💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 277 39.7%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.5%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    698
945664765.jpg
 
Boingboingboingboi said:
the bigger question is what was on the search warrant. kurt made this point last night and i think it's solid (regardless of whatever else people feel about him).

i think it's safe to assume that they had a warrant to knock down the door and look for drugs, but if there's any defending nick at this point, that's the point in the process that needs to be scrutinized. how did this turn from a child endangerment case into a drug bust? what was on that search warrant and what was the probable cause?
Click to expand...
I really doubt this will be an issue given that the "child endangerment" issue was almost certainly tied up with the drugs. Probable cause isn't that hard of a bar to clear. Kid coming clean to the mandatory reporter about how fucked up mom and dad are and that there's drugs all over the place (maybe crackmom DID clean up somewhat before the door got knocked down) is the simplest answer.

I think lawtube is just hoping this is going to end up being some dramatic trial with every step being questioned and challenged. I doubt that will happen.
 
Not Who You Think said:
Technically, there is no indication of when Nick was informed of or otherwise shown a search warrant.
Click to expand...
I don't know why people are stating it as a fact that they kicked the door in before Nick got to the house.
It doesn't say that on the report.
From the report we don't know when Nick was shown the warrant, if the door was through by then or not.
 
Apteryx Owenii said:
the police being able to lie is not the same as faking or pretending to have a warrant to gain entry, which they cannot legally do. They also can't command someone to do something and then claim a consent search (i.e. if they actually order someone to open a door, they need the same legal authority as if they kicked it in).
Click to expand...
There is a wide gulf between what police are allowed to do on paper and what they actually do in the moment.

Apteryx Owenii said:
Nick knew damn well that they had a warrant
Click to expand...
I agree it's likely that he was told they had a warrant during his traffic stop. It does not seem as though he was shown the warrant during his traffic stop. There is a difference.

My entire point is that we don't have a firm grasp of the first few minutes of the search warrant. There are any number of appropriate reasons to shit on Nick and Kayla -neglected children, bumping coke, driving drunk, squallid house- and I'm right there with you for all of them. The forced door entry is the one area where, with the few details we have, I think the cops potentially acted improperly.
 

Attachments

  • 1716682005201.png
    1716682005201.png
    114.7 KB · Views: 15
What do you reckon the odds are on the oldest of the Rekieta kids watching this thread? At least occasionally?

If that was me, I wouldn’t want to, but prob couldn’t resist.

Probably started back in the day before all the degeneracy when Nick still had fans here: “Oh wow, look at all these internet people talking nice things about papa! Cool!”
 
JOSH MOON TOTALLY FELTED! JIM GOT THE BODY CAM FROM A FOIA!

Edit- God damn it, Jim.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom