💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.5%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 171 24.4%

  • Total voters
    701
It's funny knowing that with everything else Nick has going on right now, he has a fat retard that is going to expect to be accommodated at the palatial Casa de Rekieta. The same fat retard that called his wife a slatternly whore and his children a brood of retards. The same fat retard he made up with at Dax's direction. He knows Ralph smells. He knows Ralph will be insufferable. He knows Ralph will call even more attention to all of this.

Imagine having to walk on eggshells to placate a fat retard so that he won't add to your embarrassment! Couldn't be me!

Better handle this one delicately, Nick.

Suffah!
 
The issue these studies had with the tests is that it’s hard to wash specifically cocaine off of hair samples. This is because cocaine can be present on the outside of the hair (environmental exposure) and the inside of the hair (consumption), as it is not all metabolized. So testing directly for cocaine will give you many more false positives than testing for metabolites.
This is his argument, although they're not specific enough about their 'exposure' theory to allow people to address the point directly. They know exactly what they are doing - even Dick and Ralph are sweeping this on X, but can't address people when they bring up metabolites.

The reality is if it was only the cocaine molecule found in the test, and not any metabolites, the lab would have identified this as an anomaly - Minnesota Monitoring doesn't provide publicly how they interpret different findings, but I highly doubt the scientists and lab techs would look at such a result and fail to consider sample contamination as the most likely cause of the result.

The fact is these tests are deemed highly reliable by courts across the globe, and it's not like it's a new technology - it's decades old! All the different permutations of results, and what they mean, will have been encountered and understood long ago. Nick and his gaggle of retarded followers aren't going to be the ones to overturn follicle testing.
 
It's funny knowing that with everything else Nick has going on right now, he has a fat retard that is going to expect to be accommodated at the palatial Casa de Rekieta.

Oh shit you’re right. Ralph is going to expect to be taken care of at Rekeita’s house. The same house where (allegedly) Nick’s kids are right now with their grandparents. Or worse, without their grandparents.

If that’s the story Nick wants to go with, then this could turn really dark, really quickly. I don’t want to imagine Ralph around children. (This is, of course, expecting that anything Rekeita says is true. Which is unlikely.)
 
Ralph is going to expect to be taken care of at Rekeita’s house. The same house where (allegedly) Nick’s kids are right now with their grandparents.
If Nick does open his home to Ralph and Ralph turns on Rekieta like he did 2 years ago after the shart stream, we’re going to hear all about what life is like there. Ralph + Steel Toe appearance when?
 
The Barneswalker's motion to dismiss because THAT'S BULLSHIT AND YOU KNOW IT, or whatever, has dropped. I'll attach it here as well.
DEFENDANT’S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO VOID WARRANT, SUPPRESS EVIDENCE, AND DISMISS CHARGES FOR LACK OF PROBABLE CAUSE

Edit: The tool I thought would convert the whole PDF to an image isn't working, so here is just the PDF.
 

Attachments

Nick has filed for a motion to dismiss based on lack of probable cause. Reading through it now. Already Nick claims that the appeals loss coke stream is inadmissible because it was clipped from the original and makes him look bad lmao.

-Nick states that his coke stream that he has since deleted off of YouTube can’t be used as evidence because any copy of it is considered a clipped copy and may misrepresent his words.
-He claims that since the stream was privated, that in order for Aaron to have legally viewed the stream, he would’ve needed to have served a warrant to Google and Alphabet for the 4 hour stream.
-Nick claims that because April willingly gave statements after she was mirandized and asked for a lawyer, those statements should be thrown out.

The whole thing feels like Nick is grasping at straws. Just throwing stuff at the wall hoping it sticks.
 
Last edited:
Nick has filed for a motion to dismiss based on lack of probable cause. Reading through it now. Already Nick claims that the appeals loss coke stream is inadmissible because it was clipped from the original and makes him look bad lmao.
So rule of completeness just makes the judge have to watch the whole stream including the 45 minutes of dead air when he was huffing booger sugar?

Maybe he'll call in Metokur as a witness lol.
 
KAYLA HAS A LAWYER! Kayla has retained her lawyer from the CHIPS case in her criminal case as well. She is requesting a continuance because her lawyer has a conflict at what she believes to be the time of the hearing.

Note: it is not the actual time of the hearing, it is the time that the hearing WAS scheduled before requesting a new judge back in May, the hearing date was changed over 2 months ago.

Images in below post:
Kayla's attorney for the CHIPS case has filed a certificate of representation in the criminal case for Kayla. She also filed a disclosure request.

Kayla is requesting a CONTINUANCE for the August 20 hearing at 2:45pm because her new attorney has a conflict at that time.....

Wait a second. The hearing is on Wednesday, wasn't it?

Kayla's attorney is citing the old hearing date which was cancelled when Nick and Kayla switched judges.
 
Welp, here's our answer. He's gonna fight...

Screenshot_20240819-081145~2.png

Wut?

Altered how? The stream on his YouTube and Rumble channels is a full and accurate copy of the stream. It's even still up on his Bitchute, I believe.

Then they go on to say that he privated the video on both platforms. Which is true, but they easily could have gotten a copy before then. He didn't private it until many hours later. I assumed they might have been watching live and gotten a copy immediately.

They're really gonna claim that stream didn't happen like everybody SAW it happened, aren't they?

Okay.

EDIT: Saw, not said (although both are true)
 
Last edited:
Welp, here's our answer. He's gonna fight...

View attachment 6323667
Wut?

Altered how? The stream on his YouTube and Rumble channels is a full and accurate copy of the stream. It's even still up on his Bitchute, I believe.

Then they go on to say that he privated the video on both platforms. Which is true, but they easily could have gotten a copy before then. He didn't private it until many hours later. I assumed they might have been watching live and gotten a copy immediately.

They're really gonna claim that stream didn't happen like everybody says it happened, aren't they?

Okay.
This is the video that the detective watched according to the motion
1724081122970.png
I think he means the channel link by "watermark". I don't think that is correct. Also, it's not modified as far as I can see
 
Then they go on to say that he privated the video on both platforms. Which is true, but they easily could have gotten a copy before then. He didn't private it until many hours later. I assumed they might have been watching live and gotten a copy immediately.

They're really gonna claim that stream didn't happen like everybody says it happened, aren't they?
I suspect the version entered into evidence isn't Nick's original. We do not have the evidence.
not_orig_video.jpg
 
Welp, here's our answer. He's gonna fight...

Our prayers are answered, The milk will flow free in the coming months, my fellow farmers.

You show 'em, Nick. What the hell do these practicing lawyers know about anything? You need to stand up in court and object loudly at every available opportunity. Don't rely on that pussy Barneswalker to do it for you. That Baby Herman impersonating lamo can't be trusted. You should sack him, appoint Ralph as your Mackenzie Friend and represent yourself in this matter.

We're all counting on you.
 
Welp, here's our answer. He's gonna fight...

View attachment 6323667
Wut?

Altered how? The stream on his YouTube and Rumble channels is a full and accurate copy of the stream. It's even still up on his Bitchute, I believe.

Then they go on to say that he privated the video on both platforms. Which is true, but they easily could have gotten a copy before then. He didn't private it until many hours later. I assumed they might have been watching live and gotten a copy immediately.

They're really gonna claim that stream didn't happen like everybody SAW it happened, aren't they?

Okay.

EDIT: Saw, not said
ah yes our expert kiwi editors must have edited in the "anime sucks.... cope and sneed" bit
 
From what I've seen of this Barneswalker's performance so far most of the arguments he makes are probably a little dumb but I don't know enough about the law to really have any opinion on them. What does interest me is that they're claiming here April was questioned by Detective Pomplun after she was read her Miranda rights and asked for a lawyer, and after Pomplun was told she had asked for a lawyer:
1724081228134.png 1724081256983.png
The citations for this are all just a bunch of as-yet unreleased .mp4 files unfortunately. Or at least, I don't know of them being released.
1724081352785.png
1724081389097.png
 
Back
Top Bottom