💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
Time to pile on. Here's the full transcription of the first KCHHS document for the eldest Rekieta child posted last night by @MNPublicRecords
There is a mistake in your transcription of the documents that were posted.

This line, in reference to Kayla, is correct:
10. Ms. Rekieta will allow KCHHS to conduct scheduled and unscheduled home visits. She will allow KCHHS to access every room in the home.

This line, in reference to Nick, is NOT correct:
10. Mr. Rekieta will allow KCHHS to conduct scheduled and unscheduled home visits. He will allow KCHHS to access every room in the home.

This is what it actually says for Nick:
10. Mr. Rekieta will allow KCHHS to conduct scheduled and unscheduled home visits at both homes on the property. He will allow KCHHS to access every room in both homes.

It's obvious that "both homes" refers to the property that April is supposed to be living in. Technically they are distinct properties with separate ownership: the bigger house is owned by a property trust, their old house that they kicked people out of so April could move in is owned by Nick and Kayla. But it's clear what they mean (though I've heard enough Nick cope to know this is fertile ground for his technicality bullshit).

In other words, yes, they want access to the April residence. They want to look through it and make sure it's not been turned into a drug den like the other house was. That means that they must have a decent understanding of the underlying situation since I highly doubt it it is standard practice to insist on visiting properties of which an individual is the landlord, even if they are geographically close.

What's really interesting is that the "both homes" language is only present for Nick and not Kayla.

What does that mean?

My guess is that at the very least that they are well aware of the polycule situation, that Nick and April have (or at least had) a sexual/romantic relationship, and that Nick has a greater degree of involvement in whatever is going on in the April residence.

The more interesting possibility is that they suspect that Nick is staying over at the April residence some or all of the time.

It's a very glaring distinction. From those two differing lines, it sounds as if in the event they turned up at the April residence and were refused entry, or they were granted entry and saw a huge pile of drugs out in the open or whatever, they would only hold it against Nick and not necessarily Kayla.
 
That motion is wild. It reads exactly like the list of demands your most entitled child hands you when he’s grounded. Just like that kid, Nick is making demands of the judge — having done zilch to make amends for his many errors — as if he has some leverage. It’s hilarious.
 
Oh? I didn't see that something new got released since he said he would stream w/ Barnes tonight. I know something came out yesterday or the day before but I thought that was before he said he was gonna stream w/ Barnes.

Nick claimed he was going to stream in a single Xeet that day, then did not.

He did so again today--allegedly wirh Barnes as a guest. LOCALS says Barnes said 'midnight'. Nor sure of that is Central or Eastern. Barnes and Viva are at the RNC, so what are the odds he gets busy and ghosts Nick for better company that could met more clout?
 
So it's now a pattern that when mn posts, nick bails. What exactly is he doing that he has to bail? He will still get the chat mocking him regardless if mn posts or not.

I can't imagine him calling the state workers of whatever department to Karen scream at them like he did during potentially criminals struggle session. The offices should be closed at these hours. Is he just... seething? In the shower? With no one to call? :story:
 
That motion is wild. It reads exactly like the list of demands your most entitled child hands you when he’s grounded. Just like that kid, Nick is making demands of the judge — having done zilch to make amends for his many errors — as if he has some leverage. It’s hilarious.
This is a Fatrick motion. Unbelievable.
 
1721191061552.png
Here we go.
 
So it's now a pattern that when mn posts, nick bails. What exactly is he doing that he has to bail? He will still get the chat mocking him regardless if mn posts or not.

I can't imagine him calling the state workers of whatever department to Karen scream at them like he did during potentially criminals struggle session. The offices should be closed at these hours. Is he just... seething? In the shower? With no one to call? :story:
I like to imagine that he and his Barnes-skinwalker of a lawyer get on a call and try desperately to find and dox MN but come to a dead end in their search each time
 
Nick always externalises his laziness and retardation. "... taking a semi-forced break..."
He will never admit that he is the root of all his problems.

If he was actually hood, he would be complaining that his 'fictitious' ops were preventing him from streaming.
 
Back
Top Bottom