💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

[Maude Snew]

Well I guess I was completely wrong about beer alcoholism. Thank you Nick for being such a colossal fuckup that people are learning new things.

 

[Pomniman]

True. Especially true if they're openly alcoholic. Bottles of liquor are easier to conceal than several cases of beer.

Fun fact, I have heard first hand of several medical accounts that drinking a six pack of beer can help pass difficult kidney stones. Some medical professionals will actually recommend to do this in private optionally. The idea is that something in it helps to round them out so that they can more easily pass the ureter. Obviously in conjunction with medication. I remember an ER nurse saying they passed a 11mm (absurd) stone using this method. So see, there are benefits! You should keep drinking even if you become destitute, Nick!

Do I think it works? I don't care. Beer is not my thing. I prefer a good whiskey, rum or wine. I don't drink to get drunk or even tipsy. I drink preferably when in good company or during the holidays. Having a good beverage on hand is what's critical.

A cold beer is nice on a hot summer day. Though if you're drinking it by the case you might be a non-practicing plumber with a Polish surname.

 

[Harm]

Before I forget, there's a quick random Nick lie I wanted to point out (might have already been noted, so apologies if I'm late here): In December, he claims the reason he licks the bottles is because he sets them onto the carpet after he finishes pouring a drink. This means he cannot set a coaster or a paper towel or anything under the bottles because they're going onto the carpet instead of a flat, solid surface.

However, in the 2023 Lolcow of the Year recap video, when he's showing off his 30 bottles of booze surrounding himself, you can CLEARLY hear when he sets them down that they're being set onto hard, solid surfaces. Even if we presume he means that the bottle he pours from is on the carpet while others which aren't being drank sit on the solid surfaces, the question becomes why he doesn't move the bottle in-use to the surface while the others are moved to the carpet?

Oh right, it's all lies. None of it matters. Nick doesn't respect his viewers. He only wants stupid viewers he can lie to and get away with it.

 

[Himedall All-seeing Waifu]

Before I forget, there's a quick random Nick lie I wanted to point out (might have already been noted, so apologies if I'm late here): In December, he claims the reason he licks the bottles is because he sets them onto the carpet after he finishes pouring a drink. This means he cannot set a coaster or a paper towel or anything under the bottles because they're going onto the carpet instead of a flat, solid surface.

However, in the 2023 Lolcow of the Year recap video, when he's showing off his 30 bottles of booze surrounding himself, you can CLEARLY hear when he sets them down that they're being set onto hard, solid surfaces. Even if we presume he means that the bottle he pours from is on the carpet while others which aren't being drank sit on the solid surfaces, the question becomes why he doesn't move the bottle in-use to the surface while the others are moved to the carpet?

Oh right, it's all lies. None of it matters. Nick doesn't respect his viewers. He only wants stupid viewers he can lie to and get away with it.

Before that, the lie was that he did not want to waste expensive alcohol.

Some autist here figured out that what would be wasted was less than a dollar for his most expensive selection.

 

[RotPockets]

I have this soviet-era expression by my grandmother etched into my brain "Beer alcoholism is the most dangerous type". Have no fucking idea if that's verifiable or not, but it kept me from having more than a beer a week.

I had a neighbor in my apartment building once that drank a case of Natural Ice every single day. He had a grotesque potbelly and was missing the teeth next to his front teeth. At that time I was 21 and he was 30 but looked 40+. It caused me to avoid beer like the plague. He was such a pathetic douchebag, covered in shitty tattoos like a dollar store Tommy Lee and dreamt of moving to New Jersey because he liked the Sopranos and My Chemical Romance.

 

[Maude Snew]

he claims the reason he licks the bottles is because he sets them onto the carpet after he finishes pouring a drink.

Back in ye olden days Nick would not lick bottles as he had an unused snack tray to put them onto, wouldn't matter if there was spillage, it would wipe off. Eventually that snack tray was needed elsewhere so he had to start licking the bottles as to not drip on the carpet.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

"Beer alcoholism is the most dangerous type"

This concept was new to me but it rings true. There is a perception that nothing too bad can happen from beer, wine, etc. “It’s just beer. Not like it’s moonshine.” There’s a false sense of safety and in many places a strong culture around beer drinking, e.g. pubs in UK, Ireland, Oz; BBQ-loving Antipodeans, tailgating fanatics in the US, and working class hangouts everywhere (bars where factory workers congregate, places like the Polish Men’s Clubs and similar).

You can ruin your relationships and self-worth with anything. Anything external that is an outsized source of comfort or excitement is worth scrutinizing. I’ve even known wealthy women who ruined their lives due to an addiction to shoplifting; they didn’t even need the savings but the thrill helped them cope with feelings and fears they were desperate to escape.

There’s not always an obvious rationale to addictions. People of scant humility like Nick, who overestimate their own intellect and over-value their limited analytical abilities, always think if they can’t figure something out then it can’t be figured out and just doesn’t make sense. That’s fine to assume about certain things, but altogether more risky when assessing potential threats. “What could possibly go wrong with this thing that actually does go wrong for many people?” is best answered hypothetically and not through experience.

 

[MeltyTW]

People of scant humility like Nick, who overestimate their own intellect and over-value their limited analytical abilities, always think if they can’t figure something out then it can’t be figured out and just doesn’t make sense. That’s fine to assume about certain things, but altogether more risky when assessing potential threats. “What could possibly go wrong with this thing that actually does go wrong for many people?” is best answered hypothetically and not through experience.

I hadn't thought of that being a reason before but it makes so much sense for addicts like nick and seems to solve an issue I had trying to understand the deluge of people who suddenly think that way for alot things politically and personally

 

[Captain Manning]

This is really what exposes Nick's retardation.

The company is going to get value for their money equal to or greater than what they are paying you. No matter what, your audience is the product they are purchasing. There's literally no way around that.

He's a narcissistic idiot. The whole "Law Pope" thing is another manifestation of that. Though I think his fellow lawyers (a term I use loosely in his case seeing as many of them actually do practice) are probably getting tired of it. Clearly Sean and Andrew aren't impressed anymore.

Again, Nick attributes his past success entirely to himself, and not the fact he came around at the right time, with subjects people were interested in, and with a (fake) persona people liked. I don't think he fully understands why he succeeded in the past, and really does think all he has to do is turn on the camera. As such, I don't think he has any advice to give Rumble that would benefit them.

As for Rumble, I think the set out with good intentions, but I'm beginning to think they don't really have a workable business strategy.

 

[Maude Snew]

I’ve even known wealthy women who ruined their lives due to an addiction to shoplifting

I don't think we need to be worried about Nick lifting anything ever. We've all seen him shirtless, the very concept is alien to him.

 

[DaleMcGuy]

Please stand for this thread's new anthem. You disloyal, shyster, incel, prudes!

 

[prolapsed_cranium]

I had a neighbor in my apartment building once that drank a case of Natural Ice every single day.

A man of truly refined taste.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Again, Nick attributes his past success to entirely to himself, and not the fact he came around at the right time, with subjects people were interested in, and with a (fake) persona people liked. I don't think he fully understands why he succeeded in the past, and really does think all he has to do is turn on the camera.

Someone shared a hot tub clip the other day that I hadn’t seen before. It’s the one where he claims his show has never had a law theme. He says it has a Nick theme and says the name is because it just so happens that his business is called Rekieta Law.

My jaw dropped. I way underestimated just how delusional Nick is. I don’t know if it’s an alcoholism thing, a low IQ thing, a lack of humility thing or all of the above. But I wouldn’t trust him to manage my spice rack, let alone my legal affairs.

 

[AnOminous]

I don't think we need to be worried about Nick lifting anything ever. We've all seen him shirtless, the very concept is alien to him.

We've seen him lift a bottle to his mouth, and assume that he lifts the snack tray.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

We've seen him lift a bottle to his mouth, and assume that he lifts the snack tray.

I was going to say he also lifts shirts, but then I remembered he’s submissive and it’s his shirts getting lifted.

 

[Pippa's Greasy KB]

This is the type of thing Nick wants Rumble to implement: totally free speech only limited by creator preference filters and individual user filters.

One of the dumbest shit he have thought of. Advertisers want their ads to be served to as much 'halal' content as possible; they do not want their ads served on a stream with someone constantly calling niggers out but they definitely do not want to do the heavy work of curating every single content on the platform so they want the platform to do it and he wants the platform to let go of the controls? Advertisers will flee.

I feel like nick used to say "all publicity is good publicity" isn't exactly true during the vic saga and urged vic to be more vocal about it (and go on his stream) because nick thinks winning in court is secondary to public perception. I think this was also when nick started calling himself a social media expert too.

 

[Captain Manning]

Someone shared a hot tub clip the other day that I hadn’t seen before. It’s the one where he claims his show has never had a law theme. He says it has a Nick theme and says the name is because it just so happens that his business is called Rekieta Law.

The fucking show was called "Lawsplaining the Interwebs."

His very first video on YouTube, uploaded in 2018, was about the Maddox case.

This is all stuff anybody can go check.

And he has the gall to act ignorant as to why KF knows he's a lying liar who lies. A fair number of people here were around in 2018-2019.

If Nick started out as a "Nick show," he would have flown under everybody's radar. Or, if he acted the way he acts now, he would have been designated a cow from the getgo. The legal discussion was the hook.

Either he doesn't understand why he gained popularity, or he knows but is lying because he just doesn't want to do the content that made him popular anymore.

If it's the latter, he should just come out and say that. What he's saying now is dishonest as all hell and contributes to people's sense of disgust.

My jaw dropped. I way underestimated just how delusional Nick is.

What will really blow your mind is when you see people who know better parrot his bullshit. Not that there's many of them left.

I nearly fell out of chair laughing when I saw somebody share that Spectre was unashamedly repeating Nick's cope that Nick doesn't drink that much.

I mean, JFC. Talk about "ignore your lying eyes." North Korean state propagandists would blush over the easily disproven bullshit emanating from Rekieta's circle. Some of it you don't even need to know how Nick used to be.

It's a cult.

EDIT: Typo.

 

[John Andrews Stan]

Either he doesn't understand why he gained popularity, or he knows but is lying because he just doesn't want to do the content that made him popular anymore.

Far be it from anyone to suggest that the superchats Nick got during the Depp and Rittenhouse trials had any relation to legal topics. Au contraire, people were just thrilled that the trials gave the famous comedian Nick Rekieta an excuse to hang out online!

 

[Pomniman]

The fucking show was called "Lawsplaining the Interwebs."

His very first video on YouTube, uploaded in 2018, was about the Maddox case.

This is all stuff anybody can go check.

And he has the gall to act ignorant as to why KF knows he's a lying liar who lies. A fair number of people here were around in 2018-2019.

If Nick started out as a "Nick show," he would have flown under everybody's radar. Or, if he acted the way he acts now, he would have been designated a cow from the getgo. The legal discussion was the hook.

Either he doesn't understand why he gained popularity, or he knows but is lying because he just doesn't want to do the content that made him popular anymore.

If it's the latter, he should just come out and say that. What he's saying now is dishonest as all hell and contributes to people's sense of disgust.

Option C: He's a niggerfaggot.

He always wanted it to primarily be about him and "faked it till he made it" by luring people in with things they would actually find interesting or entertaining. With how much he talks about being a member of Daxipad's facebook group before he started streaming it's quite possible that he always envisioned the show as being a vehicle for his pathetic attempts at comedy so he could be just like his e-daddy, and now he's trying to rewrite the history of what actually made him popular to conform to his delusions.

 

[ThisHill2DieOn]

Someone shared a hot tub clip the other day that I hadn’t seen before. It’s the one where he claims his show has never had a law theme. He says it has a Nick theme and says the name is because it just so happens that his business is called Rekieta Law.

I guess he expects everyone to memory hole the LawTube saga and numerous lawyer panels? If he wants to move on and change his content focus, that's fine, but pretending his channel wasn't primarily focused on legal matters is an outright and easily disproved lie.