Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Greer v. Moon 2:20-cv-00647 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:20-cv-00647
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Sep 15, 2020
  • Terminated
    Apr 22, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Aug 6, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
Joshua Moon, Kiwi Farms, Lolcow, LLC, Russell G. Greer

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Aug 6, 2024 Case no longer referred to Magistrate Judge Jared C. Bennett. (kpf)
113 May 15, 2024 ORDER of USCA Supreme Court Circuit as to 45 Notice of Appeal, filed by Russell G. Greer. Supreme Court order dated 05/13/2024 denying certiorari. (jrj) (Entered: 05/16/2024)
112 Apr 28, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Floridia via electronic given case number 3:24-cv-00122-MCR-ZCB. (nl) (Entered: 04/29/2024)
111 Apr 25, 2024 Report on the Final Decision of an action mailed to the Register of Copyrights Office. (kpf) (Additional attachment(s) added on 4/26/2024: # 1 Copy Right Form) (kpf). (Entered: 04/26/2024) PDF
110 Apr 25, 2024 NOTICE OF TRANSMITTAL that case has been transferred to Northern District of Florida. (kpf) (Entered: 04/26/2024)

Greer v. Moon 21-4128 — Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

  • Docket No.
    21-4128
  • Court
    Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • Filed
    Oct 26, 2021
  • Nature of Suit
    3820 Copyright
  • Last Filing
    Oct 15, 2023

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 11)

# Date Description Filing
10010936535 Oct 15, 2023 Case termination for opinion
10010794067 Jan 5, 2023 [10967591] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Joshua Moon. Served on 01/06/2023. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GGS [Entered: 01/06/2023 12:15 PM]
10010791785 Jan 2, 2023 [10966429] Order filed by Clerk of the Court denying Appellees’ Motion to Waive Oral Argument. The oral argument set for January 18, 2023 in Denver, Colorado remains set as scheduled. Counsel for Defendants - Appellees shall file a calendar acknowledgment form by January 5, 2023. Served on 01/03/2023. [21-4128] [Entered: 01/03/2023 10:16 AM]
10010776728 Dec 1, 2022 [10959168] Response filed by Russell G. Greer to Appellees' Motion to Waive Oral Argument. Served on 12/02/2022. Manner of Service: email. This pleading complies with all required privacy and virus certifications: Yes. [21-4128] AG [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:34 AM]
10010776140 Nov 30, 2022 [10958830] Calendar Acknowledgment Form filed by Russell G. Greer. Served on 12/01/2022. Manner of Service: email. [21-4128] GWK [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:49 AM]

GREER v. MOON 3:24-cv-00122 — District Court, N.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    3:24-cv-00122
  • Court
    District Court, N.D. Florida
  • Filed
    Mar 19, 2024
  • Terminated
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    None
  • Last Filing
    Oct 16, 2024

Parties (4)

Parties
RUSSELL G GREER, JOSHUA MOON, LOLCOW LLC, KIWI FARMS

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 30)

# Date Description Filing
Oct 16, 2024 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ZACHARY C BOLITHO notified that action is needed Re: 132 Mail Returned. (mah)
132 Oct 15, 2024 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Russell G. Greer re: 128 ORDER. Order mailed to 1155 S. Twain Avenue, Suite 108420, Las Vegas, NV 89169. (Attachment: #1 Notice of Returned Mail). (mah) (Entered: 10/17/2024) PDF
131 Jul 10, 2024 AO 121 Copyright Case Notification of order entered. Copy sent to the Register of Copyrights. U.S. Copyright Office, 101 Independence Ave. S.E., Washington, D.C. 20559-6000. (adf) (Entered: 07/11/2024) PDF
130 Jun 10, 2024 ACKNOWLEDGMENT re 129 Case Transferred Out to Another District. Case transferred from Florida Northern has been opened in District of Utah as case 2:24cv00421, filed 06/11/2024. (jfj) (Entered: 06/13/2024) PDF
129 Jun 10, 2024 Interdistrict Transfer to the District of Utah. (jfj) (Entered: 06/11/2024)

Greer v. Moon 2:24-cv-00421 — District Court, D. Utah

  • Docket No.
    2:24-cv-00421
  • Court
    District Court, D. Utah
  • Filed
    Jun 10, 2024
  • Nature of Suit
    820 Copyright
  • Cause
    17:0501 Copyright Infringement
  • Jurisdiction
    Federal Question
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    Apr 27, 2026

Parties (4)

Parties
Russell G. Greer, Lolcow LLC, Kiwi Farms, Joshua Moon

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 50)

# Date Description Filing
473 Apr 27, 2026 RESPONSE re 468 Objection to Magistrate Judge Decision 460 to District Court filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/28/2026) 1
472 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 465 Response re 462 Order filed by Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
471 Apr 14, 2026 MEMORANDUM in Opposition re 469 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and Memorandum in Support; MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted filed by Plaintiff Russell G. Greer. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026) 1
470 Apr 13, 2026 Modification of Docket re 469 MOTION to Strike : Error: The document is requesting two possible reliefs. An event should be chosen for each relief filer is requesting, including motions in the alternative. Correction: MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted added to the entry. No further action is needed. (alf) (Entered: 04/15/2026)
469 Apr 13, 2026 MOTION to Strike 464 Answer to Counterclaim and alternative MOTION to deem factual allegations admitted and Memorandum in Support filed by Defendants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon, Counter Claimants Lolcow LLC, Joshua Moon. Motions referred to Jared C. Bennett.(Hardin, Matthew). Added MOTION on 4/15/2026 (alf). (Entered: 04/14/2026) 1
The description showing on CourtListener is just one word. I think the court staff have given up trying to describe this bullshit.

giveup.png


I would die laughing if the court says "Granted in part and denied in part. The 3-20-24 order is "Vacste" [vacated], the case will proceed in the District of Utah, however new deadlines will not be set and the court finds Plaintiff Greer has failed to litigate. Case dismissed."
Unless I misunderstand the rules, Utah can't do anything now, it's Florida's problem.

Russell might as well be screaming into an empty garbage can.
 
The description showing on CourtListener is just one word. I think the court staff have given up trying to describe this bullshit.
Courtlistener descriptions are written by their AI or whatever, and not the actual court staff.
 
View attachment 5851471
As a non-lawyer. I'm pretty sure the court has free reign when one party doesn't respond within it's powers. If he would have written any argument about this motion, this would have been prevented.
View attachment 5851469
:story: this wasn't some crazy legal argument Hardin made for moving venue. All you had to do is make a simple motion, but your laziness and ignoring the court handed him a massive W. Good luck on getting those copyright lawyers to pick up your case for free again on appeal.
This mongoloid doesn't realize his 10th circuit "win" wasn't a win it was just a reopening.

He really is litigating "take down my thread" and he is so bad at it. He doesn't understand that originally he lost so hard the court didn't even consider his arguments, just that he's a fucking retard. The appeal court said "actually, he's really retarded, give him a break" and then he completely fucked it up and fumbled the ball.

Amusingly enough he makes Hardin's argument for him by arguing why the 11th should ignore the batshit insane 10th.
 
Ok, Civil Procedure is not really something I know anything about and I am sure there are others that are much more knowledgable about that but there is one thing that keeps bothering me about the latest Russ filings. He keeps going on about motions he can make to try and overturn a judgmennt, the moving of the procedure does not constitute a judgment as far as I understand, therefore none of the motions he is submitting amount to anything I would think. Is there any actual recourse he would have in this context? Also is there any possibility that the court would respond to his filings if only to say that he is wrong?
 
The description showing on CourtListener is just one word. I think the court staff have given up trying to describe this bullshit.

View attachment 5851640



Unless I misunderstand the rules, Utah can't do anything now, it's Florida's problem.

Russell might as well be screaming into an empty garbage can.
CourtListener can't even spell Vacste right, what's wrong with them...

And yeah, I don't expect that anything will come from the Utah docket past the order to change venue, and I understand that he's technically shouting into the void right now... but this is a lolsuit. Sometimes in lolsuits the void shouts back.
 
Ok, Civil Procedure is not really something I know anything about and I am sure there are others that are much more knowledgable about that but there is one thing that keeps bothering me about the latest Russ filings. He keeps going on about motions he can make to try and overturn a judgmennt, the moving of the procedure does not constitute a judgment as far as I understand, therefore none of the motions he is submitting amount to anything I would think. Is there any actual recourse he would have in this context? Also is there any possibility that the court would respond to his filings if only to say that he is wrong?
I think he actually knows that, Russ is a bit smarter than he plays sometimes. I also think he knows he's fucked in florida and so he's hanging on to the tiniest bit of hope that lightning will strike twice (he really never should have been given that 10th circuit "win" as it has totally fucked his lolsuit skills).

A competent lawyer might be able to make an argument to bring the case back to Utah (or Nevada?) but it would be something like "this fucker just hired me, we all know this is bullshit, do me a solid" and Hardin might not even object too strenuously. But I suspect that is still highly unlikely just because courts don't like being fucked around with.
 
Just curious, but is there any chance that the Utah courts will get pissed off enough about Greer's continuing to waste their time with his screeching into the void that they'll do SOMETHING to bitch-slap that tard? I realize that I have a better chance winning the lottery 20 times in a row than for anything like that to occur, but...
 
Is there any actual recourse he would have in this context?
Appeal to the 10th. Literally the only thing he can do, and he would lose that.
Just curious, but is there any chance that the Utah courts will get pissed off enough about Greer's continuing to waste their time with his screeching into the void that they'll do SOMETHING to bitch-slap that tard?
I don't believe so
 
CourtListener can't even spell Vacste right, what's wrong with them...

And yeah, I don't expect that anything will come from the Utah docket past the order to change venue, and I understand that he's technically shouting into the void right now... but this is a lolsuit. Sometimes in lolsuits the void shouts back.
Could the Utah court send Greer a response saying that the move is done and cannot be changed so please stop sending motions to us it's getting annoying?
 
I asked Copilot
If a case has been transferred to a different court, it’s crucial to follow the correct legal procedures. Continuing to send motions to the old court after the case has been moved can lead to complications. Here are some potential outcomes:

Ineffective Motions:
The old court may consider your motions ineffective since they no longer have jurisdiction over the case.
Your motions might not be reviewed or acted upon, leading to delays or misunderstandings.
Dismissal or Sanctions:
If you persistently send motions to the old court despite the case being transferred, the court may dismiss your motions or impose sanctions.
Sanctions could include fines, penalties, or other consequences for violating court rules.
Lack of Progress:
Continuing to send motions to the old court can hinder the case’s progress.
The new court may not be aware of your motions, and important deadlines or hearings could be missed.
Communication with the New Court:
Notify the new court promptly about the case transfer.
File any necessary motions or pleadings with the new court, following their procedures.
Remember, legal matters are complex, and it’s essential to seek professional advice. Consult with an attorney or the court clerk to ensure you handle the case appropriately. 📜👩‍⚖️
 
Anyway, W for Hardin:
Screenshot 2024-03-26 225203.png

Even more proof that the venue change is unfair and prejudiced against pro se defendants. Getting that approved is supposed to be a hard process, and this is grounds for appeal!

1711487356408.png

I asked Copilot

Russ is going to lose this case because he's using the wrong AI. This isn't the cyberpunk future we were promised.
 
Even more proof that the venue change is unfair and prejudiced against pro se defendants. Getting that approved is supposed to be a hard process, and this is grounds for appeal!

View attachment 5851690
Hardin should mention that the reason that a venue change is "not an easy process" is that the court will accept basically any objection. If there's no objection then it's easy.
 
"i'm not just arguing the same thing in a different way, and i'm not asking for the same outcome by doing so."
1711487927637.png

this filing:
1711487975120.png

the previous filing:
1711488010719.png
 
I've finished his motion to vacate, and it's really weird. All it is him repeating that Null waived his affirmative defense, just additionally citing to 28 U.S. Code § 1406 (which his own caselaw interprets the same way), but Null's affirmative defenses are not at issue. Null is not seeking dismissal by asserting an affirmative defense of an improper venue, he sought and received, a change of venue under the appropriate federal law. That is quite different, and something both the court and Mr. Hardin understood
 
His stuff reminds me of student papers where they are told cite a ton of articles to prove their point. So they do with no real basis to understanding if the articles have anything to do with the paper. Quantity over quality.
 
Ralph has hated Null before. Eventually he'll kill the braincells that remember why with booze.
There's only one cow with the right mindset, rage, physical prowess and debilitating need for cash to run collections for Null, and that's one Bossman Jack.

I do, however, concede that the collections making it from the collectee to Null might be problematic.
 
Back
Top Bottom