💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.4%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 279 39.6%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.3%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 174 24.7%
  • Total voters
    705
Strix454 said:
From everything else he said, its clear that his kids still mean nothing to him, that he has not the slightest regret about what he put them through or what he did to them. The ONLY thing that man loves is cocaine. He feels bad (or "suicidal") because he can't get drunk or high in the way he wants to because of the potential legal consequences to him.

Suicide baiting for him is just another gaslighting technique. He wants the world to enable his behavior just like his wife and parents enable his behavior.
Click to expand...
My EX had a similar mindset did the 3day a week one.. Got caught again a year or 3 later did full in person.. And still uses to this day (even if they think no one knows).. His kids are going to have it rough.. Therapy is key continued is recommended.. Removal is ideal if it can be done.. BALDO will have to want to change inorder to restore process for family to even stick.. 3-5 if they wake up. 10-End Of Life if they fall back in or never fully get the wake up message..
 
Balldo's Gate said:
The judge's order was filed today, somewhat earlier than expected, following the omnibus hearing in Nick Rekieta's case and the filings by Nick's lawyer and the state.

The results?

Rekieta's motion for Franks hearing: DENIED
Rekieta's motion to suppress evidence: DENIED
All other omnibus issues not argued with particularity or otherwise specifically identified to the Court: DENIED (having been deemed to be waived by Rekieta)

View attachment 6450437View attachment 6450436View attachment 6450435View attachment 6450432View attachment 6450431View attachment 6450430View attachment 6450429View attachment 6450428View attachment 6450425View attachment 6450423View attachment 6450422View attachment 6450421View attachment 6450420

View attachment 6450448
Click to expand...
Balldo's Gate said:
I will try to summarize it in 1 word

DENIED

Nick Rekieta lost on EVERYTHING at the omnibus stage, including any issues his bumbling Barneswalking lawyer failed to argue with particularity or otherwise specifically identify.
Click to expand...
Get fucked Balldo-wearing junkie.

You are an embarrassment to literally everything.
 
Xander from the Future said:
Channels when they stop growing more or less hit a relatively "stagnant" minor growth. Think 1000 subs every month or so, etc.
Youtube just does this by directing "just" enough traffic to keep a channel floating. It's artificial but generally if a channel is doing well youtube won't derank a previously successful channel.
Click to expand...
While of course all of Youtube is the work of human hands and in that sense artificial, I don't think this effect is necessarily artificial in the sense of being the intentional outcome of a particular action. Youtube wants to recommend videos and channels that viewers will watch, because more viewership means more ad revenue. The best predictor of what people will like is... things that are already popular.

So you have Youtube recommending videos and channels that get a lot of views and viewers watching videos and channels that are frequently recommended. This is positive feedback (in the technical sense, not the popular sense) and explains why random garbage suddenly becomes very popular and why a formerly popular channel would remain popular and then suddenly drop off.
 
DENIED

Time for a drunken cokestream Nick. You need to tell this so-called judge and all the rest of them what you really think. Lay down some real truth those damn no-nothing Kiwi Incel prudes, fat Sean, Aaron and all the rest of them

Its NOT your FAULT Nick. Barneswalker Frank FAILED you in court. All the facts were on your side. Your constitutional rights and such.

And you need to Appeal this all the way to the US Supreme Court if necessary. HIRE BARNES! Put all Grandpa's money into this. There is no other way.
 
Based upon the Court’s review of the video, Deputy Pomplun’s descriptions are an accurate representation of Defendant during the May 21, 2024 video.
Click to expand...
The judge reviewed the video because Nick made him. He fucked himself on a scale that is hard to describe.

Even if the video of Defendant was a copy taken from a third-party posting, there is no suggestion that the content itself was doctored, clipped, altered, or otherwise changed.
Click to expand...
Damn, if only someone could have predicted this outcome. So weird, no actual changes to the video.

When that image is cross referenced with the full video of Exhibit 10, the same image appears at the corresponding timestamp.
[...]
When the image of Exhibit 4 is cross referenced with the full video of Exhibit 10, the same image appears at the corresponding timestamp. There is no evidence that the images of Exhibit 2 and 4 are an inaccurate depiction of Defendant’s May 21, 2024 video.
Click to expand...

Gotta hand it to Meme Copium and Sean who both did a frame comparison to show that the videos were identical. The judge concurs.


Defendant also argues Deputy Pomplun did not watch the entire May 21, 2024 video[...]
[...]
Most notably, Deputy Pomplun asserts in the affidavit that he watched the entirety of Defendant’s May 21, 2024 video that was disclosed to Defendant and provided to the Court.
Click to expand...
The fucking morons argued that Pomplun never watched the entire video, while it was explicitly stated that he did. And the judge calls them out for it.
lmao, they are so fucked.



I really can't even right now.
 
Well, holy shit, Nick! I thought the Farms was completely wrong, or at least that's what you said! Why, it's ALMOST as if you don't know what the fuck you're talking about! ROFLMAO!!!

Nicky, Nicky, Nicky... Your opinions regarding Kiwi Farms are just as worthless as your legal analysis. Surprised you haven't used the diploma you "earned" from law school as toilet paper, since that's all it's good for... LOL! GET FUCKED, BUDDY!!!

edit: a word
 
Last edited:
Xander from the Future said:
Just checked.
Fun little fact about youtube. At least from what I personally have noticed.
Channels when they stop growing more or less hit a relatively "stagnant" minor growth. Think 1000 subs every month or so, etc.
Youtube just does this by directing "just" enough traffic to keep a channel floating. It's artificial but generally if a channel is doing well youtube won't derank a previously successful channel.
And when they do, it's real noticeable. Like Leafy. Most channels will never experience this in their life time until the creator stops making content.
Since November last year, he's been fucking losing 2k subs a month. That's Sterling levels of bleed out. And it hasn't stopped. Infact it's hit even 3-4k bleed out a month before. All organic.
View attachment 6449680
He's entering channel death spiral now. Just like Sterling.
Compare the two.
View attachment 6449676
View attachment 6449677
Click to expand...
Your post make me want to go look at his stats on Social Blade. Curiously, it looks like he either deleted or made a video private yesterday.
1727196804468.png


I'm not sure which one is no longer showing, but the drop in video views usually indicates a deleted video or a video made private.

Nevermind. Comparing the videos on Rumble, it seems to be the 10 minute stream from 3 days ago.
 
Last edited:
If Nick was wrong about others' cases, how could anyone expect him to be right about his own case? Locals felted.
 
The judge has humor, gotta say reading this is funny as hell.

During the course of searching for the items named in the warrant, firearms and ammunition were discovered in areas where drugs could be kept during the search. The evidence of controlled substance use was also found during the execution of the search warrant, namely controlled substances and paraphernalia field testing positive for controlled substances, which allowed for immediately seizure and possession of firearms/ammunition as evidence for possession of firearms by a user of controlled substances. The seizure of the firearms/ammunition was lawful. Defendant’s motion to suppress such evidence is respectfully denied.
Click to expand...
Everyone was laughing about the weak arguments, because plain view exception clearly applies.
Legal search for drugs, drugs were found, owning a gun as a drug user is illegal => Seizure of guns.

The only thing Balldo and his Court Jester managed to accomplish is that a judge put it in plain writing that Nick is a drug user, as he wrote "evidence of controlled substance use was also found".

Time to change the thread title to include, "Legally a drug user"
 
Balldo bros I don’t feel so good…

🥃:really: Don’t worry Nick a little bump of cocaine and a glass or three of whiskey will set you right and make that stress fade away 🥃:really:

Maybe do a stream on how those Minnesotan prudes don’t know a damn thing about law and how this violates your constitutional rights? Please?
 
Last edited:
Nick, my advice to you (as one person that knows nothing about the law to someone else that knows nothing about the law) is to keep it up. You're doing great, champ.
 
Third World Aristocrat said:
Do you think we’ll get a Rekieta seethe stream today?
Click to expand...
Nick doesn't have the balls to stream. Yeah, Nick, I said it -- you're a gutless coward and you won't stream to give YOUR side of the story here! LOL, keep enjoyin' those L's, you non-practicing pussy!

Of course, he COULD prove me wrong, but I'd have a better chance of seeing God today than for him to do that...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom