💀 Horrorcow Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta / "u/Early-Leopard-8351" - Polysubstance abuser, child doser, dog killer. "Lawtube pope" turned zesty Dabbleverse Redditor streamer. Swinger "whitebread ass nigga" who snuffs animals and visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold. Still not over his ex Aaron. Wife's bod worth $50.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Luna's expiration date is?

  • <1 year

    Votes: 158 22.6%

  • Around 2 years

    Votes: 278 39.8%

  • 3-5 years

    Votes: 94 13.4%

  • As long as a pug lives, Karen farmer.

    Votes: 169 24.2%
  • Total voters
    699
Ah, a Karen Farms joke. Surely that’s never been said about the forum before, by any other seething, impotent drunks. Nah, fam. Pretty sure moralfagging about child grooming is OK, and since they’re MAPs, they belong on the wall… right?

Dude’s defending the very thing that killed his YouTube channel not even a year ago. I have to wonder if some of this is bitterness rising to the surface because Nick stuck his neck out (admirably so, once upon a time) for Null, and the Farms. Back when this thread was a ‘fan’ thread for a lot of us. Nick’s social credit was such that he got his YT channel back within a few days due to the massive support he received. Nick didn’t lose anything, indeed, *gained* a lot of respect for not kowtowing to the tranny brigade even when those people were GENUINELY threatening his livelihood. This was also the same Rekieta that was fuming over Vito being a disingenuous flaggot.

I know, I know, I’m just pissing into the wind.
 
Geared Chris said:
- He claims the current effort in MN to expand the definition of hate crimes [I believe this is the bill] is so overbroad that it would further inhibit Nick, or any lawyer, from expressing even mundane biases about marginalized groups. MN would keep a database of complaints and hire staff to go after those considered dangerous.
Click to expand...
They can't go after you for something that's not a crime, Nick, aren't you (allegedly) a lawyer?
 
BeanRespecter said:
I think nick rekieta is a pedophile. Or at least he wouldn't care if someone was around him abusing children. If he got in with the Epstein crowd he wouldn't care. He simply wouldn't care. Dick Masterson / Vito / Ralph. Pedophiles. Children aren't safe around them.
Click to expand...
you know I dont like those accusations being thrown out because your saying someone would be down to abuse children. I would like to think if you offered nick a child prostitute he would refuse. Also he his ego/pants got big because of women his own age the wine mom patrol getting spicey with him.

He's defending drex because most likely drex has receipts on club hedo and maybe other shit, so he's throwing into this shit.

Or maybe null right and drex is just a decoy ah la dax
 
Anyone caught using shrug emojis unironically should be thrown into the middle of the Pacific:
IMG_3153.jpeg
IMG_3154.jpeg
IMG_3156.jpeg
 
Gorton Colu said:
It is surreal and I still cannot believe that I used to like both Nick and JuJu at one point in time. (Though JuJu started to annoy me a long time ago, I compartmentalized it) Other losers in the sektur never were enjoyable to me like Ethan or Vito.
Click to expand...
It's funny because I did the same with Nick, I knew his constant talking over others in a stream bugged me, but he was funny so I could ignore it. The signs were always there that he really is an egomaniac but easier to overlook.

Hope you have fun on your family Church trip, Nick! Don't waste too much time reading your thread, seetheing, and going on Xitter copefests like you did today! Your kids will resent you for wasting their life events on your phone!
 
Captain Manning said:
No, because that's what Dick wants. All of this has the odor of Dick's manipulation. The sheer amount of bait on display here is ridiculous. He basically wants a showdown like what happened on TDS over Digibro. A showdown that didn't go so well for Dick. He's probably hoping a round 2 would not go so well for Null. Maybe they'd get another shot at the pro-MAP argument too. This time to defend Vito's honor (*gag*).

I think he should throw in the towel with Rekieta, but do it in a low-key fashion. As in, just simply don't go on Nick's show anymore. Don't even bother announcing you won't. Just ghost him.

Just my $0.02.
Click to expand...
IDK. I think the social media push is being coordinated to some extent. But I definitely don't think the goal is to get Null to talk to Nick or Drexel.

Nick has spent all of 2023 trying as hard as he can to avoid talking about the scandals involving either Drexel or himself. I have no idea why that would change now.

Based on Elissa's clip, when Nick was specifically asked about the daughter thing on his Locals stream he totally dodged the issue. He just said that there were wrong assumptions without specifying what those assumptions are or even saying what the situation was for those who didn't know. He clearly understands the entire thing is totally toxic. He doesn't want to get near it.

Geared Chris said:
- At YT 1:19:40 preview: "I will always side with my wife over my children" and "My husband stuff will always take priority"
- Rumble 1:43:40-1:50:50. "That THING [Lady R] is the most perfect thing for me I've seen in my life....Most of the time she is infuriating....I don't understand how she hears things I don't say...The woman puts me in poverty when I shouldn't be...But I like her. And on occasion, she pretends to like me and, like, be my friend.... She keeps me in stress my entire life."
- "We have had VERY SERIOUS disagreements from faith, from family direction, from my antics."
- "If she asked me tomorrow to stop streaming I would.... If she said 'I don't like how you represent us'... well... she HAS said, at times, stuff similar to that....She has said 'I don't like how this moment represents you, me, or us or family or whatever'...All I got [in respose] is a 'sorry, girl' I didn't mean to....I've proposed stopping!... She has never asked me to stop." He then goes on to say that she often asks him to curb his behavior.
Click to expand...
That's interesting. I'll have to go back to watch that.

Seems like a lot of people are hearing things Nick doesn't think he's said though.
 
Spaded Dave said:
You really don't want to start going down the rabbit hole of the "technical" definition of a pedophile and what prepubescent means because I promise you the stench will get on you and start sticking to you if you continue to engage in this kind of rhetoric. Anyone who wants to bang a 13/14 year old is a pedophile and needs to be handled accordingly. Trying to distinguish between MAP and Pedophile, and even to an extent using their softening term of "MAP", is also ill advised. That's just my take though.
Click to expand...
Not just yours. I agree wholeheartedly with this.

Yes, there's technically a difference between pedophila (under 11), hebephilia (11-14), and ephebophilia (15 to adult) according to the medical literature (which is sometimes very dubious, like the DSM V), but nobody on KF gives a shit. And rightfully so. I've seen to be trotted out way too often to try and justify sketch shit. For example, in connection with wanting to lower the AoC.

Example: "Guys, if we lower the AoC to 13, it's technically not in support of pedophila, only hebephilia!"

Just don't.
 
Captain Manning said:
I think it would be funnier if Null went on Eric July's show and they had a nice civil chat. Can you imagine the sheer amount of ass rage from the Dickheads?
Click to expand...
Josh could recite the lore on Dick and Vito while Eric sat there with his jaw on the floor lmao.

I think Vito might burst into tears on stream again if Josh pulled that off. :story:
 
@Null Don't go on his show. He's going to pull a KEELSTREEM and turn your mic all the way to the lowest db setting, mute you, misrepresent all your points, kick you, and then begin disavowing you ad nauseum from now until the end of time.
 
Nick feels like he owes his career to dick, his policy of "ThEY aLwAyS GoOd tO mE" leads to incidents where his morals is thrown to the side for people like dick & ralph but raged against when it was someone from kickvic. You can acknowledge your friends done retarded shit, but it's also gay for spectators to boycott their e-daddy if he doesn't disavow people. Him saying dick & vito aren't pedos is fucking retarded because vito admitted to being one, comedy has some truth to the bit and why would anyone joke about being a pedo or being a "pedophile advocate" which both dick and vito done.

Unpopular opinion but I do understand Nick's frustration with people being jilted because he doesn't disavow the lowcow/badman of the week, because people wanted him to pick a side when null gets in disputes like when Ralph tried to flag nulls merchandise run/channel. It's important to understand that these online personalities are human, shitty sure but there's a extreme pendulum where there's superchatters sharing sad deaths on a 100 dollar superchat or overhyped his legal expertise and there's another extreme who hates him because a lawsuit he hyped up went wrong/didn't disavow X or y.
 


On the topic of pedophilia, I'm only two minutes in and I already have to call something out. I am on my phone so I can't archive.

Nick is retconning Cuties pretty hard here. Granted, I haven't seen the thing so I'm basing my opinion entirely on the marketing. But I think that's fair.

"Cuties is a poor attempt to show child exploitation and the problem with cuties is not the attempt or the intent. The problem with cuties is that they ended up exploiting children in the name of not exploiting children."

No, Nick. This was not some heroic attempt to call out the exploitation of children that resulted in an oopsie. It was utter glorification of the exploitation of children to the point where I, someone who barely reacted to BME Pain Olympics viral video, have to this day never even finished the trailer because it disgusted me so much. The posters promoting the movie had little girls twerking in pop star poses. The fact that Nick is trying to rewrite this to be a failed attempt at heroically calling out child exploitation...I genuinely have no words for it. He is defending cuties as much as someone can without outright defending it and it's baffling even at this point in his downfall.
 
Last edited:
UCT said:
God these faggots are so insufferable, “you just need to smash box”. Null clearly only has a issue with a grooming nigger because Null isn’t smashing enough box. If these people had to get woman on actual merits of who they were as people and not because of grooming, and paying them they would see less pussy then Chris Chan.
Click to expand...
If you groom enough children of the women you know, you'll understand why Drex is completely okay.

Pippa's Greasy KB said:
From the way drexel talked, i get the impression that his mom is exactly like the black women he constantly hates on and his dad is buck broken shell of a man. Wasnt the tourism company that his family had under her name? Kf posted it here.
Click to expand...
What a shocker. A dude with weird sex issues turns out to have mommy issues. Who woulda thunk it?
 
Spaded Dave said:
"Cuties is a poor attempt to show child exploitation and the problem with cuties is not the attempt or the intent. The problem with cuties is that they ended up exploiting children in the name of not exploiting children."
Click to expand...

iirc this was what the defenders of cuties were saying at the time too. Nothing fishy here
 
Null said:
If Drexel wants to talk to me one on one on live I would probably be OK with that but I'm not sure what the point would be.
Click to expand...
The problem is that anything Drexel adds to the narrative will put him at odds with what he said before. I encountered the same thing when making the megapost. Drexel is a liar no matter what, so yeah, what's the point? All we would have is the latest variation on his narrative. Also, Drexel has the following established ways of dealing with critics:

1. He will ask about your browser history, claim you look at porn regardless, which will exonerate him somehow or at least mean you cannot judge his degenerate behavior.

2. He would tell you to show your face, but since you've shown your face, will instead challenge you to say these things to his face (in person), and if you decline he will call you a coward.

3. He will claim you are jealous of him in some capacity (usually a sexual one).

Basically, Drexel will try to shift the focus off of himself and onto you. Unsure if Drexel is capable of understanding (or even accepting) anyone's perspective except his own. He is quite dedicated to his worldview. If any of this doesn't sound like fun to you, don't do it.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom