💪 Tough Guys Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
AN/ALR56 said:
Saturn never had failures* because it was a overbuilt rocket so that nothing would go wrong and challenge the program, it never had a life outside of Apollo and was quickly scrapped after it.
Click to expand...
Apollo-1 failed during a routine test, killing Grissom, White and Chaffee. Of course the rocket had absolutely nothing to do with that and wasn't even fueled.
 
Plaintiff is fat said:
Rocket Pat STUDIED the costs of spaceship R&D lmao
View attachment 5504011

All that unmatched expertise and still signed a $0 child support agreement.

Reminder Pat was a Musk ballwasher before it became unfashionable among tranny lovers
View attachment 5504014
Click to expand...
Want to remind everyone of the difference between the NASA SLS and the SpaceX Starship. NASA's CANNOT be reused. It's a bit easier to lock down if what you're firing into space only has to come down once. Starship is well... a starship. There is a lot more shit going on than shooting a one time use heavily armored pod into space with that thing.
 
"Avitar" what an absolute fucking idiot.

1700351388719.png
The fact that he claims to have genius-level IQ and believes huge swathes of the population are so stupid as to be deserving of genocide - it's just enraging. He is truly a one-of-a-kind retard.
1700351673093.png
 
WelperHelper99 said:
Want to remind everyone of the difference between the NASA SLS and the SpaceX Starship. NASA's CANNOT be reused. It's a bit easier to lock down if what you're firing into space only has to come down once. Starship is well... a starship. There is a lot more shit going on than shooting a one time use heavily armored pod into space with that thing.
Click to expand...
It also cost over 4 billion dollars to get the first SLS launch off the ground. That's one of the reasons that using a dozen Starship launches to send a crewed Starship to the moon is a feasible alternative. The price tag on SLS + Orion is literally astronomical.
 
Post Reply said:
It also cost over 4 billion dollars to get the first SLS launch off the ground. That's one of the reasons that using a dozen Starship launches to send a crewed Starship to the moon is a feasible alternative. The price tag on SLS + Orion is literally astronomical.
Click to expand...
That's a massive thing. A one time use vehicle is 4 billion dollars. That isn't feasible for long term use. Three and a half of those pays for a brand new Gerald R Ford class supercarrier, which are designed to last 50+years
 
I think you're all being a bit too hard on our boy Pat here, you gotta see it from his perspective. You're all looking at it as the nessecary failures before success that everyone learns from, but Pat doesn't see it that way. Since he never learns from his mistakes, he just thinks mistakes are terminal, and will never improve.
 
Pepperonified said:
The fact that he claims to have genius-level IQ and believes huge swathes of the population are so stupid as to be deserving of genocide - it's just enraging. He is truly a one-of-a-kind retard.
View attachment 5504663
Click to expand...
Im just speculating here, but:

Wanna bet he got that "low 140s" value from one of those old 80's and 90's tests the school psychologists did to enhance the slow students moral? You know, the ones where everyone in class somehow stayed somewhere in the 120-160 range?

Remember those?
3280444-4a67dfd98d8898c2c8d7afc77139df75.jpg
Pepperidge Farm remembers.
 
An automatic clown said:
Rake Steppin Rick back at it
Click to expand...
Pat isn't completely wrong here. He's not a twink. In fact, he's so dissimilar from a twink that he is one of the antonyms of twink. He is a completely obese ball of lard. Along with this, he is stupid, he is egotistical, and he is rather fat too. But never a twink.
 
An automatic clown said:
Pat you are neither 6' nor 225 you fat liar.
Click to expand...
Why do so many men who are 5’7-9” insist that they are 6’?

I know being a midget must be frustrating, but no one is fooled by such claims.

Off topic, but I recall reading in some magazine about a woman who was 5’ 10” but would have dwarves of 5’ 7-9” insist that she must have been 6’ 5” or something ridiculous due to her towering over them.

Creative Username said:
Pat isn't completely wrong here. He's not a twink. In fact, he's so dissimilar from a twink that he is one of the antonyms of twink. He is a completely obese ball of lard. Along with this, he is stupid, he is egotistical, and he is rather fat too. But never a twink.
Click to expand...

Also twinks are usually good looking. Or at least “cute”.

But the most defining characteristic of twinks is that they are 25 at the absolute oldest, 18-22 is the usual range.

Fatrick is too old, fat and ugly to be a twink. He is not even rugged enough to be a bear, not wealthy enough to be a chicken hawk, and not even playful and jolly enough to be a chub.
 
Creative Username said:
Pat isn't completely wrong here. He's not a twink. In fact, he's so dissimilar from a twink that he is one of the antonyms of twink. He is a completely obese ball of lard. Along with this, he is stupid, he is egotistical, and he is rather fat too. But never a twink.
Click to expand...
Maybe a twunt?
 
Screenshot_20231118-193744.png
Is he saying Nazis (National Socialist German Workers' Party) aren't, in fact, Socialist ? And calling them socialist is taking the term Nazi literally ? If they're not literal Nazis why call them that then ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom