Official Kiwifarms Edgy Atheist Thread - where we make fun of all sorts of sky daddy believers

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

which ones are the worst?

  • christards

  • muzzies

  • foreskin munchers

  • pagans

  • cow worshippers

  • self-hating atheists ("I rEsPeCt ReLiGiOuS pEoPlE")

  • other

Results are only viewable after voting.
I was a christian. Believed in God. One day I was in church and the pastor said "God created everything" and I smiled, for I believed.

Then I thought "If God created everything... then he created niggers, too!"
So now I'm an atheist.
 
Tablet County said:
I can. People have irrational beliefs, it's simply easier to have them. There are times I still knock on wood when I think of some misfortune, even if my mammal brain knows that it's useless to do so, it soothes my repitle brain.
Click to expand...
My qualms always been with karma. It's something I've seen a lot of atheists go into depths and defend. While "what comes around goes around" sounds logical. It's not. There's no reason what you do will come back to bite you. Fate and destiny are not real. They aren't Santa Claus and discriminate accordingly. Either you get away with it or you don't.
 
Astro Loafo said:
My qualms always been with karma. It's something I've seen a lot of atheists go into depths and defend. While "what comes around goes around" sounds logical. It's not. There's no reason what you do will come back to bite you. Fate and destiny are not real. They aren't Santa Claus and discriminate accordingly. Either you get away with it or you don't.
Click to expand...
Same thing. It's easier to accept that bad deeds don't go unpunished than come to terms with the fact that bad deeds go unpunished more often than not.
 
Astro Loafo said:
My qualms always been with karma. It's something I've seen a lot of atheists go into depths and defend. While "what comes around goes around" sounds logical. It's not. There's no reason what you do will come back to bite you. Fate and destiny are not real. They aren't Santa Claus and discriminate accordingly. Either you get away with it or you don't.
Click to expand...
Wexner will be arrested any day now and people will stop buying Victoria’s Secret, it's divine justice aka universal Karama.
Click to expand...
Is easier on the mind than reality.
 
Odd Opossum said:
A Christian/Muslim alliance is memeshit made up by dorks online, almost entirely just to fantasize about how they're totally going to kill gays and trannies.
Click to expand...

Bacha bazi - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

You might not think that a Christianity/Islam alliance should or could happen, but the people with the power to make it happen sure think it's a swell idea.
 
The Tall Man said:

Bacha bazi - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

You might not think that a Christianity/Islam alliance should or could happen, but the people with the power to make it happen sure think it's a swell idea.
Click to expand...
This is just yet another example of the heads of Christianity being absolute cuckolds to a more dominant religion. I guess Putin wants to throw more Chechens at Ukraine in the coming months so he's buttering them up accordingly.
 
QE65 said:
This is just yet another example of the heads of Christianity being absolute cuckolds to a more dominant religion.
Click to expand...
Absolutely.
The same goes for Islam, they like to pretend that they are strong, but all their leaders suck kosher cock. From Saudi Arabia to Isis they are also just a bunch of dirt grovelers.
QE65 said:
I guess Putin wants to throw more Chechens at Ukraine in the coming months so he's buttering them up accordingly.
Click to expand...
People like him because he shits on neocons and NATO, but he is horrible for Russia and the West.
The enemy of your enemy is another enemy. -Sun Tzu

Putin is full on melting pot and a Shabbos goy if not a crypto.
 
Lt. H. DuBois said:
When I was a kid in the early 2000s, the atheist angle was on the rise with comedians like Ricky Gervais and Bill Mahr, who were lauded for their biting critiques of organized religion. Same with Christopher Hitchens, he might be the ultimate edgy atheist kingpin.
Fuck I still will occasionally watch his appearances on Firing Line, or that Cyprus documentary he did in the late 80s. But rarely the religious stuff, as it always just seemed to be punching down to me. I feel like the society of the past few years has been swinging the different direction, edgy atheists are considered fringe weirdos and the based keking Christion men are all the rage now.
I feel this is mainly as a reaction to what many people would have considered the rapidly changing norms and morals of society, and this retreat into religious conservatism is an attempt to wait out this storm. But at least for me the pendulum is swinging the other way again, when I see teenagers unironically saying Christ is Kang or whenever some retard on this site goes "Literally demons", I can't help but wince. Like so many trends in history it's all cyclical and in another 5 years the athests will be the hip thing again
Click to expand...
There are legitimate reasons to be concerned about a rise in extremist movements, the growth of the angry under-sexed, under/unemployed male demographic is fertile soil for various sorts of lunatics to plant their proverbial seeds.

However, the modern state has tremendous resources available to it to buy off the aforementioned demographic with things like legal/subsidized prostitutes, surrogate partner therapy being covered by various health plans, and similar things like those. This means that only a small number of die-hard lunatics would be left to populate these groups, and they won't have much in the way of reach or power.
 
>What retirement? In the future we will all become immortal. 😊
I don't think a lot of people want to work all their life, even if they'll feel like they're just 40 when their actual age is 400-500. I definitely wouldn't work for so long.

>This may be a hot take, but edgy atheism never left to begin with. When the online movement was in its infancy, atheism still carried a lot of social stigma. That's why the edgy atheists were so angry and radical. You don't see much of that anymore, not because the movement fell off, but because it was successful. >Nowadays, you can openly be an atheist in developed nations at zero social cost. Employment, dating, social circles - none of your prospects are hampered. The typical reaction to atheism 20 years ago was "What?! You don't believe in gAwD?!", whereas today, it's "Oh, okay cool".
It stopped being hip and cool and shocking to throw jabs at organized religion and the religious and a good chunk of edgy atheist people moved onto something else. A lot of SocJust left and Dissident Right/Neo-Reactionary/Online Western Right types are still against religion, it's that owning da Christcucks/Christchuds isn't the first priority on their lists. Obviously edgy atheism is still here, online and offline, but you won't be seen as a rebellious free thinking revolutionary if you are one, so teenagers don't pick a fedora now (at least in the developed world).

>I don't know any atheists who are that autistic about cleansing society, but if they are, they should also give up on anything remotely associated with Greek, Norse, Japanese, and Egyptian mythology (no more anime and video games for you, buddy).
>Don't get me wrong, I'm one of those people myself and I want atheists to be a lot more hostile towards religion. Just not necessarily in a juvenile, "burn everything down" kind of way that ends up implicating all of human history.
>Although I will say that communities are something I'd be highly wary of. Not in the atheists-enjoying-Christmas sense,
Then it was just a specific sort of edgy atheists/anti-theists that I keep bumping into, but they either had mental issues, trauma due to abuse from their religious family or they picked up retarded politics which included "Kill religitards, behead religitards, karate chop religitards in half, if something is even remotely associated with belief, destroy it, consequences and second-hand opinions be damned".
 
@Dasjas Watanid Tabas You can reply to parts of a post by selecting it and then hitting the reply button that shows up. Repeat with different sections if need be.

Dasjas Watanid Tabas said:
It stopped being hip and cool and shocking to throw jabs at organized religion and the religious and a good chunk of edgy atheist people moved onto something else. A lot of SocJust left and Dissident Right/Neo-Reactionary/Online Western Right types are still against religion, it's that owning da Christcucks/Christchuds isn't the first priority on their lists. Obviously edgy atheism is still here, online and offline, but you won't be seen as a rebellious free thinking revolutionary if you are one, so teenagers don't pick a fedora now (at least in the developed world).
Click to expand...
It's not hip and cool anymore because being an atheist is completely normal now, which is good. I'm not interested in being a rebellious hipster, I want good ideas to spread and become normalized.

Different topic:



This shit is so funny man, there are so many parallels between Hindutva and white nationalists it's fucking unreal. :story:
Full video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kfu8Q61cPkg ("The End of Hinduism" lmfao)
You're not going to find anywhere safe anymore. You're finished. At best you'll eke out a pathetic existence like Zoroastrians do - 30, 40k people/communities in different parts of the world - and in the end, you will be a glorious chapter of history and nothing more, probably not even that.
Click to expand...

सब खत्म हो गया (it's over) >: (
 
The Deep State said:
This so funny man, there are so many parallels between Hindutva and white nationalists it's fucking unreal. :story:
Click to expand...
It's funny how this is almost never mentioned or acknowledged. Supremacism amongst Hindu's and Arabs is so malignant that you get people positively frothing at the mouth when their 'side' is slighted by a perceived inferior. This is playing out right now in the Israel-Gaza war. Mass protests and unrest across the West unlike anything we have seen for Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, Myanmar, the Kurds, the Uyghurs, or the Yazidis women and girls. It's just somehow that much worse for them when the Jews are involved.
 
QE65 said:
It's funny how this is almost never mentioned or acknowledged. Supremacism amongst Hindu's and Arabs is so malignant that you get people positively frothing at the mouth when their 'side' is slighted by a perceived inferior. This is playing out right now in the Israel-Gaza war. Mass protests and unrest across the West unlike anything we have seen for Ukraine, Syria, Yemen, Myanmar, the Kurds, the Uyghurs, or the Yazidis women and girls. It's just somehow that much worse for them when the Jews are involved.
Click to expand...
To be fair, Hindutva (i.e the "alt-right" of Hinduism) hasn't really done anything yet. "Love Jihad" is more or less their version of white genocide because rape, violence, abductions, and forced conversions of Hindu women (and other non-Muslim women) by Muslim men is a serious issue in the subcontinent, alongside Islamic terrorism/crime in general; 26/11 (2008 Mumbai terror incident) is basically India's 9/11. Like clockwork, Muslims cannot coexist peacefully with anyone.

When Hindutva gets brought up in the west, they're usually compared to white supremacists for the cardinal sin of being anti-Islam - thus being denied a spot in the oppression totem pole. Funny enough, Muzzies win again, just like they do on the subject of Israel/Palestine. I can sympathize with Hindutva bros in spite of their hubris, just like how mass immigration, 13/50, and anti-white messaging in western media warrant valid concerns even if 99% of white nationalists are basement mongoloids. I just thought the scathing monologue from Abhijit (the guy talking in the video) was really funny regardless, mirroring the doomerism of the alt/dissident right.

As for Israel/Palestine, I've only really pondered why it's a volatile issue compared to China/Uyghurs and Myanmar/Rohingyas. The reason I'm discounting all the other conflicts is because they don't involve Muslims losing to non-Muslims, so they're not pressing the same buttons. The most I can figure out regarding Israel/China/Myanmar is this:
1) If there's one thing Muslim nations fear more than Allah, it's the CCP. Pakistan, Bangladesh, Iran, etc. are terrified of China and are eager to sweep for them. I remember reading about Saudi Arabia happily accepting organs harvested from Uyghurs because they're "halal" organs (lol wtf). And unlike Israel, the CCP is not a "civilized" enemy that you can protest or guilt-trip effectively; they simply don't give a shit.
2) I doubt most people are aware that Myanmar exists.
3) Israel vs Palestine involves an ideological hatred of Jews shared nearly by all Muslims, and a struggle for the 3rd holiest site in Islam (Jerusalem). It's an ancient blood feud Muslims are autistic about, including the diaspora. When the diaspora loses their shit, their libtard dhimmis follow suit.

I've been meaning to do a deep dive on the Rohingyas for a while, but this is all I have for now:
EXOwPOFUEAAWFi3.png

Sound familiar? For all the horrible stuff I've heard coming out of Myanmar and China, I have no doubt the Chinese and the Burmese chimped out in the first place because of all the usual shenanigans from Muslims.

edit: typos
 
Last edited:
The Deep State said:
What retirement? In the future we will all become immortal. 😊
Click to expand...
I honestly have no idea if you're trolling here or not, but immortality is not in the cards, medically speaking. What is, though, is anti-aging medicine of various kinds. These various treatments, therapies, medications, etc will extend the quality and quantity of human life by a couple hundred years or so, and instead of dying of old age people will die of some cause unrelated to old age.

Also, I find it difficult to imagine people working forever regardless, like @Dasjas Watanid Tabas mentioned in his post. At some point most people will have enough of their surplus money conservatively invested that they will either retire and live off the passive income, or take some sort of part-time and/or volunteer work.
 
Some people are starting to wake up to the realities of the Sharia. I've seen a few discussions of the core texts in this area. By all means, let's allow this pearl of ancient wisdom to run in parallel to the rule of law in Western society.
 
QE65 said:
Some people are starting to wake up to the realities of the Sharia. I've seen a few discussions of the core texts in this area. By all means, let's allow this pearl of ancient wisdom to run in parallel to the rule of law in Western society.
CuKsKLc2GiKc2Jjy.mp4
Click to expand...
Sanhedrin 55b
A girl who is three years and one day old whose father arranged her betrothal is betrothed with intercourse, as the legal status of intercourse with her is that of full-fledged intercourse. And in a case where the childless husband of a girl who is three years and one day old dies, if his brother, the yavam, engages in intercourse with her, he acquires her as his wife; and if she is married, a man other than her husband is liable for engaging in intercourse with her due to the prohibition of intercourse with a married woman.
Click to expand...
With regard to a boy who is nine years and one day old, whose brother died childless, and who engaged in intercourse with his yevama, his brother’s widow, the status of the intercourse is that of full-fledged intercourse and he has acquired her as his wife, but if he chooses to end the marriage, he cannot give her a bill of divorce until he reaches majority. And he becomes ritually impure like a menstruating woman after engaging in intercourse with her, and then renders all the items designated for lying beneath him impure like the items designated for lying above him.
Click to expand...
Avodah Zarah 36b
With regard to a male gentile child, from when, i.e., from what age, does he impart ritual impurity as one who experiences ziva? And Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi said to me: From when he is one day old. And when I came to Rabbi Ḥiyya, he said to me: From when he is nine years and one day old.
Click to expand...
Sotah 26b
Rava of Parzakya said to Rav Ashi: From where is this matter that the Sages stated derived, that licentiousness does not apply with regard to an animal? Rav Ashi replied that it is as it is written: “You shall not bring the hire of a harlot, or the price of a dog, into the house of the Lord your God for any vow; for both of them are an abomination to the Lord your God” ( Deuteronomy 23:19). This verse prohibits one from sacrificing an animal that served as payment to a prostitute or as payment for the purchase of a dog. And it is taught in a mishna (Temura 30a): In the converse cases, the hire of a dog, i.e., a kosher animal that was given to the owner of a dog as payment for engaging in intercourse with it, and the price of a prostitute, i.e., a kosher animal which served as payment in the purchase of a maidservant acquired for prostitution, are permitted to be sacrificed, as it is stated in the aforementioned verse: For both of them. This term indicates that only those two animals may not be sacrificed, i.e., those which served as the hire of a harlot and as the price of a dog; and not four animals, as the reverse cases are excluded from this halakha. This indicates that the concept of licentiousness does not apply with regard to animals, as the payment for intercourse with a dog is not considered payment for prostitution.
Click to expand...

Why are Jews and Muslims shocked that people are anti-Semitic?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom