💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 170 24.3%

  • Total voters
    700
Could be AR15 .223 casings as they are ".22" caliber.
No generally cops don't make that kind of mistake. It is likely a .22 caliber ar-15 a.k.a. the little girl AR
Screenshot from 2024-05-28 10-11-41.png
 
A small town cop putting this much effort into investigating, what has to be, a local celebrity is slightly sus. Particularly if the investigation started prior to the complaint being made.
Never underestimate the tenacity of a bored, small-town cop. I had a traffic stop turn into a multiple hour long ordeal once that ended up with them telling me to just drive slower and no ticket or infraction.
 
My favorite part was that Rackets hits his head like retard when he isn't getting his way.
It sounds funny on the surface, but self harm and threats of self harm are a common manipulation tactic in abusive relationships. In the context of the situation, I'm pretty sure Nick was just hurting himself (but not too much because he didn't really mean it) to inflict emotional distress on the other people there.

There are too many new pages, I can't tell if someone else already responded to this.
 
I'm just going to say this:

I was in a similar situation(minus guns and alcohol) 15 years ago. I never got a drug charge, but coke was very much involved. We were just out when the cops showed up. I thought the knock on the door was the person coming back with more. My kids went to foster care. I got charged with two count of child neglect. I got two years of probation. My family has been back together for 14 years. I haven't used any substances since.

This is reality of what Nick is looking at just with CPS (this is what I had to do to reclaim my life):

Random drug screens
Two psychological evaluations
Drug rehab classes(I had 4 hours a day, 5 days a week)
Parenting classes
Domestic violence classes
Seeing children 1 time a week
Stable housing and job for 6 months
6 months of having to open door any and everytime someone on case knocks on door after getting kids home.
Therapy for parents and kids.

These conditions weren't only for CPS. They also were attached to the child neglect charges.

Kayla has options to keep the kids around her throughout this. She proves she is clean and CPS is likely to allow her to live with her parents. She wouldn't be allow to be unsupervised with the kids. I mean if she went to help a child in the bathroom one of the grandparents would have to go in there, too.

The biggest question that determines success is whether Nick and Kayla remembers life off substances. In my experience with everyone who did any of the classes with me, the only ones that were successful was the ones that only had a short drug history. They are doomed if they can't still identify with life before substances.

I believe Nick has a chance. I see the coke as the easier thing to end. The alcohol is so intertwined into his online identity that I don't see how streaming and ending drinking will work.

Nick and Kayla have each other as stumbling blocks. It isn't unusual for one parent to try and the other not to care.

The one thing that is going to give Nick or Kayla no chance is all the talk online. NICK if you are reading this forum STOP! Everyone can say what they want, but you need to seek people who will encourage you. I know you don't feel comfortable with leaning on the church. People will have opinions! Stay in a close-knit group that are supportive of you reclaiming your life. ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY! I promise CPS is more likely to give your kids back if you accept your fuck up, and straighten up. I seen it constantly people wanting to claim they didn't do anything wrong. Why would they give your kids back if you don't see you did anything wrong? THEY AREN'T!!! Also, DON'T violate the court orders with visitation. I seen more than once children removed from family for allowing visitation against court orders. This is YOUR time to get your shit straight.

I know people might flip out on me, but everyone can kiss my ass. I got my kids, stayed of substances for last 14 years, and have successfully kept my stuff straight.
 
To quote my dad: “The only kids that go hungry are those with evil parents.”

You don't let your kids go hungry. YOU skip a meal if money is tight. You forego some earthly pleasures so they can eat. If you can't buy food, you are broke, grab your rifle (which Nick had) and shoot a deer. Point is, there is always a way to make sure your kids are fed.
I’m quoting these here because this is more about Nick’s character as a parent than his court case.

Growing up, both my parents worked and my dad regularly worked upwards of three jobs at a time. If I or any of my siblings were to go hungry, it would be because both of my parents were long dead. We’re literally in a time when a sign of poverty is obesity rather than starvation; there’s no excuse to let your kids go hungry when living in the US.

That being said: Nick and Kayla have zero financial hardships that would lead to their kids going hungry at all. These claims, which I believe come from a sincere concern rather than some sort of small-town reputation assassination, outline a knowing and willing dismissal for the well-being of their children, by both Nick and Kayla. This should burned any goodwill from all observers with even a mediocre bullshit detector.
 
Needle users are the most hardcore drug users, that's something that takes time...people don't start shooting up to begin with. Injecting coke is said to be even more intense of a high than crack but I have no intentions of finding out first-hand.

How long has this actually been going on?
I don’t believe Nick was shooting coke. He’d have more than a “few marks” and they would have found evidence at the house. Cocaine injection is the worst of the worst. He probably had marks from his arm from picking at them - which is very, very common with stimulant abuse. Picking at face, arms or legs becomes a compulsion thanks to stimulant abuse.

Needle exchange programs keep these scary horse size syringes for the cocaine IV users because coke IV is so bad they need deep vein needles within months. Unlike heroin cocaine uses shoot up constantly on binges (dope heads pass out) and blow out all their veins in months with all the nasty shit coke is cut with. It’s worse than meth because meth users don’t need to get high every twenty minutes.

Anyway Nick spiral was bad but I think it was just snorting coke and drinking.
 
There isn't a "machine gun ban". There is a requirement that you not be a broke nigger and that you get a Federal Firearms License.
There are no new registrations. You can buy one from the pool of machine guns that have existed since 1987 (and a couple of reclassifications since) but there are no more. It's a ban in very slow motion.
 
View attachment 6029430

They're doubling down on this (stolen from @Barry McKockner in the criminal case thread).
>cops only investigation was to watch social media, listen to gossip, and isolated video
social media is a great source of information when the subject of your investigation routinely incriminates himself there.
gossip.. well it kind of stops being gossip when people make an actual police report based on first hand observations.
isolated video? there's dozens if not hundreds of other videos where he is just as drunk and delusional, just a bit less agitated.

plus i know this is probably not legally sound, but the facts on the ground that the cops found in the house kind of proved it all right.
if they had searched the house and came out empty handed (no drugs and no april) then these arguments about the search being unjustified would find a lot more sympathy - but with the way things are, all the 'gossip' about sex and drugs and child neglect turned out to be 100% true and correct, so making the argument that the search should not have been done just makes you look like a callous contrarian.
 
Back
Top Bottom