💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Captain Manning]

The new OP that is in PG can't be grafted onto this thread soon enough. Now is the time to do it. If it's only up to March or April right now, that's fine. It can be updated from here after the move. People are asking questions about old shit, and getting other things wrong. It's both frustrating and inflating the post count far more than necessary.

TUG divorced LolaMeatz?View attachment 6043923

I think it's technically an ongoing non-finalized divorce, but yeah.

 

[The-Patriarchy]

i'm baffled just thinking about what that caveat implies or is trying to do. i mean, for one thing, what in the fuck is a "legal statement"? it could be interpreted as a statement that one is legally allowed to make (as opposed to, e.g., an illegal statement); it could be a statement in the context of a law, or it could be---and i guess this is what he means---a statement that someone might interpret in a legal context. the big brain lawyer move i guess is to clarify that the statement is in fact a joke rather than a statement that might be used against him during his case. but like, if he takes things seriously enough to put that caveat anyway, then he would be serious enough to shut the fuck up. but if he's not seriously claiming that the statement is a joke, then the caveat is itself a joke, which in turn demonstrates his contempt for the whole process. i'm dizzy just thinking about how retarded he is.

The moronic thing is that it doesn't matter if it's a legal statement or not, it still can and will be used against him.

 

[Cynically Insane]

Did they confront him about any of their concerns? Probably not directly. I’d assume it was more suggestions like coming down to spend a month in Florida with the family.

It is my experience that when parents confront their adult children with an intervention for addictive behavior, the adult child threatens or does withhold access to the grandkids. Being completely cut out just makes the situation worse for everyone.

Spoiler: PL

My mom, (who has always been a meddling bitch), was very upset when I pulled my kids from public school. I am not a teacher, we pay the professionals, they will be illiterate, yada yada. When she started riding my ass about the curriculum, even threatening to report me for using Khan Academy for math, I told her to STFU or I would cut her out. It put her back in line pretty quick. She is still mad that I don't send my kids to the indoctrination factory but she is figuring out that public school isn't what it used be. When we saw a classroom of about 26 local students out walking on some sort of a field trip, I pointed out that there were only 2 white kids in the group. Her eyes have started to open. Point being, the threat of cutting off grandparents works as a last resort.

 

[Chazzed Up]

I see a lot of criticism of Kayla for her "role" in all this, but let's keep a reality check on what happened here, really. Nick and Kayla had a good marriage and a good family. It was Nick that went into the gutter of the Internet and once we was reprogrammed to think "yeah you know there really isn't anything wrong with foul language, aggressive postering, speaking 'my mind', sex and multiple partners and drugs", he then sought to bring her down to his level - all the while thinking this new thinking was actually elevated thinking.

This degraded behavior, amoral approach is merely the drug that is offered by the gutter of the Internet, and Nick got addicted and then he dragged her into it.

Like with all addictions, Nick had a good time, made money and this was "evidence" that the "new way of life" must be "OK and it is working", but like all cons, addictions etc. they always have short term gains, until eventually the behavior shows the true cost.

I blame Nick rightly for dragging his family down, he knew the immoral choices he was making and that they went against his own code of conduct, and did it anyways. A code of conduct is supposed to be the stop gap that prevents one from falling into these situations - it is not a measure of happiness, (i.e. happiness is not the indicator if a choice is right - the code is) because even if it feels good at the time, or seems beneficial, the code let's you know you have wandered.

These fools like Nick simply have no discipline. If they had discipline, they would not fall into these traps. Men easily fall into the lust and satisfaction of our primal urges, and Nick is no different from any man in this regard, where he differs is that he has no discipline.

I feel like debating about Kayla in this is kinda pointless other than to say she did not protect her kids which is true, if she and Nick had no kids we would have a lot less to talk about here and they could be junkie swingers in the gutter all they like and only be hurting themselves. Beyond the negligence and failure to parent, at least in the past months leading up to this, speculating on the specific mental illness or problems she has is, well, speculative.

Nick is the one we have volumes of evidence for being a disturbed, vindictive narc. And these personality traits existed before the alcohol. Nick was the 'Dr. Jekyll' narc before, the charismatic fun-loving guy with the ideal life. Being a narc, though, he could never quite be satisfied with what he had and needed to chase more highs, then the booze and drugs and 'Mr. Hyde' narc comes out, the one who will tear apart even his friends and family for daring to speak against him.

I have family connections to fathers like him and they ultimately never even wanted anything to do with their kids once the marriage fell apart. Mothers too, who are narcs. If Kayla is not as sick as he is, I just hope she can take care of her kids again and be clean. I know Nick can't and won't. And Kayla's actions aren't forgiven or minimized either, but I'd hope some love for those kids kicks in and the one parent who may want to still be in their lives can do right by them. But as of right now only one of those kids parents are online sperging at randos. It's not gonna be Nick.

 

[John Wicks taint]

She is released conditional bond according to MCRO. Nick paid for unconditional bond.

I guess we know who wants to try to clean up, and who wants to stay on a drug and alcohol fueled bender.

 

[Balldo's Gate]

One question you long term Balldo watchers might know. Does the family wealth come from the paternal or maternal side? The trust that owns their house doesn’t have the Rekita name, but another surname. I thought it might be the mother’s maiden name. It would make sense with Nick’s dad being an accomplished, upstanding business guy on his own. The type of guy a wealthy self-made man would want his daughter to marry. Just curious if Nick might have some of his weirdness about women due to his mother having outsize power due to her family having the wealth, not Dad’s.

Correct. It's the maternal side. Her maiden name is Owen, not Lord though.

The familial wealth came from an IPO windfall of a petroleum engineering company (Petrofac Limited) on the London Stock Exchange. This was in 2005, when Nick was 23 years old.

The US side of the company, which Nick's maternal grandfather Lou Owen worked for, had already been sold before Petrofac went public, for a tiny fraction of what the remaining company was later valued at.

From my reading of the grandfather's will (which is public now) it seems the bulk of the estate ultimately went into trusts in the names of his three children, including Nick's mother Celeste, in equal shares. The exact structures of these trusts are not known. In terms of the value of the shares, it was about $78.5 million as of 2005, which would be well clear of 9 figures with inflation, before even thinking of any investment returns in excess of inflation.

I posted about this and went into a lot more detail, but the TLDR using back-of-the-envelope math is that it wouldn't surprise me at all if Nick's parents were worth $20-$60 million just from their share of the grandfather's estate alone.

It certainly seems plausible that the value of the maternal grandfather's estate was $100-$200 million at the time of his death unless he was burning cash as much as Nick does (and, outside of charitable donations which could be tracked to some extent, he didn't seem the type to do so)

His dad definitely came up to check up on him and see wtf was going on with his own eyes. Remember the family trust owns the current home Nick and family live in.

It's the Robert Lord Property Trust. The structure of the trust or whether it owns anything else is unknown. Whether money is passed to the children via trusts or not is also unknown. Celeste created two Nevada LLCs using her initials and the initials of her children (COR-NRR LLC and COR-KMC LLC) in 2010,.

 

[Musashi's Son]

I think it's technically an ongoing non-finalized divorce, but yeah.

Bro how much material does TUG have for a rewritten OP? Noseguarding, blaming KF for Rekieta then goes to Metokur's chat, divorce etc.

 

[AN/ALR56]

It's funny how all this shit would immediately stop right now if he made a apology video, took a plea deal, and went to rehab to resurface in 6 months, everyone would forgive him, ignore the child neglect allegations, and only josh and us would be the ones still seething because of "muh kids mang" and be considered his a-logs.

But his ego won't fucking allow it, it's great

 

[Harm]

By adding disclaimers to some statements to specify that they're not "legal statements," does that create a reasonable impression that the remarks he makes without that disclaimer are "legal statements" then? I struggle to see how it makes any sense whatsoever, and therefore hope he continues to do it.

 

[RotPockets]

He's been addicted to porn since he was a teenager and he was a huge fan of the dick show before he even started streaming underwear parties in college

Might want to put a comma between “streaming” and “underwear”. It sounds like he was an aspiring voyeur pornographer. Not that I would put it past him.

 

[Space Pope]

I see a lot of criticism of Kayla for her "role" in all this, but let's keep a reality check on what happened here, really.

These fools like Nick simply have no discipline. If they had discipline, they would not fall into these traps. Men easily fall into the lust and satisfaction of our primal urges, and Nick is no different from any man in this regard, where he differs is that he has no discipline.

I don't disagree with your analysis of Nick but I do disagree with your take on Kayla being an innocent bystander victim. In this thread I have previously called out Nick's addiction to things such as pornography being a catalyst for his own spiral, so I certainly agree with your take about discipline and primal urges. While sayings like they enabled each other or it takes two to tango may seem like a cliched response, it is true in this case.

An effort post going through all the immoral and degenerate shit Kayla enabled and actively participated in going back years and years could be made, but I think anyone who has followed Nick and this thread already knows it.

 

[AnOminous]

In his sober moments, Nick has to know that what he said about Monty was clearcut defamation, and whether he wins or loses by the time this is over he will have shovelled an absolute fortune into the furnace, all because he was too fucking stupid to just say 'probably'.

There really aren't magic words that automatically make something not defamatory. The issue is how the audience would take it and if that's as a statement of fact, it's defamatory, whether you say "probably" or "allegedly" or "in Minecraft" or "abracabra."

 

[datura_binge]

Bro how much material does TUG have for a rewritten OP? Noseguarding, blaming KF for Rekieta then goes to Metokur's chat, divorce etc.

Is TUG defending Nick? Last stream I heard him on he was "trying to remain neutral" but basically said it really didn't look good...and that was before the most recent docs etc came out. He doesn't really seem to be on Nick's side at all other than saying they were friends and he wishes this hadn't happened and that he gets help. Did something else happen after that?

 

[Anticipointment]

i'm baffled just thinking about what that caveat implies or is trying to do. i mean, for one thing, what in the fuck is a "legal statement"? it could be interpreted as a statement that one is legally allowed to make (as opposed to, e.g., an illegal statement); it could be a statement in the context of a law, or it could be---and i guess this is what he means---a statement that someone might interpret in a legal context. the big brain lawyer move i guess is to clarify that the statement is in fact a joke rather than a statement that might be used against him during his case. but like, if he takes things seriously enough to put that caveat anyway, then he would be serious enough to shut the fuck up. but if he's not seriously claiming that the statement is a joke, then the caveat is itself a joke, which in turn demonstrates his contempt for the whole process. i'm dizzy just thinking about how retarded he is.

The moronic thing is that it doesn't matter if it's a legal statement or not, it still can and will be used against him.

By adding disclaimers to some statements to specify that they're not "legal statements," does that create a reasonable impression that the remarks he makes without that disclaimer are "legal statements" then? I struggle to see how it makes any sense whatsoever, and therefore hope he continues to do it.

About as effective as adding “in Minecraft” to a credible threat of violence.

 

[Chazzed Up]

I don't disagree with your analysis of Nick but I do disagree with your take on Kayla being an innocent bystander victim. In this thread I have previously called out Nick's addiction to things such as pornography being a catalyst for his own spiral, so I certainly agree with your take about discipline and primal urges. While sayings like they enabled each other or it takes two to tango may seem like a cliched response, it is true in this case.

An effort post going through all the immoral and degenerate shit Kayla enabled and actively participated in going back years and years could be made, but I think anyone who has followed Nick and this thread already knows it.

If she was enabling/following, that's precisely why I am at least for now holding out hope that getting away from Nick could benefit both Kayla and the kids (though at this stage she should not be near them imo). Better people than Kayla have followed a road to ruin with a narc. She seems like she was intended to be a trophy wife/brood mare, I don't get the impression they are or were deeply in love.

My opinions about this are more based on the insidiousness of narcs rather than the innocence of Kayla or women at large. If the nanny really was googling narcissistic abuse in relation to Nick, yikes. The only solution to dealing with them is going full no contact and that's not an easy thing to carry out if they're a family member or partner.

 

[Musashi's Son]

Did something else happen after that?

Not really, dude is just a hypocrite and a grifter. He and Megan Fox blamed KF for Nick's actions while he sat there and did nothing. All the while he was posting on twitter that Rekieta made him laugh and went to Metokur's chat when he went over the recent Rekieta happenings.

 

[Sharpeteer]

The Journey of Sir Balldolot
A Kiwi Farms Movie

This is a direct sequel to the Kiwinavian Prudes music video from last month. If you haven't seen it yet, I implore you to watch that before this one (but you don't really have to):

Sir Balldolot and the Kiwinavian Prudes
A Kiwi Farms Music Video

Sir Balldolot and The Kiwinavian Prudes 720p.mp4

This was a lot of work, and I know there will be some that may not like the direction, but that's understandable.

Either way, I hope you enjoy this.

 

[Captain Manning]

I feel like debating about Kayla in this is kinda pointless other than to say she did not protect her kids which is true, if she and Nick had no kids we would have a lot less to talk about here and they could be junkie swingers in the gutter all they like and only be hurting themselves. Beyond the negligence and failure to parent, at least in the past months leading up to this, speculating on the specific mental illness or problems she has is, well, speculative.

I have said it before, and I'll say it again: I am beyond done trying to figure out which of the two is responsible for what. As far as I'm concerned, they both suck.

Fortunately, I feel I don't need to figure anything out. Because this whole shitshow is now the subject of both a criminal and CPS investigation. Hopefully the people that get paid to look into the gaping maw of hell don't fuck it up, and the kids come out okay.

 

[Potatoherder]

Southern Law goes over the warrant's legality. tldr: he thinks it's legit but hedges by saying he is more in line with Joe feelings on Nick. Hopefully not when it comes to blaming the kids.

 

[dustnight]

It's funny how all this shit would immediately stop right now if he made a apology video, took a plea deal, and went to rehab to resurface in 6 months, everyone would forgive him, ignore the child neglect allegations, and only josh and us would be the ones still seething because of "muh kids mang" and be considered his a-logs.

But his ego won't fucking allow it, it's great

Don't listen to this prude incel Nick!