💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%
  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.7%
  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%
  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 170 24.3%

  • Total voters
    700
Has anyone posted this yet? Apparently it was his pastor:
Archive
GOX6d2MXUAE_osk.jpg
 
Possibly. But such negotiations should not be done by the defendant. Part of the reason why its said a Lawyer should never represent themselves is because it gives them the right to refuse with no repercussions. If they hire a defense Attorney who goes to the State and says "You got us, but, I don't think you have us on X. You only got us on the lesser Y. Therefore, lets save everyone the trouble. My client will plead to Y if you drop X. Besides, he's a member of the bar. He has a family. He owns property. This is his first offense. He's SORRY. Lets convict him of Y, give him probation and he swears he won't drink, do drugs, or own guns again. This will fix the issues, everyone is happy and the State doesn't have to pay for housing him for the next 25 years, or figure out what to do with his kids,. Everyone wins, the guilty parties are punished and social catharsis is achieved!

This is not possible if Rekieta represents himself. Because there is no stand off. The Defense Attorney does not get to go back to the Defendant and regail them of the awesome deal they just scored and how they can restore societies faith in the legal system if they just accept. If there is no stand off there is no acceptance. There is only the State and the Defendant. You think it should not matter and on paper it should not.

But make no mistake it matters. If Rekieta represents himself the State has no reason to offer a deal. Because to offer a deal would be to acquiesce to the criminal. Who they have dead to rights. Rather then their attorney by proxy.

The psychological difference makes ALL the difference.
Thank you for the thoughful reply. (edit) Missed the last part. That's helpful.

Dead to rights?
 
Well I mean we are just seeing a small piece. The actual full picture might be much much worse.
That's actually my bet as to why he broke rule #1 (don't talk to the police) to make sure that April would not get implicated. She has been living with the Rekietas for months now and has no doubt seen a whole lot more illegal activity. The worst case scenario for Rekieta would have been her taking a deal in exchange for testimony, and then opening a whole bunch more cans of worms regarding illegal conduct.

Now the prosecutors have no leverage over April, so she has no incentive to talk to them (and a lot of incentive not to, if she was involved in that illegal conduct in any capacity).
 
So when you consider what Monty is suing Nick over; you ask Nick, he downplays it as "Oh, and I said something like 'Monty allegedly liked sucking little boy penis.'"
I mean the thing is, while what he said is legally actionable, it's not that far off from the sentiment people would have held about him before all of this. Montagraph was getting dunked on by Rekieta and Jim because he was a larping weirdo with delusions of grandeur about his influence, while making weird short films about him torturing and raping teenage girls or whatever. Obviously this isn't to excuse Nick, he should have known better to throw an "allegedly" in front of whatever shit talk he had for Monty at the time, and ultimately that's why nobody's really on his side here.

But that doesn't make Monty any less of a creepy pervey weirdo just based off what we know about him.
 
i guess, yeah
i'm not really convinced he was actually cooking up rocks in his fucking bedroom, but i don't see any other explanation for why the hell there would be cocaine residue on a pan either.
If the house was as filthy and dusty as the report described then maybe it was the only clear surface they could make lines on.
 
Now, I'm sure we can all agree that the SMART thing for Rackets to do now would be to go radio silent for awhile. No streams, no tweets, nothing. He already put out his brief statement acknowledging (in a completely idiotic way) the current events, so the SMART thing to do is to shut up so as to not provide additional ammunition to interested parties within the state machine.

Which is why I fully expect him to stream tonight or tomorrow night, acting like a complete douche... Remember to smile REALLY big for the camera, Nicky! Gotta leave a good impression for those jurors who're going to be seeing this evidence -- er, I mean, this example of bravery you're putting forward for the world to see and to put the haters to shame!
I think even ethan ralph at this point would give one of his fake apologies "I messed up and hurt the people I love"

even ethan ralph isn't this brazen we could probably write psych papers on this :story:
 
Bruh why is he worried about doing a damn show. His fucking update isn't even apologizing to his family nor his fans. Fuck him.
Buddy, he has NOTHING to apologize for! If they hadn't been squirted out of his wife's now-ruined body, he wouldn't have to deal with the bullshit of being responsible in a family household, nor would he have to drunkenly drive them to social activities or church. No church, no report from the pastor. As you can see this is clearly the FAULT of his family and THEY should be apologizing to him!
 
Because he is a coward and a pussy. Throwing it to the ground.
He should have shown he was a real man, protecting his castle and took a swing at the cop. Like Fatrick did on video once.

Be better Nick, next time show them who is the man.
I'm actually rather astonished that he didn't go all retard chimp on the cops. I credit that to some brilliant police actions that caught him unawares up the block and had him cuffed and compliant before he knew what was happening.
 
I REPEAT HE LEARNED FUCKING NOTHING.

How? How does one get to this level of ego and pride and delusion?
Get raised as a trust fund kid with ODD (read: you're a little arrogant shit and your parents don't beat it out of you properly) and reach your 40s lucking into a huge house, a pretty wife, 5 kids, and one of the cushiest jobs imaginable: He was being paid to stream about the career/job he didn't do but loved enough to get a doctorate in and the same things we talk about for free.

ONE TIME of a 8-16 year old Nick getting the smirk slapped off his face by someone and being forced to eat shit "despite" it being THE Nick Rekieta would have saved him. But no one did it.

It is indeed late.
Eric July even offered to pay for his rehab too on twitter. And Dick Masterson being the piece of shit he is mocked it.
It would be very nice to see Dick and Eric start going at it. I can't stand either of them so whoever loses, we win.
 
I assume he refused to share the door code because he didn't get a copy of the search warrant until the cops drove him back to the house.
That had been my assumption when first reading the report as written.

What I found interesting is this part:
Upon knocking on the door, a juvenile female opened the door and wouldn’t let them in. NICHOLAS REKEITA would not provide the door code to enter the residence. Law enforcement entered the home utilizing a door ram.

Upon entry, law enforcement located KAYLA REKEITA [...]

NICHOLAS REKEITA returned to the home with law enforcement. He demanded a copy of search warrant. When given a copy, he looked at it and threw it on the ground.
The probable cause sheet says the warrant was executed at 9:13am, and that Nick verifiably wasn't home.

It would probably take around 10 minutes for the officer that pulled Nick over to get him back to the house. It doesn't seem like he was handcuffed away from the house (though the "with law enforcement" line could be a euphamism saying exactly that) and there's no mention of failing to comply with an instruction to get back to the house. Once there Nick tossed aside the warrant that he had just demanded to see, but being a petty bitch in the face of a legal warrant isn't illegal. What's more important is that there's no mention of Nick (or anyone else) attempting to stop the execution of the warrant.

The booking info shows that April was the first of the 3 adults checked into custody, at 10:03am. That's 50 minutes from the start of the search warrant to the actual booking.

Google Maps says it's an 11 minute joyride from Nick's house to the jail:
1716597632391.png

There's probably a 20-30 minute window where Nick is actually at the house, with full understanding of the situation, complying.

Given all of this, it SOUNDS like the local PD rushed to break down the door before announcing to his wife that they had a warrant, or in allowing Nick to have eyes on the document. Heavy emphasis on "SOUNDS like" (because who knows what really went on) but it does appear to be corroborated by the timestamps that we know of.

The police's description does not suggest they even tried to provide the warrant prior to forced entry, only that the minor child wouldn't let the officers in. On the other hand, there's nothing that suggests the presence of an immediate danger that couldn't have waited for Nick to drive 3 blocks back home to see the warrant.

Nick and Kayla are dumb fucks for doing drugs around their kids and for needlessly living in squalor but, to me, it also seems like the cops went heavy handed when Nick et al was actually cooperating in the legal sense. Depending on local laws (and how it actually played out) this could be legally relevant. I'm really curious to see the bodycam footage.
 
Back
Top Bottom