Should lolicon / shotacon be considered drawn child pornography?

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Is OP a pedophile?

  • yes

    Votes: 981 74.5%
  • no

    Votes: 211 16.0%
  • it should be regulated, not outright banned

    Votes: 125 9.5%

  • Total voters
    1,317
@Father Fornicatio Ironic that you chose to cite Turkey Tom, when he has made a whole ass video talking about pedophiles in the anime community (which yes, includes Lolicon). Just rewatch his video on Anime Creeps, and you'll see the irony.

It's as the site operator says: If someone says they're attracted to children, real or fictional, believe them.

Plus, you cite the whole “there's worse problems in the worst” is dumb; because you're operating on the assumption that someone can't care about world problem and also be disgusted at pedophiles who get off to fictional depictions of child sex abuse.

Maybe that's a you problem? For someone who wants to minimize its impact by saying “there's more important things in life”, you sure let your fetishes define you to the point of getting defensive when rightfully being called a degenerate.

You can keep gaslighting yourself into believing that you're not a pedophile for jacking off to drawn images of children getting molested, just don't expect normal people to go along with it.

You can keep acting willfully obtuse by trying to separate the terms pedophiles and lolicons, but just know it doesn't work. I have posted examples in this very thread of Lolicons acting like predators in public with zero consequences from people like you, which tells me everything I need to know.
Seems you haven't read my post at all or are willfully ignorant, the second line in my post acknowledged the fact that lolicons are pedophiles. Please read the whole thing again because your accusations are completely baseless, and you sound like someone who chokes on his own saliva.
 
I took it upon myself to translate a Japanese study on Lolicons and their attitudes towards real life sex offenses against children.

First, A link to the Tokyo University study just so you can see for yourself.

Also note the usage of “polite language”, as par for the course when doing literal translations of these papers.

82nd Annual Conference of the Japanese Psychological Association

Session ID: 2PM-049

DOI https://doi.org/10.4992/pacjpa.82.0_2PM-049

Conference information

Sponsored by: Jiro Gyoba, Chairman of the Preparatory Committee for the 82nd Annual Conference of the Japanese Psychological Association (Tohoku University)

Conference name: 82nd Convention of the Japanese Psychological Association

Times: 82

Venue: Sendai International Center

Date: 2018/09/25 - 2018/09/27

In recent years, there has been a growing awareness of the issue of countermeasures against child pornography crimes, and many studies have been conducted. However, almost no empirical research has been conducted on creative works similar to child pornography. In this study, we focused on manga (hereinafter referred to as child pornography comics), which are particularly easy to purchase among creative works, and examined the relationship between the use of child pornography comics and attitudes toward acceptance of sexual acts toward girls. The purpose was to Specifically, we measured acceptance attitudes by presenting participants with four scenarios regarding sexual behavior toward girls and asking them to rate each scenario to what extent they found it acceptable. Consider the relationship with experience.

Participants: 248 university students (86 males, 161 females, 1 unknown, mean age 20.71 years, SD = 1.17) were tested under the event condition group (condition in which the content of the scenario was presented as an event that actually occurred). Manga condition group (conditions in which the content of the scenario is presented as if it were depicted in a manga) and adult video condition group (conditions in which the content of the scenario is presented as if it were depicted in an adult video). Divided into 3 groups. As a result, there were 88 participants in the event condition group, 80 participants in the manga condition group, and 80 participants in the adult video condition group. Scenario As a result of classifying 220 child pornography comics depicting children under the age of 13 using homogeneity analysis and cluster analysis, the results were divided into the ``romantic relationship'' group, ``lolicon'' group, and ``teacher'' group. Four groups were extracted: the ``assault'' group, and the ``assault'' group. Based on the results, she created four scenarios regarding sexual acts with girls. 1. Romantic relationship scenario: A scenario in which a man and a girl are in a romantic relationship and have consensual sex; 2. Lolicon scenario: A man who identifies as a lolicon has sexual intercourse with his younger sister. , 3 Teacher Scenario: A scenario in which a male teacher has sexual intercourse with a female student, and 4 Assault Scenario: A scenario in which a male forcefully engages in sexual intercourse with a female student he does not know. In all of his scenarios, the man was around 25 years old, and he specified that the girl knew she was under 13. Research Procedures This study was conducted with prior approval from the Toyo University Research Ethics Committee. In addition, before the start of the survey, we explained that this research contained sexual content, that cooperation in the survey was voluntary, and that we would protect personal information, and that we conducted the survey only to those who consented. went. Participants were asked to respond to each scenario using a five-point scale ranging from "acceptable" to "unacceptable." He also asked for answers on two counts regarding whether he had ever used child pornography comics depicting children under the age of 13.

Result

The attitude towards acceptance of sexual acts towards girls in each scenario is

As a result of a two-way analysis of variance using the categorical variable, condition group × experience of using child pornography comics as an independent variable, only the main effect of experience of using child pornography comics was significant in the romantic relationship scenario (F (5, 242)=24.99, p< .001, η2= .09). In the lolicon scenario, the experience of using child porn comics (F(5, 242)=26.73, p< .001, η2= .08) and the condition (F(5, 242)=28.30, p< .001, η2= .17 ), the interaction (F(5, 242)=8.91, p< .001, η2=.05) was significant. A simple main effects test revealed that there was a significant difference in the adult video group in terms of whether children's girlfriends had experience using Runo Comics (F(1, 242) = 41.21, p <.001). In the teacher scenario, the experience of using child porn comics (F(5, 242)=54.10, p< .001, η2= .15) and the condition (F(5, 242)=32.18, p< .001, η2= . 18), the interaction (F(5, 242)=9.00, p< .001, η2= .07) was significant. A simple main effect test revealed that the manga group had experience using child pornography comics (F(1, 242) = 7.61, p < .01), and the adult video group had experience using child pornography comics. There was a significant difference (F ( 1 , 242) = 70.38, p < .001). In the assault scenario, the experience of using child pornography comics (F(5, 242)=8.50, p< .01, η2= .03) and the condition (F(5, 242)=13.31, p< .001, η2= .10), and the interaction (F(5, 242)=3.07, p< .05, η2=.02) was significant. A simple main effect test revealed a significant difference between the adult video group and whether or not they had experience using child porn comics (F (1, 242) = 13.45, p < .001).

Consideration

The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between acceptance of sexual acts toward girls and experiences of using child pornography and comics. As a result, she found that there is a relationship between acceptance of sexual acts towards girls and experience of using child pornography comics. Specifically, it was shown that a scenario in which a man and a girl are in a romantic relationship is more likely to be accepted if they have experience using child pornography comics.

In addition, in the scenario where an actor who identifies as a lolicon performs a sexual act on his sister, and where the actor forcibly performs a sexual act on a girl he does not know, the content is from a girlfriend's Dalt video and is considered child pornography. It was shown that those who had experience using comics tended to be more accepting. However, the average value of acceptance attitude is low for the assault scenario Kanojo Rio. Furthermore, in a scenario where a male teacher commits sexual acts against a female student, the content is from a male teacher or an adult video, and those who have experience using child porn comics tend to be more likely to accept it. People use child pornography comics because they have no objection to sexual content or are interested in it, so it is thought that they tend to accept creative works such as manga and adult videos. Also, since adult videos are widely distributed, there is a tendency to accept them in particular.

It literally says that Lolicons consume porn in the genre are pedophiles. Unless you wish to make the argument that chairman Jiro Gyoba is just a pearl clutching American Anti, the study speaks for itself.
 
It literally says that Lolicons consume porn in the genre are pedophiles.
How many times are you going to repeat this when no one is disagreeing with you, retard?
Do you have the lines crossed in your brain between "pedophile" and "child molester"? Because there's kind of a distinction.
 
Back
Top Bottom