📚 Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

  • 🏰 The Fediverse is up. If you know, you know.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
The NYT just indirectly told the trannies to get fucked even more with this perfectly timed op-ed.

1676558969216.png

https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1626208308096024576 (Archive)

Meltdown incoming

Article | Archive
 
Could this be another small sign that the Trans movement is finally starting to reach its high water point and is getting some pushback?
Something like the NYT not immediately bowing to troon whining would have been unthinkable even a year ago, but I'm seeing more and more small signals that they have worn out peoples patience and have reached the limit of what whining and tantrums can achieve.
They are so pushy and demanding, and nothing is ever enough for them, that it was obvious they were building a vast amount of silent resentment and frustration, and inevitably, like a dam breaking, as the cracks start to appear in the facade, as people see others pushing back, they will too.
With all the stories coming out about how damaging and deceitful the Trans movement is, children with obvious extreme mental health issues being fast tracked into mutilation, parents railroaded with threats of their kids inevitable suicide from so called experts, detransitioners coming forward... could we finally be seeing the beginnings of the end for what people are willing to give up to appease the Cult of Slaanesh?
When even the NYT feels emboldened enough to basically tell the ever offended and demanding crybully Troonstapo to get fucked, the signs that the Cult has at last overplayed its hand are becoming more frequent.

It needs to be stated how massive this truly is. Here is an excerpt from the RollingStone about this letter.

IN A LETTER addressed to The New York Times, celebrities and LGBTQ+ organizations are calling for an overhaul in the publication’s approach to covering transgender people, calling their current practices “dangerous.” Gabrielle Union, Judd Apatow, Tommy Dorfman, Jonathan Van Ness, Margaret Cho, Jameela Jamil, Lena Dunham, Joey Soloway, Wilson Cruz, and more are among the signees.

“The Times has repeatedly platformed cisgender (non-transgender) people spreading inaccurate and harmful misinformation about transgender people and issues,” the letter published by GLAAD reads. “This is damaging to the paper’s credibility. And it is damaging to all LGBTQ people, especially our youth, who say debates about trans equality negatively impact their mental health, which is a contributing factor to the high suicide rates for LGBTQ youth.”

The NYT didn’t just refuse to kowtow to some random Twitter troons. This was a letter that was published by GLAAD and signed by some pretty recognizable celebrities. GLAAD is the NAACP/Anti-Defamation League for LGBT people, though they have mostly focused on the T lately. Usually, most people will kowtow to them immediately. So for NYT, a prominent liberal paper that has won over 100 Pulitzer prizes and is the most recognizable papers in America, to not only reject that letter but to publish a pro-Rowling article the next day is truly significant. GLAAD has made public comments against Rowling before.

So, in the past week, Nicola Sturgeon blows up her career due to troons, NYT tells troons to get bent, and gamers who want to play Hogwarts Legacy, an incredibly successful title, tells troons to get fucked. Everyone is reaching peak exhaustion.
 
It needs to be stated how massive this truly is. Here is an excerpt from the RollingStone about this letter.



The NYT didn’t just refuse to kowtow to some random Twitter troons. This was a letter that was published by GLAAD and signed by some pretty recognizable celebrities. GLAAD is the NAACP/Anti-Defamation League for LGBT people, though they have mostly focused on the T lately. Usually, most people will kowtow to them immediately. So for NYT, a prominent liberal paper that has won over 100 Pulitzer prizes and is the most recognizable papers in America, to not only reject that letter but to publish a pro-Rowling article the next day is truly significant. GLAAD has made public comments against Rowling before.

So, in the past week, Nicola Sturgeon blows up her career due to troons, NYT tells troons to get bent, and gamers who want to play Hogwarts Legacy, an incredibly successful title, tells troons to get fucked. Everyone is reaching peak exhaustion.
:story: the fucking Rolling Stone article. I love how quickly the troons jump to "REEEEE! Bow to us or Trannys will commit SEWERSLIDE and it will be BLOOD ON YOUR HANDS REEEE!" Suicide threats are almost a Pavlovian response from them at this point, they have pulled it so often and for so long and gotten away with it.
They try to brandish the mythical 41% as a fucking hammer to coerce behavior, at the same time denying it being a mental illness, and I think people are getting sick of it and noticing the contradictory nature of those positions. If Troons are so easy to provoke into suicide they are obviously mentally ill and should be treated as psychiatric patients and as such unable to consent to body mutilating surgeries. If they are not mentally ill and able to consent, then these suicide threats are just cynical manipulation tactics from a group of spoiled brats that are used to emotional blackmail getting them their way.
I'm fully expecting some kind of pushback from the Troons as they have gotten too used to tantrums getting them their own way, but for NYT to actually double down with a pro-Rowling op-ed immediately after, shows they may be sensing the wind changing and attempting to get ahead of it.
Either way we're seeing more and more signs, from both opinion polls (that would have been flat out ignored or heavily weighted only a year ago) to whistleblowers coming forward about Tavistock in the UK and the underhanded shit happening at St Louis Childrens Hospital, detransitioners like Chloe Cole getting MSM attention, and even pozzed liberal rags like the NYT starting to push back against the madness, that the Cult has finally, hopefully, so weighted the Cultural Pendulum with Tranny Tears that its beginning (slowly, with rusty bearings grating and squealing) starting to reach its apogeee.
 
I hope the tide is actually turning and its not just a case of the temperature rising too quickly and them being scared that the uppity peasants might actually take notice of the insanity.
 
British women are the best, holy shit.

Tiktok (archive)
I don't need to whore myself out on the net to look like a woman
:semperfidelis:

The tranny in question's response?
COPE!


Tiktok (archive)
In the first video, you can see he had an OnlyFans listed in his bio, however the page was taken down and the link isn't in his bio anymore (couldn't archive it fast enough, so here's an archive of the error page).

You can also see that he attempted to make a response, but it was taken down due to a community guidelines violation.
1676561718347.png


Tiktok trannies BTFO!

ETA: another response from Mr Crack Whore. He's going insane.

Tiktok (archive)
Way too long. TL;DW: You guys are bullies!!! She started it!!! I'm super confident but if I wasn't, you'd have a suicide on your hands!!!
Apologies for the video compression, I'm not sure why it's so low quality.
 
Last edited:
I've seen pictures like this making the rounds on Reddit recently:

View attachment 4537818View attachment 4537821
I just wanted to give a quick explanation of why these are weak arguments, and how to respond to them when you see them.

What they're essentially saying here is that because there are genetic disorders, there are birth defects, in which some people do not precisely fall under the biological sex binary that the vast majority of human beings fall under, then that means the whole concept is arbitrary. This is like saying that puberty isn't a natural part of human aging because some people have disorders like Kallmann syndrome where their bodies don't naturally undergo puberty.

And I think it's also worth looking into what some of these exceptions to the biological sex binary they're alluding to actually look like. One of the most common examples is Klinefelter syndrome, in which a person is born with male genitalia but with two X chromosomes. What does this mean? Does this make them androgynous, something that completely defies our society's understanding of gender? Not quite. The only visible symptoms of it are man boobs and an inability to grow facial hair. Also, a smaller-than-average willy. Most people with Klinefelter syndrome don't even know they have it.

That's it. That's the smoking gun they're using to try and deconstruct one of society's oldest and most basic concepts.

I really hate arguments like those in the screencaps I provided because not only are they inane, they're also incredibly dishonest. It's an obfuscation tactic, designed to work on people who don't understand biology (and can therefore immediately call them out on their bullshit) by muddying the waters.

TL;DR: never ask a woman her age, a man his salary, or a trans activist what the word "syndrome" means.
Another way I deal with the Klinefelter and other red herrings is to point out that humans are sometimes born with 6, 7, or more fingers on their hands. But still, humans as a species have 5 fingers per hand. Furthermore, the existence of six-fingered people in no way supports me, a five-fingered person, identifying as a six-fingered person. There's no logical connection between the two whatsoever.
 
The killers are only 15, so their names will be kept anonymous unless tried as adults.

Vigils galore planned for around the UK:

View attachment 4547661
There is also a vigil planned for the large black gap between N.I. and Wales where Dublin, Ireland used to be.
5ad.png
Jeez, those vigils are gonna be ground zero for sexual predators looking to prey on mentally ill kids. (Ie: "Trans kids")
 
Last edited by a moderator:
How the fuck are men being attracted to men "technically straight?" Lmfao :story:
Its still a man attracted to a man, whether its wearing a dress or not, thats in no way a "heterosexual" anything, its Bisexual if anything.
Hetrosexuals, "straight" people are attracted to the opposite sex its got nothing to do with what the person is wearing.
I'd like to read the pozzed fucking study you read that said men being attracted to men were straight and had a "heterosexual paraphilia" lol, was this from the Gender Studies department at UC Berkeley? :story:
TLDR:Bruh

Studies by Blanchard and Bailey that form a core of a lot of discussions in this thread, you ignorant dumbass.
 
Studies by Blanchard and Bailey that form a core of a lot of discussions in this thread, you ignorant dumbass.
Lol ok bro.
At least its not John Money.
If Blanchard said men attracted to effeminate men were (somehow) hetrosexual it must be true, its not like he was ever wrong about anything...
Well if you want to call people attracted to the same sex "straight" because Professor Blanchard said so, knock yourself out.
You wouldn't want to be a dumbass who thinks men who want to fuck trannys are Bisexual, would you?
:story:
 
Last edited:
How the fuck are men being attracted to men "technically straight?" Lmfao :story:
Its still a man attracted to a man, whether its wearing a dress or not, thats in no way a "heterosexual" anything, its Bisexual if anything.
Reminds me of a 4chan post something a wise man once told me: "Girls will be like 'I'm bisexual because I made out with my best friend once after ten margaritas.' Guys will be like 'Yes I sucked a cock once but I'm 100% straight because he was wearing a skirt.'"
 
I also think the vigils will be an incredible source of milk, probably outright violent. The main emotions at this vigil are not going to be grief and mourning, it's going to be anger and hysteria and T-rage. We've already seen them invade government buildings in the US to protest mere laws, what do you think is going to happen when you have numerous troon congregations with the sole purpose of them exacerbating each other's outrage and schizophrenic delusions that everyone is out to murder them? We've all seen them sneeding on Twitter that they need to start fighting back and carrying weapons and killing transphobes, but they know if they do that unprompted they'll be seen for the violent freaks they are, but now they have a martyr to champion and the ends justify the means.

I predict they'll end up destroying property, threatening people, disturbing the peace etc. and it'll prove that they don't give a shit about this dead kid, it's just fuel for their fire. Also, nothing peaks people like seeing tranny derangement first-hand.
 
British women are the best, holy shit.
330465971_9148516611840170_6434537310160797328_n.mp4
Tiktok (archive)

:semperfidelis:

The tranny in question's response?
COPE!
In the first video, you can see he had an OnlyFans listed in his bio, however the page was taken down and the link isn't in his bio anymore (couldn't archive it fast enough, so here's an archive of the error page).

You can also see that he attempted to make a response, but it was taken down due to a community guidelines violation.
View attachment 4549810

Tiktok trannies BTFO!

ETA: another response from Mr Crack Whore. He's going insane.
10000000_23958907737089748_4370869052687477334_n.mp4
Tiktok (archive)
Way too long. TL;DW: You guys are bullies!!! She started it!!! I'm super confident but if I wasn't, you'd have a suicide on your hands!!!
Apologies for the video compression, I'm not sure why it's so low quality.
Ok sure, lady, you're right, but you look like a blow-up doll, so, you know, don't reach too far.
 
Sam Brinton was back in court yesterday. No pics from inside the courtroom, but the reporters were ripping him one as he entered and left.

"Did you steal any luggage today"

"Who are you wearing"

"Did you visit the Larry Craig rest room"

"How many suitcases have you taken"

"Why would you want some lady's dirty clothes"

untitled2.jpg

untitled1.jpg



 
Screenshot_20230216141216~2.png
This guy makes custom Ninja Turtles featuring him and his mutant friends. I guess the nostalgic boys' toys racket isn't going so good because now he's e-begging for a new visage.

Can someone please tell me what is the point of wearing a more convincing disguise if you're just going to wave flags, march in parades, wear lapel pins, and in every other ways tell everyone that it's a disguise?
 
Studies by Blanchard and Bailey that form a core of a lot of discussions in this thread, you ignorant dumbass.
Dude, you fuck a tranny you ain't straight. I don't care if they look feminine you ain't straight. Twinks are feminine you fuck a twink you ain't straight I don't care if the twink is wearing a halter top and pumps you still ain't straight and straight men don't need studies to know that.
 
can you all take a breather? i do believe the sentiment that 'straight guys' who chase troon tail are not all that straight, but I also believe the stronger point being made is that chasers and AGPs are born from the same twisted fetishization of femininity.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom