Liz Fong-Jones / 方禮真 / Elliot William Fong / @lizthegrey / Honeycomb.io Field CTO - 'Consent accident' enjoyer, ex-Google employee, nepotistic sex pest, Robert Z'Dar look-alike who wants authority over the Internet

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Last edited:
Polarity said:
Here's another great example of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maia_arson_crimew

Clearly self-written, questionable if they even have the notability to be on Wikipedia, yet marked as a "good article" and locked.
Click to expand...
Wikipedia is pretty much a joke, troon propaganda garbage, just literally having been born with a dick and cutting it off makes you "notable." What a pathetic disgrace.
 
Honeycomb.io is a false front for a bunch of criminals, using money from venture capitalists for criminal activity and covering up for rapists. Liz Fong-Jones, Honeycomb field CTO, is a self-admitted rapist and uses company funds to purchase illegal services, as admitted by Kat his employee. Honeycomb.io is a criminal endeavor and should be under criminal investigation.
 
AgendaPoster said:
Are the claims from twitter that servers/host is in Australia legitimate (and by extension that under Australian law, shit's illegal).
Click to expand...
No. There are some types of sites which are explicitly illegal here, which basically means they can be taken offline permanently. There are many more which host some content which the e-Safety Commissioner can declare an online crisis event which requires specific content be blocked for a limited period.

KF is not blocked in Australia.
 
The Howlers of Mars said:
It's actually funny, if you look at the page history, it was created by user SquareInARoundHole, who was both CheckUser banned (for those not familiar with MediaWiki terms, this is a sockpuppeting ban) and community banned. It looks like, they submitted Elliot's article to Articles for Creation, and it was declined for not meeting the general notability guidelines (GNG). Despite not meeting the GNG, they simply moved it to mainspace themselves because "I believe it was incorrectly marked NN" and just... no one challenged it.
Click to expand...
Was just looking into this, attached are some relevant images. Is there any decent evidence that SquareInARoundHole is Elliot himself?
A11E4930-8941-4566-8C46-AA4814ECDAD8.jpeg
89557B59-B629-4D59-B607-C0EC32895F84.jpeg
3D1E0766-5BA7-4158-8228-27F80046A132.jpeg
84996608-9BBA-4044-9235-AE2FBC63D561.jpeg

Not sure if these are of any value, but figured it worthwhile to have them here just in case.
 
CooterPunch.exe said:
Is there any decent evidence that SquareInARoundHole is Elliot himself?
Click to expand...
I don't think so, at least at a glance. Elliot is pretty open on their Lizthegrey Wikipedia account and would have certainly gotten CheckUser banned if they were socking like this person. SquareInARoundHole was associated with at least 3 other accounts, one of which is CodeHitchhiker, which leads us to Cher Scarlett (not their real name apparently, but I don't care enough to go find their previous one).
According to the Wikipedia sockpuppet investigation, the SquareInARoundHole account was "Likely" on a technical level (IP / User Agent evidence) to CodeHitchhiker. The SPI request says that they were using the CH account to conflict of interest edit and bypass their sanctions which had already been applied to the SIARH account by that point. They confirmed that CH is Cher because she uploaded a picture of herself to Wikimedia Commons and they were going to delete it for being unauthorized. Cher also openly calls themselves "The Code Hitchhiker" on their Polywork profile (whatever the fuck that site is).

At a glance I didn't see them being openly associated with Elliot, but they are in a similar field and also an activist of sorts. I don't have time to do a deep dive to see if they've associated with Honeycomb or anything like that, it may be entirely possible.
 
Where do I apply to Honeycomb?
I need an adult daycare where I can be a super field CTO who does nothing all day and just calls up women for "girl talk". That's right, pay me motherfucker. I will not fucking work.
 
Kiwi Farms chads winning again thanks to our dear sneeder in chief. Your "consent accident" won't stop following you no matter how much time you waste trying to keep this site down Dong-Gone, get a grip.

:story:
 
Dr. Plussy Pounder said:
DID/MPD (system/multiple personality bullshit) as a high water mark for troonshit?
Click to expand...
The issue we face with using "they" as a gender neutral but non-delusion affirming pronoun is it may accidentally affirm their false claims of multiple personalities.
Illuminati Order Official said:
This is something I would expect from Keffals - a broken addict with severe mental health problems. Eliot is, at least in my opinion, different: purposeful, methodical and absolutely malicious. If he invests his time and resources into something, there must be a purpose for it, otherwise he would just use those resources to indulge his decadent lifestyle
Click to expand...
Keffals has the potential to be a positive influence on the world. Clara could tell his young fans that it's okay to be an effeminate boy or masculine girl, and multilating yourself in the face of societal sexism, will just make your life worse. Though Clara is no longer able to be a father, he could still marry a chaser and raise happy adopted children, Politically speaking, he could spread the word to his socialist audience that the "Transgender" movement has been bankrolled by billionaires to suck the gender-non-conforming out of a lifetime of expensive medical costs.

Elliot on the otherhand is consumed by hate. Any power he has comes from bullying, internet vandalism and intimidating the weak. Even when faced with the shock of losing his sight, he redoubled his hate campaign against our silly little internet gossip forum.
 
I completely forgot vordrak ever existed. Josh mentioned him yesterday and it was like damn, that guy used to be a cause for concern. The fact No Dong locked his Twitter down as he upped his efforts is interesting. I remember when he was listing people to contact and complain to and outlining the ways in which the site is vulnerable to Ddos attacks, more than once he implied involvement in criminal activity. And this criminal activity is connected directly to honeycomb.io.

The cheerleaders, John/Sinseer and that icelandic incel etc will all move onto a new obsession once they stop having success here. I can't see how Liz Fong Jones will carry on from here. It's all or nothing. There's a real possibility he'll cross the line into increasingly illegal activity, the concern is that he enjoys far more institutional backing and protection than vordrak ever did. A trans body of color in tech or whatever the fuck this pervert sells himself as.

Dropkiwifarms is over because it has no marketable faces, journoscum could peddle Keffals as being the uwu vulnerable trans victim. But that doesn't really work with a creepy 50 year old man, an incel and the criminal Liz Fong Jones who doesn't want publicity for obvious reasons. All that remains now is ensuring the people keeping the site online can't be intimidated by these weirdos.

brickjawjones.png

Remember when he was autistically conversing with himself on an open twitter account?
 
Last edited:
Betonhaus said:
Because people are starting to notice that the liberals and their supporters are protecting dangerous and batshit crazy individuals, even when they harm normal people and their children.
Click to expand...
Let me know when they start DOING something, noticing doesn't matter if no Action is taken
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom