Why Are Women Reading and Listening to Porn in Public? - Checkmate, feminists.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account


Why Are Women Reading and Listening to Porn in Public?

Subtle romance novel covers and erotic audio apps make it easier than ever. Is that a good thing?

By Magdalene Taylor
19 January 2024, 4:34pm


Erotic novels have always been women’s domain. All those old paperbacks featuring a Fabio-esque shirtless man riding a horse in front of a castle you used to see at your grandma’s house — those were all smut. “Romance” novels are often just a nicer term for books about a woman getting dicked down, and the covers betrayed that. But as of late, the genre has taken on a new life. Paired with audiobooks and audio storytelling apps, women’s erotic content is more popular than ever. Not only that, women are conspicuously consuming it in mundane, public situations… and that’s kind of weird?

Several of the most popular, bestselling books of the last two years have been erotic, at least in part. Novels by Colleen Hoover, which are “rich with graphic sex scenes,” have dominated the New York Times bestseller charts with several weeks-long No. 1 spots. That these books are so popular in real life is, unsurprisingly, linked to their popularity online. On Booktok, one of TikTok’s largest communities, videos devoted to highlighting “spicy” content like Hoover’s are among the highest-viewed on the hashtag. Booktok has been critical in the success of romance/erotic books—not only in promoting the specific books themselves but in “normalizing” reading them. When videos of everyday women wearing Skims and slickbacked buns describing their favorite literary sex scenes go viral and the comments sections are filled with women who look the same, the implicit message for the viewer is that it’s all totally ordinary.


Unlike the Fabio days, today’s biggest romance/erotic books have entirely nondescript covers. They’re covers that you wouldn’t think twice about if you saw them prominently displayed at the airport or in the hands of a colleague on their lunch break. Many of the more recent paperbacks appear no different than any other mass-market novel, replete with some floral motifs and large condensed minimalist fonts. Even older erotic novels are having their covers entirely recalibrated, replacing men who had perfectly chiseled abs with illustrations of women in mom jeans and messy buns. While women online seem perfectly happy to admit to routinely listening to or reading narrative sex scenes, their books’ covers suggest that, somewhat fairly, they don’t want the strangers around them to know it as it’s happening.

Meanwhile, apps like Dipsea and Quinn have capitalized on the erotica market through audio. Both feature women-focused explicit stories, ranging from intricate romances to something along the lines of straight-up dirty talk. Some are undoubtedly meant to be used for masturbation, while others may be more of a slow burn. Regardless, these apps and erotic novels can in many ways be interpreted like porn—in fact, articles explaining why women like erotica often explicitly detail why women prefer erotica instead of pornography. And thanks to headphones and subtle covers, they can be consumed anytime, anywhere.

Erotica may have some benefits beyond just being horny and hot. A 2022 study from the Journal of Sex Research found that women who read the genre have 74 percent more sex than those who don’t. Cool! It’s good for people to have sex. And perhaps these women are truly pressed for time, busy with all the other responsibilities of a career or family or relationship, so their morning commute may be the only opportunity they have to indulge!

Still, would we not consider it strange, at minimum, for a man to be doing the same? To be reading or listening to this content in the company of others? I get it, I get it—erotica isn’t quite the same thing as viewing hardcore pornography; women’s sexualities are often deprioritized; men’s sexuality has the possibility of being more threatening; etc. At the end of the day, I want women to enjoy erotica and enjoy their sexuality. Maybe, though, the end of the day is exactly the right time for it, in the privacy of your own home. Get your rocks off, ladies. Just not in public.
 
Reason #26487 not to ride public transit: "Why is there all this clear snot on my seat and why does it smell like the wharf in here?"
 
I don't want to catch a whiff of horny pussy stank while I'm on a fucking airplane or the bus or whatever, she doesn't want to fuck me, I don't want to fuck her, and let's not ignore the obvious double standard; a guy rocking a raging boner in public is the kind of shit that gets people calling the cops.
Being horny in public has never and will never and should never be a crime, and if you're being discreet enough that somebody has to actually check out your tent or lean over and sniff your pussy to even notice it, you're fucking fine and they're the one being weird and disgusting.
 
Being horny in public has never and will never and should never be a crime,

being gross is not the same as being criminal. public decency laws exist to establish a standard of behavior but mainly only punish extreme cases. the rest is just part of the social contract, which I am observing by not rocking a max chub whenever I feel like it. I fail to see how I am being weird and disgusting by expecting the same from others.
 
The article is victim-blaming, there are still far fewer coomer women than men.

Unlike the Fabio days, today’s biggest romance/erotic books have entirely nondescript covers.
That's because everything is coom-saturated. Fucking Oppenheimer is actually porn.

their books’ covers suggest that, somewhat fairly, [women] don’t want the strangers around them to know it as it’s happening.
THANK FUCK THEY DON'T.
I went to war in a commercial telegram chat today, faggots were posting porn searching for partners. I won, the admins went on lockdown, cleaned up the chat, and established rules banning porn.

A 2022 study from the Journal of Sex Research found that women who read the genre have 74 percent more sex than those who don’t. Cool! It’s good for people to have sex.
1. A study from "the journal of sex research" is probably garbage.
2. I bet my rear ovary they had no way to control for coomer #values (women who readily admit to cooming also say they have more sex).
3. How many of the women are in a committed relationship, though? I bet the percentage goes the other way, because if it was favorable to coomers, the coomer j*urno would state it. Fucking random men gets women killed.

Still, would we not consider it strange, at minimum, for a man to be doing the same? To be reading or listening to this content in the company of others?
No we wouldn't. Men watch and read porn in public all the time. They do it during commute, they do it during work meetings, they do it in parliament. They even hack e-billboards to show porn on them.

I don't think there's a degenerate behavior that women do more of. (Men fuck dogs 20 times more often, too.)
 
Ladies you can read all the Chuck Tingle yaoi you want.

Me? Yes this game is about collecting women, and I got the sound muted so its ok.

Just remember that if you blast it loudly I will be chuckling. With you, not at you, I promise. I ain't gay enough to hear the words "Jurassic load" and not chuckle.
 
Screenshot 2024-01-22 at 18.43.28.jpg

What do these people think "POV" means?
 
I find romance boring. I'd rather read sci fi or horror or those weird mindfuck stories where it turns out the whole thing wasn't real because aliens, you are a computer program or you're already dead. Something like that.

View attachment 5656399

What do these people think "POV" means?

Isn't POV first person? As in it's in your point of view? It would be POV if she had camera glasses and was filming herself cook while listening to her audiobook. Lol so meta yu gaiz.
 
that's not porn

edit - well, i guess it could be depending on your definition.
talking is porn for women. that's why a guy could look at that website (or a "romance" novel) and just have his eyes glaze over from the millions of boring words and not understand that he's reading what women get off to. that's why they can get away with it in public
 
talking is porn for women. that's why a guy could look at that website (or a "romance" novel) and just have his eyes glaze over from the millions of boring words and not understand that he's reading what women get off to. that's why they can get away with it in public

Fuck you. You don't have to be a woman to be into this shit, ever heard of letters to Penthouse? There are two times in my life when I found out I had defied social conventions by complete accident as I had an interest in something that was apparently insanely popular with women: true crime podcasts and erotica.
 
Last edited:
If she doesn’t have taste in smut, then she isn’t the one.
 

that's not porn

edit - well, i guess it could be depending on your definition.
Erotica and porn were never the same. I guess the difference between them got absolutely blurred when 50 Shades was published and a lot of women assumed badly written porn was the same as erotica, despite 50 Shades being the most unerotic story ever written.
 
Back
Top Bottom