📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
There’s an elderly Bri’ish tranny whose social media posting is mostly just retweeting standard TRA talking points. So far, so normal. That isn’t what got him mentioned in Parliament, so maybe it’s a stretch to put him here, but we need something amusing after the last couple of pages.

What did get Saorsa-Amatheia Tweedale mentioned in Parliament? His fashion sense. As a longtime civil servant and activist, including as one of the two co-chairs of the civil service LGBT+ network, he knows the importance of a professional appearance. Here’s the photo he uses on the LGBT+ network page.

IMG_4118.jpeg
link | archive

This is not a one-off - he actually turns up to work looking like this. The Civil Service Code states that they should “always act in a way that is professional and that deserves the confidence of all those you deal with”. I suppose low-cut black corsets, fishnet tights with high heels and a pentagram choker inspires confidence if you only deal with drooling perverts. Watch out King Cobra, there’s another contender for your title of sexy bad boy goth.

You’ll be astonished to learn last year lesbians and women in his department complained he was bullying them in his promotion of trans ideology.

The two questions in Parliament are a hoot:

“To ask His Majesty’s Government what is their policy on civil servants wearing fetish clothing in the workplace.”

“To ask His Majesty’s Government whether they consider Bondage, Domination, Sadism, and Masochism to be a protected characteristic within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010.”

Totally not a fetish, you Tory terf!

Oh and here he is more soberly dressed

IMG_4120.jpeg

Imagine that yelling at you for not loving the girldique.

Transgender civil servant wearing ‘fetish gear’ sparks Whitehall row​

Staff at the Department for Work and Pensions are allegedly uncomfortable with the workwear choices of one of their colleagues

By Dominic Penna, POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT4 August 2024 • 5:57pm

A Whitehall row has broken out over whether employees can wear “fetish gear” following complaints about a transgender civil servant.

Staff at the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) have reportedly objected to the workwear choices of Saorsa-Amatheia Tweedale, who is a trans woman.

The row is believed to have prompted Baroness Jenkin, a Tory peer, to table two written questions in Parliament about fetish clothing and bondage.

It was not immediately clear whether Lady Jenkin, who was approached for comment, tabled the questions in relation to the row surrounding Ms Tweedale.

Ms Tweedale, 58, is one of two co-chairmen of the LGBT+ Civil Service Network and helped to establish the first transgender network in the department.

She is said to regularly wear low-cut black corsets, fishnet tights with high heels and a gothic choker with a pentagram when she attends the office.

‘Gothic evening wear’​

One source told the Mail on Sunday, which first reported the row, the attire looked “almost like fetish gear”.

“At a stretch it looks like gothic evening wear but really it’s very strange,” they said.

“If you worked in a bank or any office job, you couldn’t wear that kind of stuff, whether you’re a woman or a man… It’s a highly inappropriate attire to wear.

“There is an expectation [of] people in their role and that they would look appropriate to do that role.”

The Civil Service Code states that mandarins should “always act in a way that is professional and that deserves the confidence of all those you deal with”.

While many departments do not have specific dress codes, past guidance has specified the need to “present a smart or professional appearance” at work in at least “some instances”.

A written question submitted by Lady Jenkin last week read: “To ask His Majesty’s Government what is their policy on civil servants wearing fetish clothing in the workplace.”

A follow-up question published two days later added: “To ask His Majesty’s Government whether they consider Bondage, Domination, Sadism, and Masochism to be a protected characteristic within the meaning of the Equality Act 2010.”

It is not the first time Ms Tweedale has prompted controversy in the department.

Last year, civil servants wrote to Peter Schofield, the permanent secretary at the DWP, warning of the “chilling effect” of gender ideology.

“Lesbians and women generally in the department are being silenced in the workplace and our rights are being undermined,” the letter said.

‘Ideological takeover’​

Ms Tweedale was singled out specifically amid claims she had played “a key role in the attempted ideological takeover” of the department.

The diversity ambassador has previously told civil servants who work in schools that children demanding puberty blockers should matter more than their “parents’ will”.

She also claimed the belief that sex is binary is not “the modern scientific view”, saying: “There are as many genders as there are individuals because we’re all unique individuals.”

In an online lecture given in October last year, Ms Tweedale said: “What really gets me is when you’re challenging a trans child’s knowledge of who they are and say that parents take precedence.

“That poses a big danger to women and girls because it challenges Gillick competency… it’s very clear, if a child is old enough to understand the consequences of the medication and treatment they are asking for, their will takes precedence over that of the parent.”

Writing on her X account, Ms Tweedale said in 2021 that gender-critical trade union members – who assert the primacy of biological sex – “make me laugh”.

During a row over Labour’s position on transgender issues the same year, she wrote: “I stand with Emily Thornberry. One of my best friends is a man who quite definitely has a cervix.”

The DWP and Ms Tweedale were contacted for comment.

paywalled link
Daily Mail version
 
All I asked you was if dudes with XX chromosomes and a dick should be allowed in women's sports and you sperged out like a bigger. It's a simple question and I'm sure any rational person should be able to answer it
Nobody cares because we've seen this game from trannies before. You can cite all the super rare disorders you want. none of them mean that a man putting on a dress magically becomes a woman.
 
2013 series
"Why Would you go through that?"
outspoken-why-go-through-that1.png

I think it's hilarious we're already emphasizing by title that trans is a dumb ass decision lmao and why would you want it? 2 FtMs, 4 MtFs tell their stories.
Exposes that complications with trans surgery were fully known of before 2018 documentary Born to Be.
outspoken-why-go-through-that2.png

OUT Tv provides the 51 min long documentary, but wait who is OUT Tv?
you mean coming out of the closet? like gays? OUUUUUTTT tv? it can't be that, can it?
outspoken-why-go-through-that.png
okay it's exactly that, but you knew that, right?
I'm watching this right now so I assume I'll be back later about it.
 
All I asked you was if dudes with XX chromosomes and a dick should be allowed in women's sports and you sperged out like a bigger. It's a simple question and I'm sure any rational person should be able to answer it
There are no XX women with dicks tho???

1000030215.jpg
1000030216.jpg1000030217.jpg1000030218.jpg1000030219.jpg1000030220.jpg

An big clit doesnt have a urethra going through it and the structure is different and even the dicks that have the urethra in the wrong place dont resemble a clit. Micro peens do not resemble them either

1000030211.jpg1000030221.jpg

Funny plant name
1000030212.jpg
...Cant say it aint named appropriately
 
Nobody cares because we've seen this game from trannies before. You can cite all the super rare disorders you want. none of them mean that a man putting on a dress magically becomes a woman.
I never said that a man with a dress was a women I said a women with XY chromosome born with a vagina is a women
 
All I asked you was if dudes with XX chromosomes and a dick should be allowed in women's sports and you sperged out like a bigger.
you are probably a troon but I'll respond wih sincerity.
first, yes, men with XX chromossomes exist. Its a very rare condition called de la Chapelle syndrome.
the men with this condition are, in fact, male, despite their chromossomes. they had a male differentiation in utero and usually look like normal males, because the gene that causes the male differentiation (named SRY) is most of the time present on one of the X chromossomes a guy with this syndrome has.

their body develop as males and they have male gonads, they are very much males and shouldnt be put in female sports or anything of the sort.

but that isnt the real issue here is it? Troons dont have de la chapelle, nor any other intersex conditions known to men. You all just like using people with legitimate intersex conditions as scapegoats to allow you all to invade female spaces.
Troons are for the most part, perfectly normal XY males with male phenotype, dont piggyback on intersex people to push your stupid agenda.
 
Nothing I've seen has been funny and he's kept the joke going a really long time. I guess he's just deeply unwell and farming hate from all sides just for attention??
This guy is uncanny. It does look like it should be satire, but it's just... not.

I think the confusing part is keeping a very male hairstyle, while being dressed up and wearing makeup. If he had a wig, he'd be easier for people to slot into their understanding as a hon.

Maybe this is what that Canadian teacher with the fake breasts would have looked like if he were young and height-weight proportionate.
 
Intersex people are a small enough subset of humans they should be either:
  • Excluded from conventional sports
  • Forced to participate in the men's category
  • Put into their own category similar to all the other special athletes.
There are special/para Olympic runners who can hit times in the 100m within a second of the world record yet they are not on the Olympic team. Why can troons be allowed to enter female events like lifting and boxing but if you are blind you are disqualified all together?
 
I
you are probably a troon but I'll respond wih sincerity.
first, yes, men with XX chromossomes exist. Its a very rare condition called de la Chapelle syndrome.
the men with this condition are, in fact, male, despite their chromossomes.
Thats exactly what I've been trying to explain is that people born with phenotypicaly female genetals are in fact female, not men in disguise. I don't care about trans people.
 
Thats exactly what I've been trying to explain is that people born with phenotypicaly female genetals are in fact female, not men in disguise. I don't care about trans people.
No, thats not how it works at all. In some DSDs men can be born with phenotipicaly female genitals, but have male gonads and male differentiation/puberty. in this case, they are 100% males, even without having a penis.
Much like a troon that butchers his penis, he is still a man.

And if this is the case for Imane Khalif like you are arguing, he is still completely male.
 
No, thats not how it works at all. In some DSDs men can be born with phenotipicaly female genitals, but have male gonads and male differentiation/puberty. in this case, they are 100% males, even without having a penis.
Much like a troon that butchers his penis, he is still a man.

And if this is the case for Imane Khalif like you are arguing, he is still completely male.
That's how it's always worked retard. She doesn't have a penis to butcher. I can't believe I'm having to argue that someones sex is is determined by their genitals. 100% male my ass. They are phenotypicaly female
 
That's how it's always worked retard. She doesn't have a penis to butcher. I can't believe I'm having to argue that someones sex is is determined by their genitals. 100% male my ass. They are phenotypicaly female
I love how you are so confidently incorrect to the point of calling me a retard. This shit is literally genetics 101.
Go research about 5-ard, you literal smooth brain.

tldr: male differentiation of gonads into testicles and male genital development = male, with or without penis.
 
2013 series
"Why Would you go through that?"
...
I'm watching this right now so I assume I'll be back later about it.
Here's some from "Why Would You Go Through That?"
A tranny documentary.

More lies about the surgery being 100% fool proof even in 2013, even admitting they did not tell most patients they would experience complications.
Also goes over if a tranny doesn't pay, they are left to rot.

"I'm sure it's advanced, but it's not advanced enough."
The honesty. lol
 
Back
Top Bottom