🗑️ Trashfire MNPublicRecords CHIPS file on Rekieta's 9-year-old testing positive for cocaine - All parties are assumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MNPublicRecords

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jun 18, 2024
Featured on Jun 19, 2024 by Null: Nick Rekieta has confirmed the authenticity of a leaked juvenile court document stating that his 9-year-old daughter's hair tested positive for cocaine metabolites.
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
 

Attachments

MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
WTH.png
WTH!!!! IS THIS TRUE!??!?!

If this is true, I hate Nick and Kayla so fucking much. They deserve the rope. I feel sick.
 
MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
She didn't just test positive, but way hot. 500mg was the cutoff on that hair follicle test. Audryrose's level was over 5000. She just turned 9 years old last week, BTW.

Janny edit: The correct unit is pg/mg, picograms per miligram.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
Is that real? "tested positive for Cocaine at a level of over 5000 with a cutoff of 500." can anyone explain what that means besides the obvious?
 
Hmmm.... Well Nick did mention "having to keep an eye on a family member." Maybe the kid got into something they shouldn't.

This looks real bad. Caution is advised.
 
TurdThrower said:
Is that real? "tested positive for Cocaine at a level of over 5000 with a cutoff of 500." can anyone explain what that means besides the obvious?
Click to expand...


What it means is that the Rekietas aren't getting out from under the child abuse/endangerment charges. That kid, barely 9, tested positive for cocaine at 10x the cutoff level. 500pg/mg of hair is the cutoff level. Anything below that is considered a negative result for the purposes of the test. 500-2000pg indicates "low use" or "recreational use". 2000-10000pg indicates "medium use" or "daily/weekends". It's a hair follicle test so it's not like the kid just got into the coke stash one time and got messed up from playing around. Someone was dosing her with the stuff.
 
Last edited:
MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
Paging Robert Barnes about the constitutionality of your kids STEALING your coke.

feral cat #6385 said:
Hmmm.... Well Nick did mention "having to keep an eye on a family member." Maybe the kid got into something they shouldn't.

This looks real bad. Caution is advised.
Click to expand...
This dumb motherfucker is going to take all his balldo-washers down in one amazing move.
 
Mrsneksnekson said:
Is he even trying to hide the comparisons at this point?

View attachment 6101287View attachment 6101289
Click to expand...
That digital art of his face is laughably bad. Did he draw it himself?
MNPublicRecords said:
Interesting new matter of public record attached. Would anyone care to ask Nick's most ardent defenders why it was OK for a nine-year-old to test positive for cocaine?
Click to expand...
Interesting development right before his first real stream back. Should pair really well with his complete denial of endangering his kids.

Edit: @The I Scream Man I would assume if it was residue all the kids would have tested positive. Poor kid probably thought it was candy
 
If this is real, then good fucking job Nick. You're actively the reason why your children will be trapped in the Foster Care system.

1718760546156.png

chrome_sC5h0Wlyo7.png

Also I want to thank Ms. Sweep :story: for her hard work going through the home to help make this determination. Cope and seethe Nick, your house is a wreck.

chrome_7jUAdJC34X.png

chrome_w0OI98ln0Y.png
 
We now know whose coke it was. Nick is completely vindicated. That damn Kid needs to be locked up for 25 years. What a monster. That nine year old was sneaking out and buying 25g bags of cocaine for personal use and hiding it in Nick's safe.

I hope we hear from EVS and Barnes on this situation soon.
 
Obviously those fucking prudes at the church worked with the government to force one of Nick's kids to take cocaine. They had to assassinate the character of the biggest threat to their Scientology-like grip over rural Minnesota.
 
Lorne Armstrong said:

What it means is that the Rekietas aren't getting out from under the child abuse/endangerment charges.
Click to expand...
Wait am I reading this right? this is saying the 9-year-old's hair tested positive for cocaine at levels consistent with regular/daily use? and the other kids didn't?
How does that factor in with the assumption that she wasn't personally using (ie is it easy enough to just kinda pick up that material from living in the house with it, or does this indicate that she got into the coke pile?)
Father of the year, rackets. keep it up. proud of you.
 
Last edited:
what's the chance that they got the samples mixed up and the one that came back positive was actually nick or kayla?

i don't see how one kid would come back positive while all others are negative
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom