Science Argentina will use AI to ‘predict future crimes’ but experts worry for citizens’ rights - El Informe de la Minoría

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
2901.jpg
Argentina’s security forces have announced plans to use artificial intelligence to “predict future crimes” in a move experts have warned could threaten citizens’ rights.

The country’s far-right president Javier Milei this week created the Artificial Intelligence Applied to Security Unit, which the legislation says will use “machine-learning algorithms to analyse historical crime data to predict future crimes”. It is also expected to deploy facial recognition software to identify “wanted persons”, patrol social media, and analyse real-time security camera footage to detect suspicious activities.

While the ministry of security has said the new unit will help to “detect potential threats, identify movements of criminal groups or anticipate disturbances”, the Minority Report-esque resolution has sent alarm bells ringing among human rights organisations.

Experts fear that certain groups of society could be overly scrutinised by the technology, and have also raised concerns over who – and how many security forces – will be able to access the information.

Amnesty International warned that the move could infringe on human rights. “Large-scale surveillance affects freedom of expression because it encourages people to self-censor or refrain from sharing their ideas or criticisms if they suspect that everything they comment on, post, or publish is being monitored by security forces,” said Mariela Belski, the executive director of Amnesty International Argentina.

Meanwhile, the Argentine Center for Studies on Freedom of Expression and Access to Information said such technologies have historically been used to “profile academics, journalists, politicians and activists”, which, without supervision, threatens privacy.

Milei, a far-right libertarian, rose to power late last year and has promised a hardline response to tackling crime. His security minister Patricia Bullrich reportedly seeks to replicate El Salvador’s controversial prison model, while the administration is moving towards militarising security policy, according to the Center for Legal and Social Studies. The government has also cracked down on protests, with riot police recently shooting tear gas and rubber bullets at demonstrators at close range, and officials threatening to sanction parents who bring children to marches.

The latest measure has prompted an especially strong reaction in a country with a dark history of state repression; an estimated 30,000 people were forcibly disappeared during its brutal 1976-83 dictatorship, some thrown alive from planes on so-called “death flights”. Thousands were also tortured, and hundreds of children kidnapped.

A ministry of security source said that the new unit will work under the current legislative framework, including the Personal Information Protection Act mandate. It added that it will concentrate in applying AI, data analytics and machine learning to identify criminal patterns and trends in the ministry of security databases.

Article | Archive
 
I keep getting reminded of the Issac Asimov story All the Troubles in the World, where an AI supercomputer is used to predict crime, and dealing with humanity's evils causes the AI to become suicidal.
 
"we will leave you alone, we are libertarians and hate the power of the state even more than you do, trust us, bro"

Lolberts are just more open about transforming nations into economic labor zones for Mr. Shekelstein, but when it comes to depriving people of their god given rights, they're just the same old same old. Fuck them.
 
So much for this new president being the savior of Argentina.
It's interesting to live in an amalgamation of all the dystopian movies I've seen as a kid.
 
I think they tried something like this in the US before and as you can expect, it got called to black areas at a real high rate. So it was raycis. So I guess black people have done some good in their flagrant criminality.
 
The Argie boys need to get back in touch with Fascism, and send this Jewfag to the nether realm, with the rest of his Jewlords.
 
How is it going to predict future crimes, or movements of crime organizations with historical data?

That is wildly speculative by nature, because of the lack of new info that the AI cannot access, unless you plant a spy. You're also not going to predict petty/lesser crimes, like some dudes robbing a random store.

The facial/suspicious activity recognition can easily work, predicting future crimes however, you're going to get a lot of false positives.
 
I can't wait for it to point out the obvious (it's just going do pretty bare bones analysis, let's be real), whatever that happens to be in Argentina, and for the world to scream racism when it does. :story:

But enough about Miniggerty Report jokes, what does the article actually say?
Argentina’s security forces have announced plans to use artificial intelligence to “predict future crimes”
Okay, go on
the Artificial Intelligence Applied to Security Unit, which the legislation says will use “machine-learning algorithms to analyse historical crime data to predict future crimes”.
This is sounding more like analyzing historical data to determine where to focus enforcement actions despite the "predict" part; I'd be curious if the translation is missing something, perhaps due to AI.
It is also expected to deploy facial recognition software to identify “wanted persons”,
We'll see how well that works, results seem mixed so far where it's been used, and it needs humans checking it for obvious flubs.
patrol social media
Every western government already does this, it's how all the hate crime convictions happen.
and analyse real-time security camera footage to detect suspicious activities.
Again, we'll see how well this works, I don't have high hopes.

That said, how is this different from just watching a security camera feed? Is the scale the problem? Because I'm pretty sure it's the GOVERNMENT CAMERA BEING THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE that's the problem in this context, and that comes back to facial recognition shit as well, not that it's monitored, AI or no.
A ministry of security source said that the new unit will work under the current legislative framework, including the Personal Information Protection Act mandate. It added that it will concentrate in applying AI, data analytics and machine learning to identify criminal patterns and trends in the ministry of security databases.
Oh, buried at the bottom of the article is what's actually happening. So it's analyzing data that already exists or already being collected to determine best courses of action, at least that's how that reads to me. (edit: fixed a massively butchered sentence for clarity)

Amnesty International warned that the move could infringe on human rights. “Large-scale surveillance affects freedom of expression because it encourages people to self-censor or refrain from sharing their ideas or criticisms if they suspect that everything they comment on, post, or publish is being monitored by security forces,”
Nigger where the fuck have you been over the last 20 years in the west? What part of 5 eyes's activities is not "large scale surveillance that affects freedom of expression" exactly? Can you please explain that in excruciating detail? Or do you need to get a few government cocks out of your mouth before you can answer that question?

and officials threatening to sanction parents who bring children to marches.
Based.
 
Last edited:
"we will leave you alone, we are libertarians and hate the power of the state even more than you do, trust us, bro"

Lolberts are just more open about transforming nations into economic labor zones for Mr. Shekelstein, but when it comes to depriving people of their god given rights, they're just the same old same old. Fuck them.
I'd almost argue they're not more open about it; they use a tissue paper-thin veneer that implies corporations always do the right thing, and conveniently forget to mention they exist to turn a profit for themselves, and if applicable, their shareholders. They parrot shit about the free market, but it's not rocket science to know corporations care about their continued existence first and foremost.
 
but it's not rocket science to know corporations care about their continued existence first and foremost.
Of course, but the same thing is true about governments: they exist to maintain and expand their own power. Democracy is the most virulent in that regard, since it relies on deception and not coercion.
 
Milei, a far-right libertarian
Lord, I hate journoscum.

Anyway, it's very obvious that AI Crimebot will predict Blacks will be petty drug dealers and violent criminals; Mestizos will rape 14 year olds; Indians will embezzle, etc.
So, AI Crimebot will be accused of racism and shut down, or reprogrammed to make nonsensical predictions about White Male Crime Epidemics.
 
Given how much Milei has made people seethe, the fact the article opens with calling him "far-right" and the fact a bunch of NGOs are throwing themselves into the issue to talk shit about him when the same NGOs are silent when the USA and EU do the same shit to tackle "misinformation and the far-right"...

I am gonna guess this article is massively misrepresenting what is actually going on.
 
The country’s far-right president Javier Milei this week created the Artificial Intelligence Applied to Security Unit, which the legislation says will use “machine-learning algorithms to analyse historical crime data to predict future crimes”.
I was thinking some Minority Report level tech but I get some reskinned and updated Compstat:
This shit has been going on since the 90s.
The country’s far-right president Javier Milei
There we go...when the NYPD uses this tech it's fine but when a libertarian uses its, then they become far right.
 
Back
Top Bottom