I am gay and retarded and assume private keys are such a fucking complex topic that people from a linux thread can't understand them
So nigger me this. If Brave suddenly dies how do you use Brave sync without their services, even if it's still signed with their key?
Arch uses a key they got from somewhere, if you check the links people in this discussion gave you can see the actual maintainer talking about it. But hey, you're so smart, you know what keys are so you don't need to read, right?
I wasn't hating on Brave, I wasn't even saying it's not open source, I was just saying to me it should be called an open source "version", because if those who run the closed source api shut it down for whatever reason those features are not usable anymore, so those features are not open source. Should open source software be free of proprietary shit? Of course not, but when you're the company controlling both the open source and proprietary shit and you're claiming to be for oss and all that stuff isn't it at least
odd that you're not actually open sourcing some pretty core features, such as Brave Sync? Moreover, what if there's some actual issue with it, how would anyone know?
Not every feature of something should be open source, but the brave team was discussing(again, in the links you didn't read) creating a
Bravium which only has the open source features without any of the brave-key-needed ones. Isn't that a bit off? If it's open source already why would you make an opener source one instead of just, I don't know, making a public repo for brave sync and others?
Just because something isn't necessarily super bad doesn't mean you can't criticize its bad points, however minor they may be to people, and what I said is not at all misinformation. If it is misinformation, it should be incredibly easy for you to explain how the proprietary services in the brave browser could function if brave as a company died right now and shut off their servers.