Culture Google's AI is teaching Pokemon fans a thing or two about LGBT pocket pals - Bulbasaur is a "plant-loving queer," Mewtwo is an "older, cultured gay," and oh so much more

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Link (Archive)

Google's AI is teaching Pokemon fans a thing or two about LGBT pocket pals - Bulbasaur is a "plant-loving queer," Mewtwo is an "older, cultured gay," and oh so much more​

Google's recent AI Overview rollout is leading to some illuminating revelations for everyone's favorite TV shows and games, like Pokemon.

If the goings-on of search isn't your scene, Google recently rolled out a new feature that leans on AI to answer your search query. While it can regurgitate a lot of content from outlets seeking to answer those same questions, it hasn't quite got the hang of scraping a Reddit post or satire article and separating fact from meme.

The result? Some oddball moments, like seemingly recommending using non-toxic glue to stop cheese flying off pizza because some scholar called Fucksmith on Reddit said so.

It's not just pizza fans who are getting goofy results, though, as Pokemon fans have been learning new things about their favorite series. One fan shares that Google's AI Overview told them there are no LGBT characters in the Pokemon Horizons series, but the rest of the franchise?
5F1F76D5-6BF6-4097-9009-0538850CC840.jpeg 36CA5201-7BB3-4851-AC23-627C14C5C37E.jpeg
Apparently, "some people" say that Bulbasaur is a "plant-loving queer who often says 'Mother Earth,'" Butterfree is a "strong trans woman who helps the player's team early in the game," and Ditto is a "genderqueer, gender nonconforming sibling who has escaped the gender binary."

"Some people" would be Out Magazine, which wrote an article called "21 Pokémon who are totally, absolutely, definitely queer" earlier this year. I ain't here to disagree. We searched for something similar on Google and got different results that were pulled from the same article – shoutout to Mewtwo; "an older, cultured gay."

That's not the only Pokemon-related search term that Google's AI Overview seems to be struggling with. Another fan shares that looking up gym leaders isn't going great either - that, or I wasn't paying attention to Batman and Spider-Man's runout in Generation 6. Our search for that one was cleaner, in fairness, though I don't think Apex Legend's Wattson is quite the right answer I was hoping for, either.

While Google's AI Overview spent some time in beta, its global rollout is still in its infancy, so you'd imagine these sorts of things will clear up in time. Until then, we've always got Mario Kart.
8A32A6DA-415B-49C2-BE30-80DB4AAB8AB5.jpeg 5AA55476-CC59-460D-86C1-F2FEDD788C4E.jpeg
Ah.
 
I wouldn't put it past companies like Google to put hard coded rules forcing their AI to really scour the bottom of the barrel just to generate an bias confirming response for a question relating to LGBT stuff. Because nothing would be worse than making these people feel invalidated if it said "sorry. There are no LGBTWTF characters in your favourite franchise no matter how autistic your fan theory may be." Or "sorry. According to reality, chopping your dick off and calling yourself Samantha does not in fact make you a woman"

Google is already trying to 'fix' the issue of their shitty AI hallucinating all the time by manually removing these results. But I've noticed that all these AI powered search tools (from Bing to Brave and everything in between) will just randomly hallucinate and just make up shit. Bing is pretty good when the question is fairly generic but for anything more obscure it'll lose track quickly.

But AI being retarded has been the case since the start of all this and it's unlikely to ever be improved. It's not really as advanced as these companies want you to think and it'll only get more restrictive (and less fun) as time goes on. These companies have broke their AI by trying to keep it safe and completely abandoned the idea of AI being useful by hard coding biases and restrictions in the first place.

TLDR: Google is retarded anyway. Try to generate something funny before they make it completely unusable for anything other than repeating the first blurb of any article on the first page of a google search.
 
Oh how I wish this meant the retards are gonna get sued by TCPi, but I know they won't.
 
I wouldn't put it past companies like Google to put hard coded rules forcing their AI to really scour the bottom of the barrel just to generate an bias confirming response for a question relating to LGBT stuff. Because nothing would be worse than making these people feel invalidated if it said "sorry. There are no LGBTWTF characters in your favourite franchise no matter how autistic your fan theory may be." Or "sorry. According to reality, chopping your dick off and calling yourself Samantha does not in fact make you a woman"

Google is already trying to 'fix' the issue of their shitty AI hallucinating all the time by manually removing these results. But I've noticed that all these AI powered search tools (from Bing to Brave and everything in between) will just randomly hallucinate and just make up shit. Bing is pretty good when the question is fairly generic but for anything more obscure it'll lose track quickly.

But AI being retarded has been the case since the start of all this and it's unlikely to ever be improved. It's not really as advanced as these companies want you to think and it'll only get more restrictive (and less fun) as time goes on. These companies have broke their AI by trying to keep it safe and completely abandoned the idea of AI being useful by hard coding biases and restrictions in the first place.

TLDR: Google is retarded anyway. Try to generate something funny before they make it completely unusable for anything other than repeating the first blurb of any article on the first page of a google search.
I've said it before, this branch of research is a dead end. LLMs will never be cognizant in the same way Clippy never will be.
 
They're a bunch of fantastical, animal-like creatures created by a Japanese man based on his passion for insect collecting as a kid. That's it.
 
Hey. Remember when someone made the over 9000 genderspecial shit making fun of Tumblr? Looks like we've hit the point where that is now the unironic truth.
 
Google is already trying to 'fix' the issue of their shitty AI hallucinating all the time by manually removing these results. But I've noticed that all these AI powered search tools (from Bing to Brave and everything in between) will just randomly hallucinate and just make up shit. Bing is pretty good when the question is fairly generic but for anything more obscure it'll lose track quickly.
i hate tech companies shoving ai into places where it doesnt need to be
it has a lot of promise but its being used as just a gimmick like with The Cloud™
These companies have broke their AI by trying to keep it safe and completely abandoned the idea of AI being useful by hard coding biases and restrictions in the first place.
to be fair to google, you are able to disable all restrictions with gemini in google ai studio
 
It's pretty amusing seeing Google get buttfucked by ai so much. Couldn't happen to a nicer company.
 
Remember when Google gave you results and didn't create them out of thin air for you?

Anyway, I use Yandex. It's pretty accurate as of now.
 
> Remove all aspects of human-designed algorithms and curation from your search product
> Roll out a new feature using unsupervised learning methods
> Massively overfit so it quotes the most ridiculous posts from anywhere deep on the internet to a casual searcher
> Have to fix everything by adding a shitload of rules by hand, like not to put glue on pizza
Funny stuff
 
Remember a time when Google was just a search engine, and not a literal propaganda machine?

Kiwi Farms remembers.
 
>Google AI spits out misinformation
>"where is all this crazy misinformation coming from? We need to block the source"
>Source is all mainstream publications and their friends in the media
 
In one of the screencaps in the OP, there's the claim that Yoshi is a "tender non-binary lesbian", but the Super Mario Wiki says something somewhat different.

Despite his egg-laying abilities, Yoshi is considered male in most regions. However, Shigeru Miyamoto has gone on record and stated he is not sure if Yoshi is male or female.[23] It could be that Yoshi does not officially have an assigned gender, as the original Japanese does not use gender pronouns. However, on several occasions that he has dialogue, such as his rescue in Super Mario World and the story mode of Mario Party 3, he uses the masculine pronoun ぼく (boku) in the Japanese versions.​

- Yoshi - Super Mario Wiki, the Mario encyclopedia

(BTW boku is boyish but sometimes gals use it)
 
AI is the devil and we need the government to ban it in all it's facets and anything made with AI is unethical and must be destroyed! It's making everything worse

*AI says Bulbasaur is gay*

*Smug chuckles* um, look here, chudderinos. The AI says Mewtwo is trans, it can't be wrong.
 
Back
Top Bottom