).png
Such stewards of the land, they'd burn more land than the Europeans ever did in the name of terraforming.

Dismissing those belief systems in favour of meteorological evidence is just white splaining and colonization.
Screenshot_20241012-145732_(1).png

A half black, half Choctaw nigger pooner also lays down the law on racism and climate change, because only white people caused mass extinctions (forgetting Natives wiped out the original North American horse and mastodon).
Screenshot_20241012-150153_(1).png
It's against blood quantum because that's colorism:

Screenshot_20241012-150225_(1).png
Is an even better nigger because it's darker skinned:

Screenshot_20241012-150255_(1).png
Miscellaneous postings, as well as a face dox. Mama liked that chocolate.
Screenshot_20241012-143314_(1).png
The creature is on the bottom left.
Screenshot_20241012-143438_(1).png
Yes, that's a woman pretending to be man, saying they're a better black because they're darker. Mama must've been desperate for that BBC.



Screenshot_20241012-143530_(1).png

Don't tell indigenous people their leaders engaged in rape during their spiritual sessions, you fucking weirdo.

Screenshot_20241012-150621_(1).png
A native Hawaiian with a pig icon (the irony, as pigs are not native to those islands and destroyed many species) says white people aren't native anywhere and have no connection to their land.
Screenshot_20241012-150344_(1).png
They're also bi, and was groomed as a child:
Screenshot_20241012-150035_(1).png
It's not meant to be taken literally,boo:
Screenshot_20241012-150703_(1).png
Why use our language them, Redskin? Go back to Siberia.
Screenshot_20241012-150744_(1).png
Lmao. How much you wanna bet this fat fuck is homeless like the rest of them are? No complaints about Koreans buying up their land and forcing them out.
Podcast the Trillbillies, who celebrated Haitian mass murder, now talks about Washington's teeth.
Screenshot_20241012-153511_(1).png
He paid for those teeth, he didn't just yank them out. he also used animal teeth.
 
LateNightMuffin said:
I don't think anybody yanked out teeth. Teeth were often harvested from dead people. Often, after battles in the Napoleonic era, locals would come out to pull the teeth of casualties to sell for dentures in cities.
Click to expand...
Historically dead people put up much less of a fuss when you remove their body parts, and you don't have to pay them or their owner. Treating a battlefield as a pick-and-pull is a problem somehow, but people never shut up about every-part-of-the-buffalo.

Choosing a slave out of the lobster tank for tooth-harvest would fit nicely in Imperium of Man, though.
 
Jacques1194 said:
Can anyone please explain to me how the people who preach about DEI, misandry, anti-white racism, obnoxious feminist messaging, or cringe inducing LGBT propaganda don't support shows like this that had it all?
Click to expand...
They aren't trying to entertain themselves, they are running a political campaign. The campaign staff and their volunteers are not the target audience for a campaign ad.
 
Hunter Hearst Helmsley said:
They aren't trying to entertain themselves, they are running a political campaign. The campaign staff and their volunteers are not the target audience for a campaign ad.
Click to expand...
Pretty much this. They don't want to watch this unwatchable garbage. They want to force YOU to.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom