💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[UCantCCPMe]

It's been only 6 days since Rackets got out and already the street price of yayo in MN is seeing massive inflation from lack of supply. I'm not saying these things are connected but.....

 

[Procrastinhater]

Ok now lets compound that over years, like 5+ years. That's potential development issues.. Public schools would've done a better job than Nick and Kayla 100% AND wouldve fed the kids TWICE a day.

I know what you're saying but I wouldn't go that far. Public Schools are little more than Indoctrination Camps, especially in pozzed States like Minnesota, where they teach kids LGBTHIV+ degenerate shit, fetish lessons disguised as Sex Ed, bullshit like Troons are human etc.
Homeschools aren't bad, in fact if they were in Public School the kids would still be hungry and stinking, and Nick would still be getting away with it.
The fact it was a Faith Based Home School CoOp is what saved his kids, the other people noticed there was a problem.

Don't like degenerate fucks like the Balldo's give you a bad impression of Home Schools. Public School, even without pozzed Indoctrination bullshit, are overcrowded, understaffed, and underfunded, his kids could be coming in wearing rags and the only people who would care are the kids who bullied them.

 

[Catgirl Tyranid]

No, you’re so twisted up you think the problem is that the kids were neglected and the house was messy.

I had that shit in my life, and if cps took me I would’ve hated them forever.

The difference is because my dad had extra challenges instead of extra help, and he WASN’T A FUCKING COKEHEAD

That’s what’s so irritating about this angle. If you come by these details honestly, it’s nothing to break up a family over, and holy fuck, cps WOULD NOT remove kids on the basis of being hungry without being underweight and wearing clothes two days in a row. That’s just embarrassing, it’s not dangerous.

But a cokehead with guns is dangerous

I've fallen off whatever train of reasoning you're conducting or I missed it all together so let me formally state my thoughts:

- Kids raised by responsible parents, even in hard circumstances like yours, are certainly capable of becoming very self sufficient at early ages.

- Nick and Kayla are by definition NOT responsible parents and likely were barely sufficient parents before the substance abuse.

- CPS should NOT take their kids away if Nick and/or Kayla aren't coke fiends incapable of running their own household. CPS should always be a last resort and even then hopefully temporary.

- Nick sycophants are downplaying the neglect angle because it's the most salacious and damaging thing to Nick by blaming the kids for the state of the household for which the responsibility lies wholly on Nick and Kayla's shoulders.

- Their words mean nothing to the court case, but everything to the eldest son who is either wrestling with the guilt of reporting his parents to their pastor which led to them getting arrested or the guilt of having not done so and feeling ashamed he didn't do more to save his siblings and I hope to God he's off the internet and not watching this shit flinging taking place.

- For this reason alone, the people arguing that Nick's kids SPECIFICALLY should have magically stepped up when their parents decided being a parent was lame and for prude losers should be pilloried and pelted with rotten fruit in real life.

Edit:

Can there be a Rekieta Childcare Sperging containment thread now please.

Seconded, this argument is all over the fucking place and probably not productive.

 

[SargonF00t]

The two oldest children appear in a video and they are very thin. The younger boy is absurdly smaller than his age mates. This can happen by chance or genetics or medical reasons but it’s pretty striking.

In school performances last year and the year before C. R. was small but less thin. Also he was cast as a fork. A fork. My dude. Solidarity; I was “cast” as a maple leaf once.

With the Rekieta's losing their minds, it makes me wonder if they had engaged in some Ruby Franke inspired child raising techniques in the last year or so?

 

[Not A Bug]

What if the youngest accidentally gets exposed to the coke? I have no problem imagining a 6 year old finding some white residue on some surface and licking it or smelling it. Do you know how fucked up that is? Any one of those children, but especially the ones 12 and under could have very easily have OD, dosages are weight based, and the average 6 year old is only 50 pounds!

So fucking dangerous

When I was four, I found my dad's parts cleaning jar with gasoline, thought it looked like honey and to a swig, albeit not for long. Wait, come to think of it, that explains a lot in my life.

 

[The Wokest]

What if the youngest accidentally gets exposed to the coke? I have no problem imagining a 6 year old finding some white residue on some surface and licking it or smelling it.

Oh yeah? Well MAYBE a little coke booster is what the irresponsible and lazy 6 year old needed to start picking up after herself, change her clothes and take showers alone.

 

[Gas Station Nachos]

Another irritating thing with the Good Lawgic/Chrissie Mayr stream is that he keeps making a distinction between 'moral' concerns and child safety concerns. I.e. he keeps saying that Nick and Kayla's relationship with Aaron and April is merely a moral concern, not a child safety one. But is there really a distinction? If the Rekietas start swinging and taking huge amounts of booze and coke, both of which are visible from Nick's streams, the odds off the kids being neglected go up drastically. The distinction between moral and child safety concerns is a false one.

 

[Captain Manning]

You'd think a fancy shmancy lawyer might at least be passingly familiar with the concept of constructive possession: https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/supreme-court/1975/44633-1.html

I was thinking of the same thing.

Does Joe even do criminal law? Because Sean does, and he went over constructive possession on his show the other day.

I don't think "I swear to God, it's not my shit officer" really works very often.

I think it would be great if we see Lawtube on Lawtube action here. Lawtube IBS even. I could imagine Sean schooling Joe on constructive possession, and then Joe is reduced to a crying wreck, blubbering about how Nick taught him how to fish in his pond

 

[DumbDude43]

Homeschools aren't bad, in fact if they were in Public School the kids would still be hungry and stinking, and Nick would still be getting away with it.
The fact it was a Faith Based Home School CoOp is what saved his kids, the other people noticed there was a problem.

it depends on your area
in some places, going to public school would have gotten the kids first hand experience with drugs, crime, and sexual depravity long before daddy nicky got all that shit going at home

 

[Young_Griff]

Has any distinction been made between nose guarding and baldo washing? Seems so far the terms have been used interchangeably.

I'd offer that nose guarding is skirting around the issue- we don't know the actual state of the house, we don't know the actual state of the kids, we don't know what was going on with the drugs, we don't know what was going on with Aaron and April. Everything is just speculation and we have no hard evidence or facts truly established yet.

As opposed to baldo washing- Everything out there is a lie, Nick is being targeted by the government and the judge and the police, it's all a conspiracy, the kids could wash themselves and cook and clean, those damn church people are in on the govt. conspiracy because Nick dared to live a little, the Farms did this, etc.

At this point the majority are balldo washing as opposed to Nose Guarding by your definitions from what little I have seen.

 

[Strix454]

Nick sycophants are downplaying the neglect angle because it's the most salacious and damaging thing to Nick

For some of them, it also seems to be about legally going after the search warrant. The theory goes that if there is no neglect, the search warrant is invalid and therefore Nick goes free on the drug charges. Nick's position communicated through his stooges is that there was no neglect at all.

 

[Terrorist]

This is something I haven't seen many people talk about but keeping large quantities of drugs in your house is extremely risky. Not only from the obvious legal issues, but there are criminals out there who literally make a living off of stealing from dealers and high quantity users. This generally happens in a smash and grab style raid on the property, and they're often extremely violent.

Nick would actually have been a pretty good target for this, he lives in a rural area, his property is somewhat isolated and can't be seen easily from either the road or his neighbours, and Nick himself is an upper-middle class trust fund kid who's too strung up most of the time to properly aim a gun, or really do anything to defend himself. Had word gotten out in Minneapolis that the Rekieta's were moving large quantities of gear it wouldn't have taken much for someone with very ill intent to track him down, and God knows what could have happened then.

Spoiler: Powerlevel

Had distant criminal relatives that would pull shit like this, also knew someone that got seriously fucked up in a drug raid carried out by dissident Republicans (Irish, not American), cause they had a lot of gear stashed at their gaff

All the lolbertarian GUBMINT CONSPIRACY shit will become really funny if Nick the Narc ends up ratting out some Somalian dealer to the feds for a better deal. Dax will certainly be breathing heavy if that happens.

 

[Young_Griff]

On the issue of young children and hygiene/bathing.

I've got kids and I would expect a child to bathe themselves even at 6 BUT never without some supervision. For starters, a bathroom can be a dangerous place, you can slip and hurt yourself. There's potentially medication kept there and of cause you can drown. Secondly, kids can make an ungodly mess. They can turn a bathroom into a swimming pool, use every towel and still be soaking wet. Thirdly, kids can just not wash properly.

The issue of supervision has no one size all solution. To quote Sargon, "it depends on the child". At 6 my kids where washing themselves but we ran the bath the door was always open and we always stayed around to make sure everything was okay. Now I don't live in a mansion so my bathroom isn't far away but in Nick's house, well anything could happen. I mean we are supposed to believe that the Rekieta's and Imholte's did coke, ket and had all kinds of sex without the kids knowing.

As for the house, kids make a mess but do you know who else does? Junkies. Are we supposed to expect the older kids and the 16 year old specifically to sweep it up for young children and 4 crackheads?

This right here should be the end of the fucking argument in relation to the kids and wether they can look after themselves.

/thread

 

[CeilingTile47]

I was thinking of the same thing.

Does Joe even do criminal law? Because Sean does, and he went over constructive possession on his show the other day.

I don't think "I swear to God, it's not my shit officer" really works very often.

I think it would be great if we see Lawtube on Lawtube action here. Lawtube IBS even. I could imagine Sean schooling Joe on constructive possession, and then Joe is reduced to a crying wreck, blubbering about how Nick taught him how to fish in his pond

No, Joe is basically a debt collector. Not sure if he's still active in the industry, but he used to buy up judgements that were very unlikely to ever be collected on, for pennies on the dollar, then work the systems to try and collect.

 

[The Wokest]

it depends on your area
in some places, going to public school would have gotten the kids first hand experience with drugs, crime, and sexual depravity long before daddy nicky got all that shit going at home

Yeah and I get that some people fear the gay satanic public school system.
Watching some of the teachers that libsofTikTok features it seems more of a troonification camp than a school at times.

But in this case... I'm willing to take a chance and say public school would've been better for the kids than whatever Nick subjected them to.
The motherfucker had enough money to send them all to a private school too if he was so afraid of the homosexualization machine that is the public system, Hell as far as I understand 1 of the kids was going to a private school.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Could the kids step up somewhat? Yes, and they probably did. None are dead, after all.

Did Nick do every possible bad thing he could have? No, as the kids are still alive.

Should Nick have gotten away with what he did because his kids stepped up and ran the whole damn house sitcom-style? Hellsnah.

Shit, parents get noticed by other adults when taking care of kids (sick or otherwise) impacts them. Expecting a 16 year old to not only run an entire house alone, but do it so well nobody notices, ah hell no.

Heck, even if he did become Mr Nanny Poppins and do everything perfectly the CPS would still have been called once the parish noticed that all the kids talk about how X is taking care of them always.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

For some of them, it also seems to be about legally going after the search warrant. The theory goes that if there is no neglect, the search warrant is invalid and therefore Nick goes free on the drug charges. Nick's position communicated through his stooges is that there was no neglect at all.

That's a theory with no basis in law. Also the search warrant was for drugs. They expected to find drugs. They found drugs.

 

[Aquilla]

Just watched a Balldo "demonstration" video, and all I have to ask is, "WHY?"

 

[VaraeIon115]

Other people ITT have said it, but I'm pretty sure the pro-Nick crowd is trying the shift the zeitgeist onto "them damn keedz!" to take the heat of Nick himself. I've seen the bullshit morph from "The eldest should've taken control of a 9 person household" to "the 6 year old shoulda pulled up" and it's starting to get fucking ridiculous now. I'm sure this is just an attempt to blow smoke up everyone's ass and isn't a serious argument anymore. These losers are grasping at straws.

 

[Procrastinhater]

At this point the majority are balldo washing as opposed to Nose Guarding by your definitions from what little I have seen.

Going by those definitions, the Nose Guards (people like Legal Mindset and Uncivil Law) seem to be more and more backing away and trying to reverse course as more comes out about Nicks shame, the Balldowashers are doubling down, even when it's now making them look bad too.