💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%

  • Total voters
    699
Does anyone else find it strange how many people ITT gargle PPPs balls? He's a fat retard like wut
I haven't watched Kino Casino before, but I noticed they tend to get some details wrong a lot of the time. I also will not forgive them for showing me that Uncivil clip that will haunt my nightmares from now on.
Apart from that, they seem okay.
So I've been thinking, If Nick's only vice (besides the odd drink) was his swinging/wife swapping do you think people would still go after him like we all have been doing? I guess I'm trying to figure out if there is an "allowable limit" one is allowed to have degeneracy wise until you become a lolcow.
Wouldn't have been remotely the disaster it is now. But still bad considering he went after hard against Jack Muprhy and role played as a trad dad for years.
 
He’s sloshed and he’s a goddamn moron if he thinks that anyone will tune in for ANYTHING ELSE THAN HIS CASE.

Sure, legally talking about it may not be a great idea. (Though let’s get real: Does anyone really think that he’ll somehow beat it? Doubt!)

So talking about it, or not talking about won’t really make a difference for Nick.

But talking about it absolutely WILL make people tune in.
I'm likely to tune in for five minutes to see what he looks like now/his speech patterns, then leave the rest of the streams for people more autistic than me to clip the embarrassing parts out of.
 
Absolutely.
Glimpse into the discourse going on right now in the alternate universe:
"It was to deal with the stress. It was to deal with the narcolepsy. I blame the Provigil acting as a gateway drug. It probably started just to help him try to keep up with that huge family. I understand how this could happen. I sympathize. There but for the grace of god go I."

You'd still have plenty of straight-edge CHADS who wouldn't go along with it, but he would be getting so much leeway right now.

“This is a wake up call and at least he’s taking responsibility to get it fixed, so he can be the husband and father he needs to be! I’m just happy it’s drugs and not a moral failing like having an affair!
 
“This is a wake up call and at least he’s taking responsibility to get it fixed, so he can be the husband and father he needs to be! I’m just happy it’s drugs and not a moral failing like having an affair!
"If he gets help, he can get sober again. I'm just glad that it wasn't something that you could never take back."
 
So I've been thinking, If Nick's only vice (besides the odd drink) was his swinging/wife swapping do you think people would still go after him like we all have been doing? I guess I'm trying to figure out if there is an "allowable limit" one is allowed to have degeneracy wise until you become a lolcow.
Some people will say no to coke but be ok with alcohol. Some people will be ok with coke and alcohol but have a hard no on wife swapping etc.
Different people have different hard stances when it comes to different types of degeneracy. So Nick would always get shit on by some people for some reason... it's just now that it's hard to find anyone who is ok with everything he was doing so everyone is basically united in their condemnation of Nick.

Now I guess even if someone is ok with alcohol they'll probably have "allowable limits", for example a few drinks are ok, coke stream levels not ok. Or even people ok with wife swapping might have a problem with doing it while the kids are in the house etc.

I wouldn't call it "allowable limit" but under different circumstances he'd definitely get a lot less hate.
 
You guys are retarded. The kid is not your average functional 16-year-old. It's a kid raised and home-schooled by Balldo and Cokewife. Nick is like 40 and can't take fucking care of himself. How do you expect a literal child half his age and half his DNA to be better?
 
I might have missed someone posting it but Nick liked Barnes tweet calling Sean potentially criminal a grifter. So I guess Nick is seething at Sean and legal mindset
 
I've heard about the paintings before and knew they were expensive, but holy fuck Nick, that's an absolutely retarded amount of money to spend on something useless
I remember him saying he has to go to semi-regular auctions and buy art as an appearance thing, it's classic new money cargo cult mentality. Nick knows rich people buy art but he doesn't know why, so he assumes it's just a ritual whose mere performance brings wealth and so he goes around to local gallery events buying uncertified bullshit by no-name nobodies for $30k a piece, then stacks them all in a corner of his basement.
 
So I've been thinking, If Nick's only vice (besides the odd drink) was his swinging/wife swapping do you think people would still go after him like we all have been doing? I guess I'm trying to figure out if there is an "allowable limit" one is allowed to have degeneracy wise until you become a lolcow.
I'm a really pretty sure nobody really cares about any of this except for how he treated his kids. It's fun to watch the guy fall because he is such a smug asshole, but it's absolutely not fun or okay to fuck up your kids lives. If all he was doing was a bunch of coke and liquor and whores, he wouldn't even be going to jail. His idiot ass didn't realize that there are ways to get a search warrant for your house that don't necessarily involve you personally, which is wild. Then again he's been playing fast and loose for a long while now.
 
You guys are retarded. The kid is not your average functional 16-year-old. It's a kid raised and home-schooled by Balldo and Cokewife. Nick is like 40 and can't take fucking care of himself. How do you expect a literal child half his age and half his DNA to be better?
Oh this is still going on. Yes it is absurd some are pondering why the 16 year old did not... there were two 40 year olds that did not. So don't be a retard.

*And one 30 year old. That is 110 years of adults right there.
 
Just had a thought. What if the reason he's been presumably kicked out the house to his other property by Lady Crackets in which he's making his studio is because he posted bail? Mandatory testing is a good way to keep someone on the straight and narrow, and Lady Crackets might have told him not to post bail because she wants him to get better. Post and leave, or don't post and stay with me.
That would also explain why she has no bail, she doesn't want bail.
 
Oh this is still going on. Yes it is absurd some are pondering why the 16 year old did not... there were two 40 year olds that did not. So don't be a retard.

The whole discussion is dumb and gay.

Yes, a 16 year old should be able to do basic chores etc.

Whose responsibility is it to raise the 16 year old to do that? That’s right… The parents. So we’re back to Rekieta being a failure of a parent.
 
Just had a thought. What if the reason he's been presumably kicked out the house to his other property by Lady Crackets in which he's making his studio is because he posted bail? Mandatory testing is a good way to keep someone on the straight and narrow, and Lady Crackets might have told him not to post bail because she wants him to get better. Post and leave, or don't post and stay with me.
That would also explain why she has no bail, she doesn't want bail.
I'd bet dollars to donuts she's in rehab, it's the obvious move and Nick's parents might even pay for it if her family can't; presumably they'd want *one* of their grandkid's parents sober and if she's in rehab there's no reason to pay the bail.
Since the trust owns the house and presumably Nick couldn't use it for collateral without their signoff, my guess is that they didn't want Nick's bail paid (otherwise they would have bonded him out immediately or sooner) and Nick had to use *his* property as collateral.
I'd also bet money one set of grandparents are living in the main house with the kids; that was what initially happened after the raid and if it was viable I would think CPS would prefer a solution that disrupts the children's lives as little as possible.
 
Nick has been a ghost channel for a while. He got a load of subs during Rittenhouse and Depp but when Nick turned into a fucking lush they stopped watching. Most of them were normies, theyre not online all the time, I doubt they bother to unsub, if you stop watching something long enough the algorithm stops showing you it anyway.
View attachment 6043175
I think you're right.

I have actually been mulling this over for a while now. Shouldn't his sub loss rate be way higher?

In the past, when you had scandals that exposed a Youtuber as a massive piece of shit, that was usually followed up with a mass exodus of subs.

Nick's YouTube subs have been steadily dropping, but they're not in absolute freefall like you've seen in other occasions

OTOH, he gets view numbers far less than one would expect from a channel with 447k subs.

I think the reason you're not seeing a high rate of sub loss with Nick is that most of his sub base is not actively following him anymore. They moved on a long time ago and didn't bother to unsubscribe.

The phenomenon of hemorrhaging subs occurs for those who are popular right up to the point they go completely off the rails. Whereas, Nick's content was boring barely watchable crap long before his arrest.

Hell, a lot of that 447k is probably oblivious to what happened last week.
 
Being bitchy on social media against everyone not balldoguarding is pretty mild for Nick standards.

He seems to think he was wronged and betrayed, which doesn't make me confident in his recovery from druggie wreck back to funny internet lawyer-man.
 
I hope (THIS IS A JOKE AND NOT A LEGAL STATEMENT) becomes a Rekieta-ism like that one copy and pasted message Patrick S Tomlinson sends everyone who texts him. Nick should also probably use that disclaimer whenever he says he loves his kids, just to be safe.
"My kids are important to me
(THIS IS A JOKE AND NOT A LEGAL STATEMENT) "
 
Back
Top Bottom