💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 157 22.5%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    697
Null said:
View attachment 6310543View attachment 6310544View attachment 6310545View attachment 6310546View attachment 6310547View attachment 6310548View attachment 6310549View attachment 6310550View attachment 6310551
Click to expand...
"...the public will have the right to attend, only they may not be able to attend from the comfort of their recliners and in their pajamas."

"...public access does not require every proceeding be rendered into ones and zeroes with unfettered abandon."

"Allowing the recording and broadcasting of these proceedings would be like punishing a child who raided the cookie jar by giving him the rest of the cookies."

What an absolute drama queen. Is this kind of flamboyant prose typical in court filings?
 
Schwarzwald said:
What do you have to hide, Nick?
Click to expand...
You know, that is a good question. What are you hiding Nick? Surely if you're about to take a plea deal, we'll all find out anyway. It's public record, we'll figure it out one way or another. So what's the point of preventing us from filming your plea deal with the state? Unless.....

You didn't get a plea deal, did you Nick?
 
Oxous said:
View attachment 6310608
Welp, wrap it up guys. Someone shouted nigger during Nick's first appearance so we don't have the right privilege to transparency in this trial anymore.
Click to expand...
what kind of legal argument is this anyhow lmfao. "its like giving children cookies!" A+ filing there. Literally Patrick/Greer Tier filing. Is rackets coked up when he submits this shit to his lawyer to file?
 
As retarded as "a pedophile is jumping through the hoops to involve himself in court proceedings, just to record footage of children, which he could do for free anywhere else" is, this Jason character might have fucked it by involving himself. Now Nick has a valid excuse to use his children as a shield against being recorded in court.
 
Null said:
View attachment 6310543View attachment 6310544View attachment 6310545View attachment 6310546View attachment 6310547View attachment 6310548View attachment 6310549View attachment 6310550View attachment 6310551
Click to expand...
Hooo boy....

1. OK, if his concern is that his children will be broadcast then cameras can be placed under the control of the court and a partition erected to ensure that a minor defendant on the witness stand is not visible outside the courtroom. It's not like that hasn't been done before.

2. OK, if his concern is about the person in question being a registered sex offender then someone else can be chosen.

TL;DR His objections are irrelevant and Nick Rekieta remains a coked up faggot with a broke dick.
 
Null said:
View attachment 6310544View attachment 6310545
Click to expand...
Am I retarded or is the clause that he cites at the end specifically for when minors make an appearance in court? I've seen cases before where minors take the stands, and the cameras are either cut, or a transcript of the child's statements are overlayed on the screen.

Null said:
Responsive Motion - 20240815 - 34-CR-24-341 (Rekieta N.)-images-7.jpg
Click to expand...
This entire filing is ludicrously unprofessional, but the last paragraph is especially egregious. The public is not a single entity which is to be rewarded or punished based on certain individual's behaviors.
 
Null said:
He's basically hinging his entire argument off this fucking imbecile who I will crucify if I find out his username -- assuming he even has one or the person in this even sent this mail.
Click to expand...
We sure Rackets didn't just send this in the name of a pedophile he found on the register to try and justify his argument that releasing the bodycam footage will be feeding pedos?
 
With all the writhing and flailing this crack addled dotard is doing with how inconsistent he is being about his positions on televised legal proceedings and transparency there is one thing for certain. Whatever we are going to see is going to be  entertaining beyond all measure.

He is afraid.
 
Im surprised Law and Crime isn’t trying to stream this: they did a video on Nick’s case already and I would think they’d have an axe to grind with him for using their coverage without permission previously.
 
For a guy who supposedly didn’t do anything wrong or take drugs around his kids and is just a big sad target of the evil police/government, Nick sure is desperate to hide literally everything he can about the case.
 
1723738823186.png
1723738843704.png
Why does the request email say 950 25th St NW when the sex offender registry says 900 block of 25th Street NW?
Edit: 900 is a city block. I'm a retard.
 
Last edited:
He is constantly streaming in public himself about all the details of his case and making criminal accusations against people involved. Yet his attorney is concerned about tainting the jury pool if any of the court proceedings are made available.
 
Null said:
"muh keedz"
t. man whose 8 year old daughter tested positive for cocaine
Click to expand...
Wanted: ESCAPED personal responsibility.
Kheapathic said:
That'd be a bold move, especially as those pesky lawmen can come here and get all the juicy bits, complete with time stamps if needed.
Click to expand...
He said it himself...
[...] it's not going to happen on a local stream um except government it is one 100% going to happen on a local stream. um all government actors who want access to the my =exclusive talks about nothing but my case and all the details can join at the $150 a month level on locals if you joinat the $150 a month uh level on locals and submit to me your government identification. I will automatically share all of the details of my case and my legal strategy will have exclusive interviews with my lawyer well we'll type everything out in public there you go I'll make that you can you don't have to wait for a Local's tier on it they don't do it you can personally take the option $150 a month plus you'll have to personally send me a copy of your government ID and you'll get exclusive access to everything about my case straight from the source.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom