Liz Fong-Jones / 方禮真 / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey / Honeycomb.io Field CTO - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Wy4M said:
Christine Yen is the other CEO.
She seems to be a little racist.
View attachment 5647071
View attachment 5647073

Her Github profile pic:
View attachment 5647074

More in this post: https://kiwifarms.hk/threads/liz-fong-jones-elliot-william-fong-lizthegrey.128419/post-16346299

Some more info about Charity Majors here: https://kiwifarms.hk/threads/liz-fong-jones-elliot-william-fong-lizthegrey.128419/post-16346116
View attachment 5647078
View attachment 5647080
View attachment 5647083
Click to expand...

So she basically has a stay at home dad to her kids while she's out getting hammered on tequila and lezzing it up while she shit talks him on main? Wow

This bitch needs a strong pimp hand like yesterday
 
Stupid Sexy Flanders said:
How the fuck does that neck support that enormous skull?
Click to expand...
That choker seems to be pretty tight.
...
1705867313013.png
 
Wy4M said:
Elliot has another dog which also has a twitter account TheFlurbs.
A tweet from Nov 2015:
View attachment 5653290

Apparently Elliot once had a girlfriend Erica:
View attachment 5653291

Erica taught Elliot how to spin so Elliot decided to spin dog hair that belonged to his other dog Misty.
View attachment 5653292

Elliot spinning some Misty fur. Dunno for what. A suit?
View attachment 5653295


Screenshots from his husband's tumblr can be found in this post:

It contains this pic which I assume was taken in their bathroom. You can see Elliot's glasses, 2 collars, a toothbrush, a (wedding?) ring and some dog hair.
View attachment 5653304

There are more but here you can see a few:
View attachment 5653311View attachment 5653312View attachment 5653313

That tumblr archive also contains this picture of Elliot wearing a collar. No idea what was going on. I hope no dog was involved.
Edit - spoiler on request
View attachment 5653319
Where there's Elliot, there's dog hair.
Click to expand...
You didn't notice the men's razor on the sink?
1705869074621.png
 
Owlbear said:
I think you may be misinterpreting the series D funding. Down rounds are very rare, and it's very common to go to series E-F before IPO these days. A $50 million series D is surprisingly small, though. However, the whole field of "observability" is very hot these days, and is essentially about making tools to look through your logs and traces to make sure everything at your tech company is running correctly. This is only a hard problem because most companies these days buy thousands of SaaS products which are all fragile in their own ways.
Click to expand...
Observability is a bit more than that, ideally observability also includes instrumenting your applications and collecting data from within the applications. This may include changing the source codes to the applications to inject data collecting points.

Anyway, it is HOT but it is also provided by default in the frameworks you use to build your applications to run in (any) cloud.
All cloud vendors have this built in to their frameworks and all the apis and services that you use in the cloud.

Honeycombs solution is much more primitive since it does not have the same deep integration to collect data as you get out-of-the-box in Google/Azure/AWS/... cloud, though I assume you can? deepen the integration and collect internal data from the apps, IFF you have the capability to modify and recompile the applications (==i.e. you only use open source)


But regardless, the main issue for Honeycomb is the market. Their product might be good (I have no idea if it is) but that is still moot because their product is redundant when it comes to the cloud. The cloud vendors have better and deeper observability for the cloud apis and services than honeycomb could ever provide. And it comes for free and out-of-the-box in the cloud frameworks.
The market for their product is largely someone that wants to run something cloud-like but on their own premises and their own datacentres.
Sure, that market exists but it is shrinking as all these things are migrated off premise and onto cloud.
That market is quickly evaporating to be replaced by the cloud.

To compare it to other older established markets. What honeycomb offers is like a product that solves certain problems for print-newspapers, problems that do not exist for online news-sites.
 
Last edited:
Cuckoman said:
What honeycomb offers is like a product that solves certain problems for print-newspapers, problems that do not exist for online news-sites.
Click to expand...
so basically it IS just an elaborate scam, based on largely obsolete tech.

It sounds like they've managed to obscure the core of what they claim to be doing in their pitch material, to the point where it comes off as cutting-edge to perhaps an older investor who isn't up on the latest tech descriptions.

And because it's outdated they can basically just sit around their offices, thumbs up their asses, giving themselves fat paychecks and occasionally sending Ching Chong to go do "rah-rah" presentations at tech conferences. Scam.
 
Cuckoman said:
The market for their product is largely someone that wants to run something cloud-like but on their own premises and their own datacentres.
Click to expand...
I haven't looked at the Honeycomb product much, but it seems it's a service, not software, so those paranoid companies that don't want their crap in the cloud still wouldn't be the target market.

My paranoid customers, and there are plenty out there still, have strict controls on a fair portion of their stuff and sending any telemetry off-site isn't going to fly.
 
Billy Bob Dick said:
So basically it IS just an elaborate scam, based on largely obsolete tech.
Click to expand...
Theranos proved you can fabricate technology out of thin air and grift hundreds of millions from investors. Its a startup tactic where you obfuscate information under the guise of it being so competitive and worried about proprietary issues that you don't reveal the whole operation. Sometimes it works out and the company's lies can actually propel it to stardom because it gave them more time or money, other times its a complete scam with no intention of delivery.
 
Myrtle the Turtle said:
Theranos proved you can fabricate technology out of thin air and grift hundreds of millions from investors. Its a startup tactic where you obfuscate information under the guise of it being so competitive and worried about proprietary issues that you don't reveal the whole operation. Sometimes it works out and the company's lies can actually propel it to stardom because it gave them more time or money, other times its a complete scam with no intention of delivery.
Click to expand...
I would be hesitant to call Honeycomb a scam, but it is a weaker product in an oversaturated market with an absurd price for what it offers.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom