💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
Oh I'm sorry, I didn't realize we're suddenly supposed to give the benefit of the doubt to the piece of shit swinger and his grooming friends who unapologetically broke his family apart over his cocaine addiction that he shared with his 9 year old.
You are nigger-brained if you think your emotional reaction justifies an accusation of pedophilia when there are scarce details indicating it. I'm completely willing to eat crow if the CPS investigation uncovers this kind of abuse, but that's the thing, I'd like professionals to find and test the facts and not some monkey on the internet.
 
Last edited:
Nick thinks he’s slick, but he isn’t. He’s so bad at hiding his degeneracy that random people on the internet can guess what he gets up to behind closed doors with pretty much dead accuracy. If Nick were molesting one of his kids, we’d be 99% sure of it and he’d be charged for it by now.
I mean without the leaked document we wouldn't have known he's giving his little daughter cocaine. Who can say they knew he was doing that? Probably nobody.
 
That "Pawverbs" book is the exact kind of book that church ladies love to gift to each other when they are trying to be thoughtful. It amuses me to imagine that Kayla got that book from one of her church friends when they heard she got a dog.
is that a children's book? Why would a grown woman read a book about christian dogs?
 
How much of each other do they end up seeing in the hot tub? The bedroom? When he’s slamming your wife? The shower and toilet? Seems like this would require more than just a normal hetero male tolerance for male nudity and sexual behavior.
Aaron said on the casino that he saw Nick naked post coital in the kitchen, they would stumble out into the kitchen after balldo bang sessions. That part really bothered me since not only were Nick's kids there but so were Aaron's. Actually now that I think about it, I would be hungry too if I had to risk seeing daddy naked to get to the food.
 
You must not have much personal experience with Christian housewives. I was homeschooled in a Christian homeschooling community, I do. This is exactly how they are.
White culture is sitting in your grandmas house surrounded by roughly five thousand LIVE LAUGH LOVE needlepoints.
Same thing with the books, it’s just what White women do.
 
is that a children's book? Why would a grown woman read a book about christian dogs?

In this case because her emotional relationship with the dog is probably the most healthy emotional relationship in that house. And because she is probably yearning for what christianity used to give her but has been removed from her life by the shift to degeneracy. Nick has nothing but contempt for her and has moved on. Aaron was likely incapable of any real relationship. Given the situation in the house her relations with the kids are probably awful.
 
What Kino Casino has said based on the clip I saw is that they got a DM from someone unnamed that something terrible is going to drop about Nick in the next few days. They didn't say that they had the info. They didn't say that they were dropping the info themselves.

So they are in a situation where they have promised nothing other than to take credit for something that potentially might happen that will be done by someone else. Given that they have committed to do nothing personally and its entirely vague what they are talking about, it doesn't seem to mean much.
I mean at this point they may just be playing the odds. I mean has a full week gone by without something even more terrible dropping? Ever since he donned the cursed idol?

At this point I'm leaning towards Cannibalism. Because why the fuck not?
 
White culture is sitting in your grandmas house surrounded by roughly five thousand LIVE LAUGH LOVE needlepoints.
Same thing with the books, it’s just what White women do.
They like cutesy stuff. Crazy, we need to get our most autistic Kiwis on the case to figure out this baffling enigma of why women like cutesy things.
 
He also said it's been the worst 7 years of his life, yet the same time last year he didn't have these junkie scabs. They only started showing up when he started hitting the hard drugs.
Hurr durr I got me some urticaria, and like drunkolepsy, I mean narcolepsy, plus I also got these, like, heat allergies which is why I lick dudes' ears in hot tubs, and oh I got ODD too. This nigga can't stop lying.
 
is that a children's book? Why would a grown woman read a book about christian dogs?
Older women who have children or grandchildren typically curve back to loving the things they loved in childhood because it helps them engage with kids better.
You must not have much personal experience with Christian housewives. I was homeschooled in a Christian homeschooling community, I do. This is exactly how they are.
Nah it’s just some weird nesting instinct women have. Asian, Hispanic, Indian, Inuit, and basically every ethnic group beyond American Blacks will do this shit.
 
How long does it take the cops to bring new charges? If they were planning to levy additional charges based on either the kid's drug test (if accurate) or anything worse they discovered at or close after the time of arrest, how long would that take? I know they like to get their ducks in a row before moving forward, the investigation against Balldo to begin with seems like it was done over several months before they actually moved to arrest and press charges.

I'm asking cause if we're already past the point of them bringing additional charges, we can probably rule out some of the greasier stuff at least for now. The kid's drug test might fall as evidence under the existing endangerment charges, I'm not sure though.
 
At this point I'm leaning towards Cannibalism. Because why the fuck not?

Tomorrow on the Steel Toe Morning Show.....

"There is alot of things I did with Nick I wasn't proud of. Yeah. I didn't want this to come out because its embarrassing to Kayla and the kids. But I went grave-robbing with Nick a few times. I also helped Nick steal an arm out of the hospital once. But I was never involved in preparing it or eating it. I asked Nick if this was risky behavior. What about diseases and what would happen if other people found out. Nick pointed me to a subreddit that said it was ok.
I had a heart to heart with Kayla about it and she said I needed to give it a try. Then there was that night when April and Nick went to the back rooms at pure pleasure. Kayla said they came back with alot of clothing stains and a man's body. I said I wanted nothing more to do with it. "
 
How long does it take the cops to bring new charges? If they were planning to levy additional charges based on either the kid's drug test (if accurate) or anything worse they discovered at or close after the time of arrest, how long would that take? I know they like to get their ducks in a row before moving forward, the investigation against Balldo to begin with seems like it was done over several months before they actually moved to arrest and press charges.

I'm asking cause if we're already past the point of them bringing additional charges, we can probably rule out some of the greasier stuff at least for now. The kid's drug test might fall as evidence under the existing endangerment charges, I'm not sure though.
The best person (or one of) to answer this question at this thread already addressed it here:
The most likely time for them to revise any charges is either right before or at the omnibus hearing.
The Omnibus hearing is scheduled to August 21, 2024
imagem_2024-06-24_183659816.png
Discuss the criminal case here: https://kiwifarms.st/threads/state-of-minnesota-v-nicholas-rekieta-kayla-rekieta.191978/
 
Last edited:
How long does it take the cops to bring new charges? If they were planning to levy additional charges based on either the kid's drug test (if accurate) or anything worse they discovered at or close after the time of arrest, how long would that take?
The cops don't bring charges, the prosecution does. And I think if they're planning on it we'll see at the omnibus hearing or thereabouts. There's really no deadline to bring charges, though if a case is already going to trial, they might just bring charges separately instead of resetting the original trial.

Any time enough information for more charges comes up, whether from the cops or elsewhere, they can bring charges in some way, shape, or form.
 
Shit, I didn't know that about the trust.
In this case, I don't know whether he specifically gets more money per kid but that's really common. The one thing we do knew he had five of them, and then did nothing but incessantly bitch and complain about what a burden they were. Multiple times he was pulled over by cops, he was literally bitching to the cops about his kids! That's how much he hates them.
Do we know the details on the trust? Would it be something like, if you have children you get more money since children cost money and the trust is for them, too? Or something?
No, we haven't seen it. Trusts are usually private unless they end up in courts or get named in legal documents. Privacy is part of the reason for them. You can structure trusts any way you like. The basic one is per capita where each named child living at the time of the death of the testator gets an equal share. However, if one of them dies, their kids get nothing.

Family trusts are usually meant to preserve generational wealth, from the children, siblings, spouses, others, to grandchildren, or even more distant relatives for really large ones. Those usually use something called per stirpes, meaning each child and their heirs gets an equal share, but if a child dies before the parent, their share goes to their children, the testator's grandchildren.

There are also so-called generation-skipping trusts, where one of the family members is a known fuckup. I'm pretty sure his family knows he's a fuckup at this point. There, you might base it entirely on the grandchildren and keep the fuckup in a spendthrift trust, which is a trust where the access to the money is strictly controlled to keep the fuckup from, well, fucking up.

It's pretty obvious from how Nick instantly turned into the stereotype of the trailer trash wigger who won the lottery the instant he got money entirely in his control. He'd never had real control over the money he was living on before.

So this is speculation but I think that while it's probably wrong here and there, his behavior is entirely consistent with the general gist of it.

I may be really bad on picking up on social cues though. Who knows?

@Balldo's Gate has done a lot more with the sparse information we actually do have, which is there actually is a family trust (probably more). One of his houses is owned by the "Robert Lord Family Trust," which may be something Nick set up himself to keep his name off his property and make it more difficult to dox. After all it's his middle name followed by "Lord." Sounds like the kind of dumbfuck shit he'd name it.
 
Last edited:
You have to keep the end of American Beauty in mind to understand Nick's point of view on this.

At the end of the film, the father is dead. His daughter despises him. His underage daughter is running away with the drug dealer who set the father up to die. She and the drug dealer are going off to live with his connections in the city. The father, as he is dying, thinks that this is fantastic. That his daughter has really proved to be a great person and is now set up for a great life.

You have to understand. At some very basic level Nick's dream for his children is probably that they become degenerate junkies and cam whores. To Nick, someone like Digibro or Riley represents some sort of ultimate freedom dream for his sons to aspire to. I don't think Nick could imagine a better future for his daughters than being pimped out in porn or becoming cam whores.

And if they hate him, so much the better. Because then they will not be in the way of Nick doing what he wants or taking up his time anymore.
I noticed this with a few libertarians who have kids. They all seem to want their kid to achieve this weird idea of "freedom"
 
Back
Top Bottom