Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

[Betonhaus]

We need to add a captcha that screams at them and calls them niggers if they try to sign up with a supremecourt.gov email address.

Wouldn't it make sense to have anyone who signs up with a .gov email address have a mark like a lit lightbulb or a glowing backdrop to their avatar?

 

[mindlessobserver]

They can tell whatever lies about us they like and ignore cases involving the forum provided they are effective and consistent at achieving legislation and rulings that allow this place to exist by picking and choosing their battles, and I'd still rather support them than burn the money.

Through that lens, do they do more good or harm?

The problem with your logic is that principles are not tested by the people society determines to be morally acceptable. Morally acceptable people don't bring about societal or legal challenges. The EFF seems to want to find cases where people who look good on the cover of the Washington Post are given a sympathetic cause to challenge big tech or the government. The problem is these people don't exist because Big Tech and the Government don't mess with people this sympathetic and let them do whatever they want.

 

[Sexy Senior Citizen]

Wouldn't it make sense to have anyone who signs up with a .gov email address have a mark like a lit lightbulb or a glowing backdrop to their avatar?

Every account connected to a .gov email should have this profile picture and be unable to change it:

 

[Daddy's Little Kitten]

I love that while all of this is going down and keeps missing deadlines, he's trying to get brothels legalized and writing reviews for people staring at his paralysis.

Bless his retarded heart.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

The problem with your logic is that principles are not tested by the people society determines to be morally acceptable. Morally acceptable people don't bring about societal or legal challenges. The EFF seems to want to find cases where people who look good on the cover of the Washington Post are given a sympathetic cause to challenge big tech or the government. The problem is these people don't exist because Big Tech and the Government don't mess with people this sympathetic and let them do whatever they want.

The "at first they came for X" story is a meme, but it has some truth in it. Idiots do NOT realize that if you're trying to change something, you pick the most sympathetic people to support, and the most hated people to target.

 

[Harvey Danger]

For great justice...

 

[Andoxico]

From the dates they reject cases.

Where exactly are you getting this info? Those dates are nowhere to be seen in the case distribution schedule.

 

[mindlessobserver]

View attachment 5785413

Just think about it. There is a timeline out there in the Multiverse where Null got left alone. Got bored, took that cushy programming job, because his reputation was not dragged through the mud and he could be hired at some no name tech start up. Got married, had a family. Left Kiwifarms behind and the website slowly faded into obscurity along with Chris-Chan.

This is not the timeline we live in.

 

[reptile baht spaniard rid]

Where exactly are you getting this info? Those dates are nowhere to be seen in the case distribution schedule.

It's best guesses based on past actions.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

View attachment 5785413

The best leaders tend to be the ones who are a bit apprehensive about it but realize they're the only one who can do it right.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Where exactly are you getting this info? Those dates are nowhere to be seen in the case distribution schedule.

The Supreme Court Calendar.

 

[Andoxico]

The Supreme Court Calendar.

None of the dates you've listed thus far are marked as conference days on the supreme court calendar

 

[Neetorino]

View attachment 5785413

This is not the timeline we live in.

And we're all better for it. Now to save America from copyright faggotry like Greer loves so damn much.

 

[Not Really Here]

None of the dates you've listed thus far are marked as conference days on the supreme court calendar

For writs you need to look at the list of orders.

 

[Google.com]

Anyone who thinks any clerk or Judge in the supreme court gives a shit what a Kiwifarms is is retarded. The judges probably need help logging into their email.

 

[DavidS877]

Anyone who thinks any clerk or Judge in the supreme court gives a shit what a Kiwifarms is is retarded. The judges probably need help logging into their email.

It's very likely they don't need help logging into their email as they've never done it. They have clerks for that. Print the email, hand it to the judge, take dictation for the response, type it up and send it.

 

[Cynically Insane]

No, just that it's officially in their system. Before now, it wasn't.

I learned about this when Melinda Scott filed.

Remember when she thought cert was granted at this stage because it showed up on the Scotus website? And when she wrote the entire petition for cert with a pen because she misunderstood the rules? Good times.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

10th Circuit of Court of Appeals has been informed of the appeal to the Supreme Court by the Clerk of the Supreme Court

None of the dates you've listed thus far are marked as conference days on the supreme court calendar

I literally do not know how to help you bro. I listed the days SCOTUS issues denials of the petitions for writs. I told you that three times already. I legitimately do not understand how are you being confused

 

[Marvin]

I genuinely wonder what Clarence Thomas thinks of Kiwi Farms.

"where da white wimmin at??"

(kidding, Justice Thomas is the man)

Assuming I can either donate a dollar to FIRE, donate it to the EFF, or light it on fire, which should I even do at this point?

I can understand their position logically/philosophically but they're (morally) wrong here. Between this, their tacit acceptance of girltalk tactics, and refusal to help on the Greer appeal to the 10th circuit, I'm frustrated by the EFF. At the same time, they did do the Protect the Stack thing, and as recently as his Heterodorx appearance (IIRC) Null still thought they did net good for the Cause overall.

I understand they're in SF, full of pozzed people, and have to make some compromises, but when they're actively filing pro-censorship amicus briefs, it's hard to stomach.

A quarter to EFF and the rest to FIRE. The EFF is retarded and believes in we're genociding the good people of transylvania, but within the framework of their core values, they still do good work. Still worrying how they've fallen to dumb propaganda. FIRE is solid and I have no complaints.

It's very likely they don't need help logging into their email as they've never done it. They have clerks for that. Print the email, hand it to the judge, take dictation for the response, type it up and send it.

What a comfy life. I'm jealous.

 

[Marvin]

FIRE is of the opinion that if Government forces a private company to censor someone by threats of legislation, criminal prosecution, civil prosecution, fines, and so on, that is perfectly fine, moral and constitutional, despite the fact that there is more than 50 years of solid history of the Supreme Court saying the exact opposite.

That doesn't sound right. Context? I can't square that with their otherwise broadly old school ACLU tier 1st amendment advocacy.