Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Could this be another small sign that the Trans movement is finally starting to reach its high water point and is getting some pushback?
Something like the NYT not immediately bowing to troon whining would have been unthinkable even a year ago, but I'm seeing more and more small signals that they have worn out peoples patience and have reached the limit of what whining and tantrums can achieve.
They are so pushy and demanding, and nothing is ever enough for them, that it was obvious they were building a vast amount of silent resentment and frustration, and inevitably, like a dam breaking, as the cracks start to appear in the facade, as people see others pushing back, they will too.
With all the stories coming out about how damaging and deceitful the Trans movement is, children with obvious extreme mental health issues being fast tracked into mutilation, parents railroaded with threats of their kids inevitable suicide from so called experts, detransitioners coming forward... could we finally be seeing the beginnings of the end for what people are willing to give up to appease the Cult of Slaanesh?
When even the NYT feels emboldened enough to basically tell the ever offended and demanding crybully Troonstapo to get fucked, the signs that the Cult has at last overplayed its hand are becoming more frequent.
IN A LETTER addressed to The New York Times, celebrities and LGBTQ+ organizations are calling for an overhaul in the publication’s approach to covering transgender people, calling their current practices “dangerous.” Gabrielle Union, Judd Apatow, Tommy Dorfman, Jonathan Van Ness, Margaret Cho, Jameela Jamil, Lena Dunham, Joey Soloway, Wilson Cruz, and more are among the signees.
“The Times has repeatedly platformed cisgender (non-transgender) people spreading inaccurate and harmful misinformation about transgender people and issues,” the letter published by GLAAD reads. “This is damaging to the paper’s credibility. And it is damaging to all LGBTQ people, especially our youth, who say debates about trans equality negatively impact their mental health, which is a contributing factor to the high suicide rates for LGBTQ youth.”
It only took them three years of JK taking abuse and threats, and a myriad scandals about children being irreversely damaged, to do the right thing. The NYT is a rag.The NYT just indirectly told the trannies to get fucked even more with this perfectly timed op-ed.
View attachment 4549577
https://twitter.com/nytopinion/status/1626208308096024576 (Archive)
Meltdown incoming
Article | Archive
It needs to be stated how massive this truly is. Here is an excerpt from the RollingStone about this letter.
The NYT didn’t just refuse to kowtow to some random Twitter troons. This was a letter that was published by GLAAD and signed by some pretty recognizable celebrities. GLAAD is the NAACP/Anti-Defamation League for LGBT people, though they have mostly focused on the T lately. Usually, most people will kowtow to them immediately. So for NYT, a prominent liberal paper that has won over 100 Pulitzer prizes and is the most recognizable papers in America, to not only reject that letter but to publish a pro-Rowling article the next day is truly significant. GLAAD has made public comments against Rowling before.
So, in the past week, Nicola Sturgeon blows up her career due to troons, NYT tells troons to get bent, and gamers who want to play Hogwarts Legacy, an incredibly successful title, tells troons to get fucked. Everyone is reaching peak exhaustion.
I don't need to whore myself out on the net to look like a woman

Even the truest of believers had to realize that "people are who they say they are" and TWAW would collapse when it came to rapists and felons. But it sounds like the California DOC are still doing it.Note the lack of downvotes. The winds are turning my friends.
Another way I deal with the Klinefelter and other red herrings is to point out that humans are sometimes born with 6, 7, or more fingers on their hands. But still, humans as a species have 5 fingers per hand. Furthermore, the existence of six-fingered people in no way supports me, a five-fingered person, identifying as a six-fingered person. There's no logical connection between the two whatsoever.I've seen pictures like this making the rounds on Reddit recently:
View attachment 4537818View attachment 4537821
I just wanted to give a quick explanation of why these are weak arguments, and how to respond to them when you see them.
What they're essentially saying here is that because there are genetic disorders, there are birth defects, in which some people do not precisely fall under the biological sex binary that the vast majority of human beings fall under, then that means the whole concept is arbitrary. This is like saying that puberty isn't a natural part of human aging because some people have disorders like Kallmann syndrome where their bodies don't naturally undergo puberty.
And I think it's also worth looking into what some of these exceptions to the biological sex binary they're alluding to actually look like. One of the most common examples is Klinefelter syndrome, in which a person is born with male genitalia but with two X chromosomes. What does this mean? Does this make them androgynous, something that completely defies our society's understanding of gender? Not quite. The only visible symptoms of it are man boobs and an inability to grow facial hair. Also, a smaller-than-average willy. Most people with Klinefelter syndrome don't even know they have it.
That's it. That's the smoking gun they're using to try and deconstruct one of society's oldest and most basic concepts.
I really hate arguments like those in the screencaps I provided because not only are they inane, they're also incredibly dishonest. It's an obfuscation tactic, designed to work on people who don't understand biology (and can therefore immediately call them out on their bullshit) by muddying the waters.
TL;DR: never ask a woman her age, a man his salary, or a trans activist what the word "syndrome" means.
The killers are only 15, so their names will be kept anonymous unless tried as adults.
Vigils galore planned for around the UK:
View attachment 4547661
There is also a vigil planned for the large black gap between N.I. and Wales where Dublin, Ireland used to be.
How the fuck are men being attracted to men "technically straight?" Lmfao
Its still a man attracted to a man, whether its wearing a dress or not, thats in no way a "heterosexual" anything, its Bisexual if anything.
Hetrosexuals, "straight" people are attracted to the opposite sex its got nothing to do with what the person is wearing.
I'd like to read the pozzed fucking study you read that said men being attracted to men were straight and had a "heterosexual paraphilia" lol, was this from the Gender Studies department at UC Berkeley?
TLDR:Bruh
Lol ok bro.Studies by Blanchard and Bailey that form a core of a lot of discussions in this thread, you ignorant dumbass.
Reminds me ofHow the fuck are men being attracted to men "technically straight?" Lmfao
Its still a man attracted to a man, whether its wearing a dress or not, thats in no way a "heterosexual" anything, its Bisexual if anything.
Ok sure, lady, you're right, but you look like a blow-up doll, so, you know, don't reach too far.British women are the best, holy shit.
330465971_9148516611840170_6434537310160797328_n.mp4
Tiktok (archive)
The tranny in question's response?
COPE!
In the first video, you can see he had an OnlyFans listed in his bio, however the page was taken down and the link isn't in his bio anymore (couldn't archive it fast enough, so here's an archive of the error page).
You can also see that he attempted to make a response, but it was taken down due to a community guidelines violation.
View attachment 4549810
Tiktok trannies BTFO!
ETA: another response from Mr Crack Whore. He's going insane.
10000000_23958907737089748_4370869052687477334_n.mp4
Tiktok (archive)
Way too long. TL;DW: You guys are bullies!!! She started it!!! I'm super confident but if I wasn't, you'd have a suicide on your hands!!!
Apologies for the video compression, I'm not sure why it's so low quality.
Dude, you fuck a tranny you ain't straight. I don't care if they look feminine you ain't straight. Twinks are feminine you fuck a twink you ain't straight I don't care if the twink is wearing a halter top and pumps you still ain't straight and straight men don't need studies to know that.Studies by Blanchard and Bailey that form a core of a lot of discussions in this thread, you ignorant dumbass.
I archived it earlier, but couldn't be bothered to screenshot it properly at the time. I also downloaded all the attachments. I've spoilered them because they're not sorted.I tried to look this up just a few minutes ago and most of thread is unavailable now. You can see post 1 and post 13 everything else is this
View attachment 4544150